In a country where cinemas are normally dominated by wolf warrior blockbusters or nationalist historical epics, the surprise hit of China’s box office this year is a feelgood comedy about a woman who transforms her lackluster life — and herself — through boxing.
Released for the lunar new year holiday in February, Yolo (You Only Live Once) has become the highest grossing film of the year in China, earning more than 3.4 billion yuan (US$470 million) in less than two months, according to the China Movie Information Network. Globally, it is second only to Dune 2.
Critics and cinemagoers are divided about whether the film, a lighthearted comedy which has drawn comparisons with Rocky, is feminist or not. It is directed by and stars Jia Ling (賈玲), a well-known comedian, who reportedly lost 50kg for the role in order to perform the physical as well as mental transformation of the main character, Du Leying, sparking a debate about body image. In February, Jia wrote on Weibo: “It’s not a diet movie, it’s not even about boxing.”
Photo: Reuters
But Jia’s success as a female film-maker is undoubtedly a triumph. Her first film, the 2021 semi-autobiographical comedy Hi, Mom (你好,李煥英) made her the highest-grossing solo female director of all time — until Greta Gerwig took that title last year with Barbie.
Her latest is the only film in the top 10 to be directed by a woman. Films by male directors often “make women seem scared and worried,” said Qiu Yuan, a teacher in Beijing, who saw Yolo three times in the cinema, taking her mother and a female friend along for the second and third viewings. But in Yolo, the main character wants to “become awesome.” Du’s goal “isn’t to lose weight, it’s to exercise and win.”
The film — known in Chinese as Relaguntang (熱辣滾燙, “Hot and spicy”) — follows the life of Du, who starts out as a depressed, overweight, 30-something graduate who has withdrawn from society and lives with her parents. After an argument with her sister forces her to move out from the family home, a chance encounter with a coach at a neighborhood boxing gym sparks a journey of self-transformation.
Photo: Reuters
Whether as an artistic choice or to pass China’s strict censorship regime for film releases, Yolo keeps its focus on Du’s personal life.
“A lot of unpleasant experiences happen to her, but they are all limited to the realm of her friends and family, rather than things happening because of systematic unfairness in society,” said Yu Yaqin, an independent film critic in Beijing.
But in a patriarchal society where women face many barriers in their personal and professional lives, and where overt discussions of feminism are limited, the film has struck a nerve, particularly with female cinemagoers.
Qiu said that women in China lack inspiring figures such as Jia.
“In the west, there are many women who are role models. In my life, my family, my friends, there are no role models or feminists,” she said. Yolo “doesn’t say it’s a feminist film,” in part because it would be difficult for Jia to make such a statement publicly, Qiu said, “but when I take my friends who are not interested in feminism to see this film, they think little by little about how a woman can change her life through working on herself.”
Yu believes that much of the film’s success can be attributed to Jia’s fame and a curiosity among cinemagoers to see her dramatic weight loss. Jia is a familiar face on Chinese television, having risen to fame as a comedy performer in the 2010s.
Yolo “is a really successful film in commercial terms, but it is not an artistic film”, said Yu. “If this film was exactly the same but didn’t have Jia Ling, it wouldn’t be very popular.”
The Lee (李) family migrated to Taiwan in trickles many decades ago. Born in Myanmar, they are ethnically Chinese and their first language is Yunnanese, from China’s Yunnan Province. Today, they run a cozy little restaurant in Taipei’s student stomping ground, near National Taiwan University (NTU), serving up a daily pre-selected menu that pays homage to their blended Yunnan-Burmese heritage, where lemongrass and curry leaves sit beside century egg and pickled woodear mushrooms. Wu Yun (巫雲) is more akin to a family home that has set up tables and chairs and welcomed strangers to cozy up and share a meal
Dec. 8 to Dec. 14 Chang-Lee Te-ho (張李德和) had her father’s words etched into stone as her personal motto: “Even as a woman, you should master at least one art.” She went on to excel in seven — classical poetry, lyrical poetry, calligraphy, painting, music, chess and embroidery — and was also a respected educator, charity organizer and provincial assemblywoman. Among her many monikers was “Poetry Mother” (詩媽). While her father Lee Chao-yuan’s (李昭元) phrasing reflected the social norms of the 1890s, it was relatively progressive for the time. He personally taught Chang-Lee the Chinese classics until she entered public
Last week writer Wei Lingling (魏玲靈) unloaded a remarkably conventional pro-China column in the Wall Street Journal (“From Bush’s Rebuke to Trump’s Whisper: Navigating a Geopolitical Flashpoint,” Dec 2, 2025). Wei alleged that in a phone call, US President Donald Trump advised Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi not to provoke the People’s Republic of China (PRC) over Taiwan. Wei’s claim was categorically denied by Japanese government sources. Trump’s call to Takaichi, Wei said, was just like the moment in 2003 when former US president George Bush stood next to former Chinese premier Wen Jia-bao (溫家寶) and criticized former president Chen
President William Lai (賴清德) has proposed a NT$1.25 trillion (US$40 billion) special eight-year budget that intends to bolster Taiwan’s national defense, with a “T-Dome” plan to create “an unassailable Taiwan, safeguarded by innovation and technology” as its centerpiece. This is an interesting test for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and how they handle it will likely provide some answers as to where the party currently stands. Naturally, the Lai administration and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are for it, as are the Americans. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is not. The interests and agendas of those three are clear, but