Taiwan is a world leader when it comes to recycling the electronic devices and household appliances that its citizens throw away each year. Last year, according to the Environmental Protection Administration’s (EPA) Web site, the WEEE (waste electrical and electronic equipment, or e-waste) recycling rate reached a new high of 85.87 percent.
Only a few other countries, mostly in Northern Europe, recycle more than 70 percent of their e-waste. Because such items typically contain minute amounts of various metals, as well as glass and plastics, breaking them down into materials that can be reused is far more complex and expensive than recycling a cardboard box or an aluminum can.
Globally, more than 53 million metric tons of WEEE are generated each year, of which a mere 17 percent is recycled.
Photo: Steven Crook
‘BEST PRACTICES’
Thanks to certification and licensing requirements, informal recycling — in which unwanted toxic elements are often disposed of irresponsibly — is a thing of the past in Taiwan.
“The authorities here have been very smart, not merely learning from the EU, but looking worldwide to find international best practices,” says Armin Ibitz, an associate professor at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages who’s written about e-waste recycling and the circular economy.
Photo: Steven Crook
Ibitz, director of the Wenzao EU Center and chair of the university’s Graduate Institute of European Studies, explains that under Taiwan’s 4-in-1 Recycling Program, manufacturers and importers of six types of electrical and electronic goods are obliged to pay into a recycling fund supervised by the EPA. That money is then distributed to incentivize proper recycling.
The six categories are IT equipment (such as laptops, motherboards, keyboards, monitors, and printers), TVs, refrigerators, washing machines, air-conditioning units and fans. Mobile phones aren’t included.
Taiwan’s impressive recycling rate doesn’t, however, mean that discarded electronics are handled in the best possible way, or even that they’re fully processed here in Taiwan.
Photo: Steven Crook
For years, regulations made it impossible for local innovators like UWin Nanotech Co Ltd to apply their green-chemistry technologies within the country. The New Taipei City-based company, which has invented solutions that strip valuable metals from printed circuit boards (PCBs) and other types of e-waste without producing toxic wastewater, has customers in 30 countries, including China and the US.
In 2019, when UWin established an e-waste recycling plant in Japan’s Chiba Prefecture, UWin President Kenny Hsu (許景翔) told the media that, compared to traditional recycling methods, his company’s processes are cheaper and yield metals with higher purity levels.
As UWin Vice President Leo Chang (張永撙) explains, until recently PCBs had to be shredded in order to qualify for recycling subsidies. This requirement was put in place to prevent double dipping. If a piece of e-waste is left intact, an unscrupulous businessperson could report it as “recycled,” but later pretend it had just been collected, and claim a second subsidy.
Photo courtesy UWin Nanotech
In Chang’s opinion, without a subsidy system, “the situation here would be like that in Malaysia, where recyclers depend on market demand for precious metals,” and where less valuable materials are often landfilled or incinerated with ordinary waste.
According to earth.org, if e-waste ends up in a landfill, “the surrounding soil can become contaminated with toxic substances such as mercury, cadmium, beryllium and lead. These chemicals enter the soil, waterways and air, leading to polluted environments and negatively impacting human and marine life.”
Chang describes the EPA’s revision of the rules, so that non-shredded e-waste is eligible for recycling subsidies, as “a big breakthrough.” UWin is putting the finishing touches to a brand-new facility in Taoyuan at which it’ll recycle lithium-cadmium batteries using methods refined and patented by Hsu, the company’s founder. (A future article will cover battery recycling in depth.)
Standard e-waste recycling involves dismantling by hand or robot, crushing, and then extracting metals through hydrometallurgy or pyrometallurgy or both.
Only a handful of smelters around the world, and none in Taiwan, are ideal for processing WEEE. In addition to requiring a great deal of energy, pyrometallurgical treatment has to be followed by hydrometallurgical processes to separate the various metals.
There’s another problem with shredding: PCB waste isn’t always properly disposed of. Between 2016 and 2019, 2,286 metric tons of fiberglass powder from ground-up boards was dumped in a rural part of Pingtung County. Samples from the site revealed dangerously high levels of copper.
