Taiwan Plus, the wide-ranging and useful government news site, had a short feature last week on the government’s plan to attract 400,000 foreign workers over the next decade. The feature reported on the experiences of foreigners here and the challenges they face in Taiwan.
That same week, the government announced another batch of special foreigners who received citizenship without having to give up their previous citizenship, another slap in the face to all the ordinary foreigners from elsewhere who have run businesses or taught or raised families here for many years, but cannot access this program. Repeated public trumpeting that there exists a special, higher class of foreigners simply rubs salt in the wound for us low-caste foreigners.
The juxtaposition of these two stories brought into sharp focus the government’s announcement of yet another high-sounding vaporware policy goal and the reality of Taiwan’s stagnant, boss-favoring economy, its inward-looking business institutions, and its outdated, onerous visa caste system.
None of that is very interesting, and in fact, it is not difficult to find countries that are as bad or worse. But Taiwan bills itself as foreigner-friendly and says it is actively seeking foreigners. The hypocrisy thus ranges from annoying to infuriating.
Consider, as journalist Hilton Yip observed on Twitter, that Taiwan is one of the few nations that bans dual citizenship for foreigners but not for its own nationals.
Commentator Roy Ngerng (鄞義林), always perceptive, observed that the government’s grandiose goals conflict with the reality of its economy. When the system does not transform itself, he said, foreign talent attracted to Taiwan cannot find a place. Taiwan “wants to remain a low-cost manufacturing center” in which labor is controlled from the top down. “But if Taiwan wants to become higher-value, it needs to become higher paid … to treat workers as thinkers who help create solutions, not labor who are forced to comply,” he posted on Twitter.
Chason Daily, another Taipei-based political commentator, echoed this in the Taiwan Plus report, describing the Gold Card system: “it’s definitely much easier from the government perspective to create something like the Gold Card than it is to institute very deep system changes.”
This story reminds us, once again, that in Taiwan foreigners basically have two roles: conferring status, and validating. If they step outside those roles to become full and complicated human beings, they become annoyances, even threats.
Taiwan’s economy is a bedrock issue. Its low salaries and long work hours are not only unattractive to skilled foreigners but are in fact driving Taiwanese themselves to migrate in search of work.
University pay is a fraction of what a skilled researcher could make in a developed country, and there they could have meaningful input into the running of the department. Universities here often refuse to hire foreigners, because their administrative workloads are so great that each foreign hire simply means more work for the local profs, because few foreigners can fill out forms in Chinese. Such hidden barriers must be removed, but the impetus for systemic change is non-existent.
Other issues abound. For example, it is emblematic of Taiwan’s obsession with foreigners as status-conferrers that the nation has no digital nomad visa, a reflection of the general government contempt for adventure travelers and backpackers, and its preference for well-heeled tourists who can be schlepped around in herds to spend money shopping in cities.
If a local foreigner wants to change their visa, in many cases they must leave the country and then return, an expensive, time-consuming annoyance that threatens life and health in the COVID-19 era. It also increases workloads at customs and Taiwan consulates abroad, when visas could be quickly switched at the local Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) office.
When 400,000 foreigners are in Taiwan, hundreds will want to marry each other. They will then find that MOFA effectively does not recognize marriages contracted in Taiwan between two foreigners. In that case, the marriage must be recognized by the respective home countries before MOFA will permit visas to be changed, which of course must be done outside Taiwan.
Our school just lost a very fine math teacher who moved to his wife’s home country in part because of this needless visa complication. Their children will have another nationality, instead of being Taiwanese. Do we not need children here?
The visa issue acquires real urgency in Taiwan’s rejection of refugees and family migration, as a longtime journalist here pointed out on Twitter. Refugees represent a vast pool of young people willing to work, often with young children who could acculturate here. But Taiwan will have none of them.
The government’s refusal to accept a few thousand Hong Kong refugees on “security” grounds was rendered particularly obnoxious and absurd, because Taiwan already has hundreds of thousands of spouses from China, who predictably started a pro-China political party.
MAJOR CHANGES NEEDED
Resident foreigners also run into many social issues. Foreigners are sometimes refused rentals because they are foreign, a problem that is worse for females, in my observation. I know several bitter small businesses owners who report much greater harassment from the local authorities.
Tried banking? Better make a will: just depositing a simple check can take a geological era. Banking horror stories are a staple of foreigner humor in Taiwan. There are also several subsidy programs that foreigners cannot take advantage of. Got money and skills? Thailand offers a ten-year visa for skilled or moneyed farangs and wants a million foreigners to take advantage of it. Singapore, UAE, and other nations have similar offerings. Why would a foreigner with skills or cash want to live in Taiwan when they can loll on a beach in Thailand?
If Taiwan really wants to be foreigner friendly, it needs to make major changes. It needs to pay its own people more and reduce their working hours. It needs to ensure that all types of visas can be conveniently changed at MOFA or immigration offices in Taiwan. It needs a digital nomad visa, pronto. It needs to reform its banking system, its immigration policies and its refugee policies. It needs to directly address the largely latent but deep-rooted xenophobia so many of us encounter here.
The outward friendliness of the locals should not be confused with the friendliness of government policy. At present the 400K foreigner policy looks like another Asia-Pacific Regional Operations Center-style vaporware scheme that will not implemented because Taiwan won’t make the changes it desperately needs to make.
Changes it should be making even without all the noise about increasing the number of foreigners.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Last week saw a momentary spark in the election season, when Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) attempted to form a joint ticket, ostensibly to defeat the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and its candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德). This mating of massive egos was arranged by longtime KMT stalwart and former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). The deal predictably fell apart, though as of this writing — Thursday — there was still a chance for an 11th hour recovery. (Editor’s note: it didn’t happen.) Many people
On a dark November afternoon at Southampton’s City Farm, the animals are going about their business. They are all rescues. Penny the pig, a clutch of former battery farm chickens, three pygmy goats and Salvatore the cane snake, so orange and shiny he looks as though he is glowing from within as he twines around my arm in loving, even sensual embrace. All little miracles in their own right. But none so strange as the dull-looking brown shells in the glass tank in the corner. “Who’s that in there?” I ask Hannah, in whose charge they lie. “They’re African land snails”,
In the heart of Taipei at Legacy — a venue renowned for hosting diverse musical acts — Alvvays, a Grammy-nominated ensemble from Canada, delivered a compelling performance last week. With a fusion of indie-dream pop and shoegaze influences, Alvvays enthralled the audience with their catchy, introspective melodies and refined stage presence. Legacy, brimming with subdued anticipation, served as the ideal setting for Alvvays’ show. Almost reaching its full capacity, the venue buzzed with excitement as the band took the stage. Off Time Production, the local organizers, infused a unique touch by having a hipster pizzeria, Under The Bridge, cater the event.
Leading British universities have been influenced by Chinese agents, with diplomatic and unofficial pressure resulting in censorship on campus, according to a Channel 4 documentary. The Dispatches documentary, Secrets and Power: China in the UK, alleges that the University of Nottingham closed its School of Contemporary Chinese Studies in 2016 in response to pressure from Beijing. The former head of the institute, Steve Tsang, has openly criticized the Chinese Communist party (CCP) on several occasions, but said that university management asked him not to speak to the media during Xi Jinping’s (習近平) visit to the UK in 2015. The saga at the