Hong Kong unionist Joe Wong had applied for permission to hold a Labor Day march, but canceled his request to police in an abrupt U-turn after he briefly went missing.
He cannot reveal what led to the change of heart, a result of a confidentiality clause in a sweeping national security law Beijing imposed on Hong Kong in 2020 to quell dissent. Three years after the law’s enactment, activists say Hong Kong’s police have stepped up surveillance — pre-emptively discouraging rallies before applications are filed, paying home visits in the lead-up to days seen as politically sensitive and summoning organizers for warning chats.
“It’s impossible to organize any large-scale rally and march now,” fellow labor unionist Denny To said. “It’s certainly a process of taming.”
Photo: AFP
The clampdown on perceived dissent in Hong Kong appears to extend well beyond traditional opposition parties like the League of Social Democrats. It has hit groups like a women’s association and even a Cantonese language preservation association whose founder’s home was searched last month, with police demanding the removal of a fictional essay depicting a dystopian future Hong Kong.
“It appears the striking range has expanded,” said Chan Po-ying, leader of the League of Social Democrats.
For some, police visits have become regular occurrences, according to seven activists.
But details of police conversations cannot be shared due to the law’s confidentiality clause.
“The impacts are invisible,” To said.
In response to queries about new tactics deployed by the national security department, Hong Kong police said they “take appropriate actions... according to the laws.”
‘FOR OUR OWN GOOD’
Semi-autonomous Hong Kong — which enjoys greater freedoms compared to mainland China — once had a vibrant civil society.
It bolstered 2019’s massive and at times violent pro-democracy protest movement.
Since Beijing’s crackdown on dissent, which saw thousands arrested, Hong Kong’s streets have been clear of marchers. Even events like International Women’s Day marches have been dropped.
The Hong Kong Women Workers’ Association had planned its first post-pandemic rally for March 8, receiving permission after applying for it. But three days later, they withdrew their application.
The association is not allowed to say what led to the withdrawal due to the national security law’s confidentiality clause.
Police told reporters safety could not be guaranteed at the march after they saw comments online suggesting the event be “hijacked.”
Four members of the League of Social Democrats were warned not to join the march “for our own good,” Chan told a radio program at the time. One activist said police warned him — as well as a dozen of his acquaintances — against participating.
“Some received phone calls, some had their homes visited by officers carrying a search warrant hinting that if they did not cooperate, they would face more forceful actions,” he said.
Hong Kong leader John Lee has said groups with no “capability... should not organize such public events.”
‘HIGH-RISK DAYS’
Activists have also experienced heightened police attention in the lead-up to two key dates in recent years.
One is June 4, the anniversary of the Tiananmen massacre in Beijing.
The other is July 1, the day Britain handed its former colony back to China 26 years ago.
“I asked why they would come to me... and they said those days were ‘high-risk days,’” one activist whose group is now disbanded said on condition of anonymity.
Prior to the crackdown, massive crowds of people from all walks of life would gather on these two dates every year — an indication of the relative freedom the city enjoyed.
But the annual June 4 vigils were forced to stop, while July 1 this year saw no sign of protests.
“They want you to do nothing,” the activist said, referring to the police. Police have also made appointments to “stay in touch,” said two activists, with interactions ranging from a casual greeting to requests for rally plans.
All the activists said they were told to attend their meetings with police alone.
The check-ins have taken a heavy mental toll, they said.
They described a fear of being followed, as well as worries that meeting friends could unintentionally implicate them too. One said he removed his doorbell as the ringing startled him — a holdover from police visits — and he had nightmares after each meeting.
“I can’t live out my complete self,” another activist said.
Despite the stress, holding fast under pressure is crucial, said Chan, adding “you can’t just sit back.”
One activist said she was focusing on “preserving strength for the future.” “I will try my best not to think about whether something is illegal or sensitive,” she said.
“Instead, we should try to argue that this is our right, and it’s lawful — until they tell us it’s not.”
On April 26, The Lancet published a letter from two doctors at Taichung-based China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) warning that “Taiwan’s Health Care System is on the Brink of Collapse.” The authors said that “Years of policy inaction and mismanagement of resources have led to the National Health Insurance system operating under unsustainable conditions.” The pushback was immediate. Errors in the paper were quickly identified and publicized, to discredit the authors (the hospital apologized). CNA reported that CMUH said the letter described Taiwan in 2021 as having 62 nurses per 10,000 people, when the correct number was 78 nurses per 10,000
As we live longer, our risk of cognitive impairment is increasing. How can we delay the onset of symptoms? Do we have to give up every indulgence or can small changes make a difference? We asked neurologists for tips on how to keep our brains healthy for life. TAKE CARE OF YOUR HEALTH “All of the sensible things that apply to bodily health apply to brain health,” says Suzanne O’Sullivan, a consultant in neurology at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in London, and the author of The Age of Diagnosis. “When you’re 20, you can get away with absolute
May 5 to May 11 What started out as friction between Taiwanese students at Taichung First High School and a Japanese head cook escalated dramatically over the first two weeks of May 1927. It began on April 30 when the cook’s wife knew that lotus starch used in that night’s dinner had rat feces in it, but failed to inform staff until the meal was already prepared. The students believed that her silence was intentional, and filed a complaint. The school’s Japanese administrators sided with the cook’s family, dismissing the students as troublemakers and clamping down on their freedoms — with
As Donald Trump’s executive order in March led to the shuttering of Voice of America (VOA) — the global broadcaster whose roots date back to the fight against Nazi propaganda — he quickly attracted support from figures not used to aligning themselves with any US administration. Trump had ordered the US Agency for Global Media, the federal agency that funds VOA and other groups promoting independent journalism overseas, to be “eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law.” The decision suddenly halted programming in 49 languages to more than 425 million people. In Moscow, Margarita Simonyan, the hardline editor-in-chief of the
RSS