Once again we are being treated to the quadrennial spectacle of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) soul searching after a national election loss. No doubt like all previous such explorations it will find that it has no soul, and continue its zombie shuffle into national irrelevance.
The KMT has confirmed its choice of failed 2020 presidential candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) as legislative speaker. This appears to signal the party’s intention to obstruct the operations of the legislature, except for a few pet projects like absentee voting and nuclear power.
As of this writing, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), which holds 8 seats in the legislature and can swing the balance between the two major parties, has said it will support Han. It seems likely that the legislature will be useless for a year or two, until the TPP’s base starts melting away when they don’t see change and the party’s leadership is forced to distance itself from its suicidal marriage to the KMT. Probably too late.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Before the election I observed that with years of speculation that New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) would be the KMT candidate, still no one in the party pushed interesting or experimental public policies in New Taipei City to showcase Hou’s abilities and inventiveness, and raise his profile. Thankfully the KMT squandered that opportunity.
INNOVATIVE POLICIES NEEDED
That ball is now squarely in the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) court. With the legislature hogtied, the DPP will be tempted to turn to foreign policy, as former DPP president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) did when the KMT held the legislature during his tenure. This will be a necessary but not sufficient move. The DPP needs to make fresh, innovative and publicly visible change at the city level, to take advantage of the opportunities that the three city mayors who ran for president wasted.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
In the US, the 50 states are often treated as laboratories of public policy. In Taiwan, that should be the cities. The DPP should be offering innovative policies to put it ahead of its rivals, starting with walkable cities with car-free zones. Pick a city and get it done.
This needs to be linked with other local changes, like reconfiguring the cities for pedestrians and reducing speed limits. Visible changes in the safety environment will impress voters, especially voters with children. Simply enforcing traffic regulations would help enormously, and generate revenue to boot.
Constructing pedestrian friendly spaces should go hand in hand with expanding green space in cities, especially in older areas. Local governments need to be promoting urban gardening and urban afforestation programs. Such programs would be easy for the elderly who often own houses in older areas to participate in as volunteers and to utilize their own skills and knowledge. Who has not seen the brigades of old ladies in the boroughs of our cities watering their plants by the thousand every morning?
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Though the government, with its developmentalist mentality, tends to expect that innovation is going to involve increases in technology, in fact that is only one facet of innovative public policy. The truly interesting and useful programs address the needs of residents while ameliorating common municipal problems.
For example, in San Francisco the city government started a funding program for local students entering kindergarten that starts with seed money for a monthly payments program with matching funds from community partners that creates savings for college. It is easy to see how this could be useful in Taiwan where the working class is finding it increasingly difficult to pay for their children’s education.
Indeed, as more Taiwanese fall out of the middle class into the working class, programs specific to working class issues are going to become more and more politically effective.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Barcelona, Spain has a program that connects businesses about to close with potential buyers. Such a program could be extremely useful in Taiwan where older business owners are quietly dying off or retiring, while their children have moved on to other jobs. This would help save places that make the unique traditional foods that give cities their flavor.
Gwangju, South Korea has created a carbon banking program aimed at rewarding household emissions reductions. A similar program could be established for the thousands of small factories and warehouses that populate Taiwan’s cities.
Sao Paulo, Brazil offers a program called Certificates for Additional Construction Potential that uses the value added by land development projects to fund infrastructure through investment vehicles that can be publicly traded like bonds.
TAPPING WEALTH
Taiwan’s local governments, many in fiscal need, could use that as a model for programs to target the enormous intergenerational wealth transfer already beginning to take place. The boomer generation is going to die off and leave its wealth, accumulated since the days of the economic miracle, to the next generation. According to government statistics, every year the number of houses registered as inheritances is rising rapidly. There has also been a rise in homes inherited and then sold by Taiwanese living overseas.
This vast pool of wealth needs to be quietly tapped to produce the funds necessary to change Taiwan’s cities.
Chicago established a US$20 million loan fund to support innovations for city services suggested by locals. Any idea is acceptable as long as it can pay for itself, improve services and doesn’t require hiring additional staff.
Taiwanese politicians frequently talk about increasing the birth rate, but policies outside of subsidies for having babies are few and far between. The first city that finds a way to reduce the educational burden on children and focuses on creating child friendly spaces for movement about the city and for play, may well see increases in birth rates. Especially if it can get schools and businesses to reduce hours.
The DPP needs to do this not only because Taiwan needs it, but because the dominance of that party is critical to national security. It is not enough to secure the presidency and control the legislature, though that is critical.
Recall that when the People’s Republic of China (PRC) seeks influence, one common tactic is to build links to regional and local governments in defiance of the central government. Every local government not in DPP hands represents a potential hole in the security of the nation.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS