The mental health impact of the pandemic was so severe that it prompted a “second midlife crisis” for the over-50s, with women worst affected.
A study has found that just before the second national lockdown began, those born in Britain in 1958 and 1970 were experiencing higher levels of psychological distress, on average, than they had ever experienced in adulthood before, surpassing previous peaks in their early 40s.
Data collected over four decades from more than 16,000 British-born adults, which was analyzed by academics from University College London and King’s College London, also found that those born in 1946 had similar levels of psychological distress to their previous midlife peak in their early 50s.
Graphic: TT
This peak of anxiety during the first year of the pandemic was higher for women than men across all age groups, widening the already substantial gender inequalities in mental health that existed before the pandemic.
“Most of the studies we analyzed propose that this is due to a totally different share of the domestic and caring responsibilities during lockdown,” said Dr Dario Moreno-Agostino, lead author of the report.
“An increase in gender-based violence and abuse, as well as additional financial constraints, are also suggested because there’s evidence showing that women were in more precarious situations than men: for instance, from the work point of view, more care workers — typically women — were exposed to more difficulties than other professions,” he added.
Photo: EPA-EFE
This unforeseen second midlife mental health crisis may accelerate and exacerbate the onset and occurrence of chronic mental health and health difficulties, increasing pressures on the NHS, the study suggests.
“There is the question of resilience, but we know that anxiety and depression are the top leading causes of disease worldwide,” said Moreno-Agostino. “Those mental health problems are closely linked to numerous physical health problems — right up to and including increased morbidity.”
He added: “The fact that we are observing an unexpected new peak of the very mental health problems that can lead to these long-term trajectories is deeply concerning.”
The study contradicts a recent study by McGill University researchers in Canada, which found COVID-19 may not have taken as great a toll on the mental health of most people as earlier research indicated.
That research, based on a review of 137 studies from around the world, said some of the public narrative around the mental health impacts of COVID-19 were based on “poor-quality studies and anecdotes,” which became “self-fulfilling prophecies,” adding that there was a need for more “rigorous science.”
Along with other experts, Moreno-Agostino disputed these findings. He warned that McGill’s “worldwide” approach could not accurately assess the impact of the pandemic on individual groups such as children, women and people with low incomes or pre-existing mental health problems in specific countries.
Even the McGill research, however, acknowledged that women had experienced worsening anxiety, depression or general mental health symptoms during the pandemic. That study also pointed to causes including juggling more family responsibilities, careers in health or social care, and domestic abuse.
Other robust studies have reached different conclusions to the McGill paper, suggesting that the mental health impact of the pandemic has been severe.
In 2021, researchers at the University of Queensland found that anxiety and depression around the world had increased dramatically in 2020. In April 2021, the Royal College of Psychiatrists observed a sharp rise in mental ill health. In February last year, NHS leaders warned of a “second pandemic” of depression, anxiety, psychosis and eating disorders.
But Prof Peter Tyrer, emeritus professor in community psychiatry at Imperial College London, stressed that the McGill work was “of good quality and reflects much of what we now know.”
He agreed with the researchers’ conclusion that the pandemic had a similar positive effect on resilience to wars because “social cohesion, despite the handicaps of lockdown and social distancing, improves when there is a common enemy.”
Many people noticed the flood of pro-China propaganda across a number of venues in recent weeks that looks like a coordinated assault on US Taiwan policy. It does look like an effort intended to influence the US before the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) over the weekend. Jennifer Kavanagh’s piece in the New York Times in September appears to be the opening strike of the current campaign. She followed up last week in the Lowy Interpreter, blaming the US for causing the PRC to escalate in the Philippines and Taiwan, saying that as
Taiwan can often feel woefully behind on global trends, from fashion to food, and influences can sometimes feel like the last on the metaphorical bandwagon. In the West, suddenly every burger is being smashed and honey has become “hot” and we’re all drinking orange wine. But it took a good while for a smash burger in Taipei to come across my radar. For the uninitiated, a smash burger is, well, a normal burger patty but smashed flat. Originally, I didn’t understand. Surely the best part of a burger is the thick patty with all the juiciness of the beef, the
This year’s Miss Universe in Thailand has been marred by ugly drama, with allegations of an insult to a beauty queen’s intellect, a walkout by pageant contestants and a tearful tantrum by the host. More than 120 women from across the world have gathered in Thailand, vying to be crowned Miss Universe in a contest considered one of the “big four” of global beauty pageants. But the runup has been dominated by the off-stage antics of the coiffed contestants and their Thai hosts, escalating into a feminist firestorm drawing the attention of Mexico’s president. On Tuesday, Mexican delegate Fatima Bosch staged a
The ultimate goal of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the total and overwhelming domination of everything within the sphere of what it considers China and deems as theirs. All decision-making by the CCP must be understood through that lens. Any decision made is to entrench — or ideally expand that power. They are fiercely hostile to anything that weakens or compromises their control of “China.” By design, they will stop at nothing to ensure that there is no distinction between the CCP and the Chinese nation, people, culture, civilization, religion, economy, property, military or government — they are all subsidiary