In March a code enforcement officer in Reedley, a city in Fresno County, California found a garden hose running through the back wall and other code violations at a local warehouse. Officials eventually uncovered a Chinese-run storage facility containing around 30 freezers and refrigerators, filled with infectious disease agents.
According to local radio station KVPR, officials tried and failed to contact company officials in November last year and began an investigation of the site in December. The city began requesting warrants in March.
US officials quoted in the media said that the place appeared to be an illegal, unlicensed laboratory. The Centers for Disease Control tested the substances found therein, and detected diseases such as malaria, HIV, coronavirus, Hepatitis B and C, E coli, streptococcus pneumonia, chlamydia, dengue, rubella and herpes. Photos showed boxes and other materials piled haphazardly about, and some of the cold storage machinery was not working. Court documents quoted in the media said that the site held “…blood, tissue and other bodily fluid samples and serums; and thousands of vials of unlabeled fluids and suspected biological material.”
Photo: Bloomberg
Officials also found several hundred mice, with over 150 already dead, while nearly 800 were euthanized. A public health official said the mice had been engineered to be susceptible to COVID-19, according to media reports.
It took “76 days and 14 different agencies to inspect and clean up the facility between April to July this year,” KVPR reported.
The items in the warehouse belonged to a defunct company, Universal Meditech Inc (UMI), and had been moved there by a creditor firm identified as its successor firm, Prestige Biotech, after Universal Meditech went belly up. Media reports noted that Prestige Biotech, registered in Nevada, had no license to operate in California, and was not registered as a medical waste generator.
Photo: EPA-EFE
Further, Prestige Biotech has no California address, and addresses for its authorized agents turned out to be empty or in China. According to its Nevada filings, it has a vaccine research center in Osong, South Korea, is listed on the South Korean stock exchange and is headquartered in Singapore.
A UMI official notified county authorities via e-mail that there was another facility in Fresno awaiting licensing, according to KVPR.
Ironically, UMI had received a tax credit from the state of California in 2019. The firm had manufactured pregnancy and COVID-19 test kits. Its COVID-19 test kits were the subjects of a Class 1 recall by the FDA in February as not authorized or approved. Apparently they were still circulating even after the company had become defunct.
Photo: AP
The implications of this illegal Chinese-run laboratory, and the possible presence of others (recall that the bankrupt company was pursuing a license for another facility), are staggering. It is difficult to believe this is the only such facility in the US.
“My concern is to get to the bottom of what happened here,” Speaker of the US House of Representatives Kevin McCarthy said, adding “but also … where’s this happening in other parts of this country?”
And if the US has such gaps, Taiwan, with its heavy penetration by People’s Republic of China (PRC) agents and large numbers of small biomedical and biotech firms, surely plays host to similar firms. In time of war, in an already stressed health system accustomed to tight resource constraints and shortages of key personnel, infectious disease outbreaks could break the health system and terrorize the population.
Though undoubtedly not part of any organized biowarfare program by the PRC, they could easily be repurposed for that in time of war. Imagine if the owner of such a lab, however well-intentioned or ethical, got a call from the Chinese security bureau in his hometown: “your parents are here having tea with us. We know you have a few interesting diseases in storage…”
Doubt that the PRC would sanction wholesale distribution of toxins to Americans? What’s its position on the fentanyl trade, where precursor chemicals come out of PRC-based factories, all of which have Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials in oversight? At present US officials are busy rooting PRC malware out of infrastructure and energy networks.
The Biden Administration has been considering including Chinese biotech firms on its technology blacklists for several years. This is a laudable idea, but technology theft is not the only threat from these firms. The Fresno warehouse debacle shows that the US has significant gaps in its oversight systems that shady firms can easily exploit, and that constitute a serious national security threat.
May 26 to June 1 When the Qing Dynasty first took control over many parts of Taiwan in 1684, it roughly continued the Kingdom of Tungning’s administrative borders (see below), setting up one prefecture and three counties. The actual area of control covered today’s Chiayi, Tainan and Kaohsiung. The administrative center was in Taiwan Prefecture, in today’s Tainan. But as Han settlement expanded and due to rebellions and other international incidents, the administrative units became more complex. By the time Taiwan became a province of the Qing in 1887, there were three prefectures, eleven counties, three subprefectures and one directly-administered prefecture, with
Taiwan Power Co (Taipower, 台電) and the New Taipei City Government in May last year agreed to allow the activation of a spent fuel storage facility for the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in Shihmen District (石門). The deal ended eleven years of legal wrangling. According to the Taipower announcement, the city government engaged in repeated delays, failing to approve water and soil conservation plans. Taipower said at the time that plans for another dry storage facility for the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Wanli District (萬里) remained stuck in legal limbo. Later that year an agreement was reached
What does the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in the Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) era stand for? What sets it apart from their allies, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)? With some shifts in tone and emphasis, the KMT’s stances have not changed significantly since the late 2000s and the era of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) current platform formed in the mid-2010s under the guidance of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and current President William Lai (賴清德) campaigned on continuity. Though their ideological stances may be a bit stale, they have the advantage of being broadly understood by the voters.
In a high-rise office building in Taipei’s government district, the primary agency for maintaining links to Thailand’s 108 Yunnan villages — which are home to a population of around 200,000 descendants of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) armies stranded in Thailand following the Chinese Civil War — is the Overseas Community Affairs Council (OCAC). Established in China in 1926, the OCAC was born of a mandate to support Chinese education, culture and economic development in far flung Chinese diaspora communities, which, especially in southeast Asia, had underwritten the military insurgencies against the Qing Dynasty that led to the founding of
RSS