Sept. 5 to Sept. 11
Liu Hsi-yang (劉喜陽) was fired from his job at Niitaka Bank for starring in the first feature film set in Taiwan, Eye of the Buddha. It was considered inappropriate back then for him to moonlight as an entertainer, which was considered a lower class profession.
However, Liu caught the movie bug. A year after the film premiered in April 1924, he co-formed the Taiwan Film Research Association (臺灣映畫研究會) to further his interests and actualize his script titled Whose Fault Is It? (誰之過).
Photo courtesy of Lafayette Digital Repository
Liu’s dream came true on Sept. 11, 1925, when the association ran a tiny ad in the Taiwan Daily News (台灣日日新報) announcing, “The first purely Taiwanese-produced movie has been born!!”
Whose Fault Is It? ran for three days at the spacious Eirakuza (永樂座) theater in Taipei’s Dadaocheng area.
Shot in Beitou, Yuanshan and the New Park (today’s 228 Memorial Park), it told the story of spoiled, good-for-nothing playboy Lee Shih-chih (李勢至), who tries all sorts of underhanded tactics to marry Lin Pei-lan (林珮蘭), a modern lady who champions women’s issues. But Pei-lan is in love with coal mining technician Liu Ke-shan (劉克善), who later saves the day when Lee’s schemes go awry.
Photo courtesy of Lafayette Digital Repository
It was a box office flop, and the association disbanded shortly afterward. The only trace of the movie’s existence is the ad and a short article introducing the film. Fortunately for historians, the article provides a complete synopsis of the plot that contains major spoilers, including the ending.
Local enthusiasts continued to try their hand at filmmaking over the years, but according to late historian Chuang Yung-ming (莊永明), the first commercially succesful venture wouldn’t come until 1938 with Longing for the Spring Breeze (望春風), which also premiered at Eirakuza.
FIRST FEATURES
Photo courtesy of Taiwan Film Institute
Chuang writes that the colonial government began developing a local film industry around 1921 to promote Japanese values and culture.
Prior to this, the Japanese had produced several documentaries on Taiwan to showcase the colony to the motherland and foreigners, most notably a 1907 series that covered the entire island.
Eye of the Buddha was the first attempt at a feature film, which commenced shooting in 1922. Directed by Kaneyuki Tanaka, the story was set in Dadaocheng, and although the main actors were Japanese, it featured a significant Taiwanese supporting cast.
Again, the movie synopsis in the local paper revealed the entire plot, which would be a huge no-no nowadays. The article on Eye of the Buddha was so detailed that it was split into two parts and run on consecutive days. In short, rich and powerful official tries to force a beautiful young woman into marriage, genius sculptor comes to her rescue and the official eventually repents in front of a huge Buddha statue and commits suicide. It’s not hard to see where Liu drew his inspiration for Whose Fault Is It?
The next Taiwan-set film, The Heavens are Cruel (老天無情), premiered in the four-story, 1500-seat Eirakuza theater, which opened its doors in February 1924 on today’s Dihua Street to great fanfare. The best-known of its co-owners was the tea tycoon Chen Tian-lai (陳天來).
Taiwanese intellectuals living under Japanese rule often looked towards China as the motherland, and the theater invited a Peking Opera troupe from Shanghai to perform on its opening day.
The space mostly showcased traditional Taiwanese and Chinese performances and plays, only screening the occasional movie. It also had a Western-style house band.
Eirakuza was also a popular spot for Taiwanese political activists to make speeches and hold rallies, and democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui’s (蔣渭水) funeral was held here.
Hitting the big screen in September 1924, The Heavens are Cruel was financed by the Taiwan Daily News. It was a mostly Japanese production featuring just one Taiwanese actor, but one of the producers was Lee Shu (李書), who would serve as cinematographer for Whose Fault Is it?
BOX OFFICE FLOP
The Taiwan Film Research Association boasted about 30 founding members, including a few Japanese and two women, and tea magnate Lee Chun-sheng’s (李春生) grandson Lee Yan-shu (李延旭) was elected chairman on the first meeting. Ironically, Lee Yan-shu’s elder brother Lee Yan-shi (李延禧) was the director of the Niitaka Bank that had fired Liu for acting.
The group met regularly at Lee Yan-shu’s office, focusing on bringing to life Liu’s script for Whose Fault Is It? They studied films imported from China, and Lee Shu even traveled to Shanghai to hone his film-developing skills. Liu and several members took the directors’ seat.
“The men and women of the Taiwan Film Research Association have been enthusiastically researching [the art of filmmaking] … and our actors’ expressions have become quite natural,” the Taiwan Daily News article states. “We are pleased with the results of our on-site shooting, and the film’s lighting is bright.”
It particularly mentions lead actress Lien Yun-hsien (連雲仙): “She’s nimble and graceful, and has a rich range of facial expressions. Her every movement is convincingly real, and her skills are comparable to actresses in China. In fact, she may be even better.”
It’s not clear what happened to Liu after the disappointing reception of Whose Fault Is it?, and there would only be three more Taiwanese-produced films for the rest of the Japanese era, according to a National Taiwan Library document. This was also Lien’s only film credit.
Eirakuza continued to run as a multi-purpose performance space after World War II, particularly for Peking Opera.
In 1954, it started regularly screening movies, first showing the Hollywood blockbuster King Richard and the Crusaders, which was also a critical disappointment.
However, the old theater could no longer keep up with the state-of-the-art movie houses that sprung up in Taipei over the years, and it shuttered its doors in May 1960.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that either have anniversaries this week or are tied to current events.
Behind a car repair business on a nondescript Thai street are the cherished pets of a rising TikTok animal influencer: two lions and a 200-kilogram lion-tiger hybrid called “Big George.” Lion ownership is legal in Thailand, and Tharnuwarht Plengkemratch is an enthusiastic advocate, posting updates on his feline companions to nearly three million followers. “They’re playful and affectionate, just like dogs or cats,” he said from inside their cage complex at his home in the northern city of Chiang Mai. Thailand’s captive lion population has exploded in recent years, with nearly 500 registered in zoos, breeding farms, petting cafes and homes. Experts warn the
No one saw it coming. Everyone — including the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — expected at least some of the recall campaigns against 24 of its lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) to succeed. Underground gamblers reportedly expected between five and eight lawmakers to lose their jobs. All of this analysis made sense, but contained a fatal flaw. The record of the recall campaigns, the collapse of the KMT-led recalls, and polling data all pointed to enthusiastic high turnout in support of the recall campaigns, and that those against the recalls were unenthusiastic and far less likely to vote. That
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
Aug. 4 to Aug. 10 When Coca-Cola finally pushed its way into Taiwan’s market in 1968, it allegedly vowed to wipe out its major domestic rival Hey Song within five years. But Hey Song, which began as a manual operation in a family cow shed in 1925, had proven its resilience, surviving numerous setbacks — including the loss of autonomy and nearly all its assets due to the Japanese colonial government’s wartime economic policy. By the 1960s, Hey Song had risen to the top of Taiwan’s beverage industry. This success was driven not only by president Chang Wen-chi’s
RSS