UWin’s low-carbon hydrometallurgy technologies not only make it possible to completely recycle e-waste within Taiwan, rather than sending shredded PCBs and crushed batteries abroad, but are also so safe there’s no need to wear gloves. While showing how the UW-700 solution can be used to remove gold from components, Chang demonstrates this by dipping his hand in the yellowish liquid.
“We can handle 37 metals on the periodic table,” Chang says. He expresses confidence that rhodium — a metal far more expensive than gold — will be added to that list in the near future.
According to UWin’s Web site, one metric ton of waste PCBs can yield metals worth approximately NT$84,000. For a metric ton of recycled iPhone 10 handsets, the yield might exceed NT$1.18 million.
INTERNATIONAL PRESSURE
Wenzao University’s Ibitz says that Taiwan could do a lot more to reduce the volume of e-waste.
He supports EU measures which aim to ensure that more products are repaired rather than replaced within their guarantee period, and that consumers have easier and cheaper options to fix products that are technically repairable once the guarantee has expired (“the right to repair”).
“Taiwan has a key role in designing and manufacturing many of these products. But instead of using their influence to change things for the better, companies here only respond to outside pressure when they don’t have a choice,” he says.
If Taiwanese manufacturers want to sell IT products and components in Europe, for instance, they have to adhere to EU rules such as the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive, which limits the use of certain materials in electrical and electronic equipment. Cadmium, lead and mercury are among the 10 controlled substances.
“Local second-hand markets are weak. It seems Southeast Asian workers are the only people who buy second-hand smartphones in Taiwan,” says Ibitz, who says that every cellphone he’s ever owned was a hand-me-down.
Ibitz says that in his native Austria, for some items citizens have to pay a small fee if they bring more than a certain weight of recyclables to a municipal disposal facility. In Taiwan, by contrast, it’s often possible to sell larger devices and appliances to private recycling businesses. The latter is an incentive to recycle, he says, whereas the former encourages people to keep broken-down items at home — or worse, dump them in the countryside.
When he was a child, it wasn’t unusual for Austrians to discard dead appliances in landfills or even woodlands, Ibitz recalls. It’s far less common nowadays, in part because people know better.
Stressing the importance of education, he says that “Taiwanese are open to change and they’re willing to change.” Compared to several years ago, far more students now want to take his environment and sustainability courses. People are increasingly familiar with the concepts of ESG (environmental, social, and governance criteria for companies) and SDGs (the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals), he adds.
Yet, he laments, “environmental knowledge is quite high, but environmental behavior lags some way behind. So many of my students come to class with a drink in a single-use plastic bottle.”
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
Last week the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) announced that the legislature would again amend the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) to separate fiscal allocations for the three outlying counties of Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu from the 19 municipalities on Taiwan proper. The revisions to the act to redistribute the national tax revenues were passed in December last year. Prior to the new law, the central government received 75 percent of tax revenues, while the local governments took 25 percent. The revisions gave the central government 60 percent, and boosted the local government share to 40 percent,
Many will be surprised to discover that the electoral voting numbers in recent elections do not entirely line up with what the actual voting results show. Swing voters decide elections, but in recent elections, the results offer a different and surprisingly consistent message. And there is one overarching theme: a very democratic preference for balance. SOME CAVEATS Putting a number on the number of swing voters is surprisingly slippery. Because swing voters favor different parties depending on the type of election, it is hard to separate die-hard voters leaning towards one party or the other. Complicating matters is that some voters are
Sept 22 to Sept 28 Hsu Hsih (許石) never forgot the international student gathering he attended in Japan, where participants were asked to sing a folk song from their homeland. When it came to the Taiwanese students, they looked at each other, unable to recall a single tune. Taiwan doesn’t have folk songs, they said. Their classmates were incredulous: “How can that be? How can a place have no folk songs?” The experience deeply embarrassed Hsu, who was studying music. After returning to Taiwan in 1946, he set out to collect the island’s forgotten tunes, from Hoklo (Taiwanese) epics to operatic
Five years ago, on the verge of the first COVID lockdown, I wrote an article asking what seemed to be an extremely niche question: why do some people invert their controls when playing 3D games? A majority of players push down on the controller to make their onscreen character look down, and up to make them look up. But there is a sizable minority who do the opposite, controlling their avatars like a pilot controls a plane, pulling back to go up. For most modern games, this requires going into the settings and reconfiguring the default controls. Why do they
RSS