In 1519, the German scholar Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa intervened to secure the release of a poor woman accused of witchcraft by a zealous inquisitor, who claimed that such women conceive children by demons.
“Is this how theology is done nowadays, using nonsense of this sort to put innocent little women to the rack?” Agrippa demanded.
The incident is recounted in Magus: The Art of Magic from Faustus to Agrippa, Anthony Grafton’s dense and fascinating study of the evolution of magic through the 15th and 16th centuries, and it illustrates some of the contradictions and divisions that made the understanding and pursuit of hidden knowledge so fraught at the time.
Grafton, a professor of history and the humanities at Princeton University, shows that “magic” was a vast umbrella term encompassing everything from love philtres and homespun remedies involving the bones of toads, to proto-scientific disciplines such as cryptography, optics and engineering. When practiced by women and unlettered people (not to mention those of other faiths), it usually led to accusations of witchcraft, but articulated and published by learned men, it resulted in books that became the international bestsellers of their day.
Not that the learned men wholly escaped censure by the religious and civic authorities for their determination to test the boundaries of human knowledge. Agrippa — whom Grafton calls “the greatest magus of the 16th century” — had to fight to get his magisterial three-volume work On Occult Philosophy past the censors by appealing directly to the bishop of Cologne; although the book immediately went through three printings, it was widely banned and, according to Grafton, effectively ended its author’s writing career.
The Jesuit demonologist Martin Del Rio published a collection of tabloid-style anecdotes accusing Agrippa of practicing diabolic magic: “When he and Faustus travelled together, Del Rio claimed, they paid their bills in inns with coins that seemed genuine but turned into bits of horn after a few days.”
It examines the often uneasy, sometimes beneficial, three-way relationship between religion, magic and science
Faustus is, of course, the most infamous of the colorful characters who populate the pages of Magus — “a perfect star for this period show” — and Grafton attempts to separate the scant historical fact from the tangle of legends that surrounded him even in his lifetime.
Grafton tentatively identifies the original Faustus as Georg of Helmstadt, a schoolteacher dismissed from his post in 1507 on charges of sodomy, who reinvented himself as an itinerant magician and traveled around the Holy Roman empire building a reputation for supernatural powers so formidable that, on being expelled from the city of Ingolstadt, the council made him swear an oath not to take revenge.
But even at the time, opinion on the nature of Faustus’s powers was contentious. Some influential figures, including Martin Luther and his followers, attributed them to a diabolic pact (Luther claimed that Faustus called the devil “his brother-in-law”), while others, notably the Benedictine abbot Johannes Trithemius, who gets his own chapter later in the book, considered him a fraud — “a vagabond, a babbler and a rogue, who deserves to be thrashed.”
Through the principal magi of the high Renaissance, Grafton examines the often uneasy, sometimes beneficial, three-way relationship that existed between religion, magic and science. From outre self-publicists like Faustus to respected scholars such as the Florentine friends Marsilio Ficino and Pico della Mirandola, who attempted to synthesize occult knowledge (including Jewish and Islamic learning) with Christian doctrine, he traces the expression of a desire for a comprehensive understanding of the cosmos and man’s place within it, as well as the drive to control the natural world, that paved the way for the evolution of scientific method.
“The magus,” he writes, “is a less respectable figure than the artist or the scientist… but he belongs in a dark corner of the same rich tapestry.”
Grafton’s inspiration for the book came from the work of the 20th-century scholar Frances Yates, who opened up the field of Renaissance occult philosophy, and while Magus is peppered with entertaining anecdotes, it is nonetheless a scholarly study that will most likely be more accessible to readers who already have some familiarity with the ideas of the period. It also feels as if it ends rather abruptly after the chapter on Agrippa; I would have been interested to read even a brief conclusion outlining the influence of the magus on later figures in the history of science. But these are quibbles; Magus is rich in detail and generously illustrated with examples of diagrams, ciphers and images.
In an age when the pace of new technological developments and our ability to harness forces beyond the human are giving rise to ethical questions and fears about the limits of knowledge, a long view of our relationship with magic could not be more timely. Because the concept of magic, Grafton writes, “played a crucial role in the rise of something larger than magic: a vision of humans as able to act upon and shape the natural world.”
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
You can tell a lot about a generation from the contents of their cool box: nowadays the barbecue ice bucket is likely to be filled with hard seltzers, non-alcoholic beers and fluorescent BuzzBallz — a particular favorite among Gen Z. Two decades ago, it was WKD, Bacardi Breezers and the odd Smirnoff Ice bobbing in a puddle of melted ice. And while nostalgia may have brought back some alcopops, the new wave of ready-to-drink (RTD) options look and taste noticeably different. It is not just the drinks that have changed, but drinking habits too, driven in part by more health-conscious consumers and
RSS