Less than an hour after VIPs filed into Venice’s Giardini to view the opening of Venice’s 59th Art Biennale, a lone man in a dark overcoat unfurled a sign in front of an empty building normally used by Russia to show art. The sign read, in part: “I AM STANDING HERE IN FRONT OF THE RUSSIAN PAVILION AGAINST THE WAR AND AGAINST RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT CULTURAL TIES.”
He was quickly surrounded by a phalanx of Italian policemen who blocked the sign and then had him roll it up. A representative from the Biennale’s press office did not immediately respond to calls or e-mails requesting comment.
Speaking over the shoulders of the police officers, the man identified himself as Vadim Zakharov, a Russian artist who showed his work in the pavilion in 2013.
Photo: EPA-EFE
“I think at least, people should be thinking about what they’re doing now, when Russians are bombing women and kids,” he said. “Propaganda may be more dangerous than bombs. Bombs kill some people, but propaganda kills millions.”
After answering questions from reporters, Zakharov, who now lives in Berlin, walked into the crowd. An hour later, looking slightly dazed, he bumps into one of the journalists and gestured dismissively at the throngs of expensively dressed people wandering through the Venetian garden.
“Nobody wants to think about bad things,” he says.
Photo: AFP
A LONG LEAD
The international exhibition, which was delayed a year because of COVID, will officially open to the public on April 23 and run through Nov. 27. During that time, 80 national pavilions, some sprinkled through the city and others set in gracious, architecturally distinct pavilions within the Giardini grounds, will hold art exhibits.
In addition, a colossal, curated exhibition will be split between a space inside the Giardini parklands and the nearby, massive former shipbuilding warehouse known as the Arsenale. For this Biennale edition, that show, titled The Milk of Dreams and curated by Cecilia Alemani, includes work from more than 200 artists from 58 countries. On top of all that, a mixture of foundations, museums, galleries and even some private individuals will put forth dozens — perhaps hundreds — of additional shows across Venice. (The most spectacular is an exhibit of absolutely massive panels installed by the German artist Anselm Kiefer in the Doge’s Palace, which has quickly become the week’s must-see show.)
Photo: AFP
This is, in other words, a massive undertaking, one that takes years of planning, organization and preparation. And it’s freighted with meaning beyond just the art world: these are pavilions designed, historically, to telegraph soft power.
Given that lead time, it’s not — or at least, shouldn’t be — particularly nimble.
Yet, once the two artists slated to exhibit in the Russian Federation Pavilion backed out in protest in late February — “there is no place for art when civilians are dying under the fire of missiles,” wrote Kirill Savchenkov in an Instagram post — it became clear that this Biennale would be different than its predecessors. And while the overt nationalism of the last Bienniale presaged Putin’s war, until previews this week, what wasn’t clear was how different it would be.
LAST-MINUTE CHANGES
Some of the changes are explicit, such as a last-minute installation by Ukrainian artists in the Giardini featuring a tower of sandbags reminiscent of those used to protect national monuments.
Others are more subtle. For instance, in The Milk of Dreams, wall text for an artwork by the Ukrainian artist Maria Prymachenko notes that while she “faced the horrors of the Second World War and, eventually, witnessed the Chernobyl nuclear disaster,” the gravest threat to her art “dates to last February when, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, many of her works risked being lost forever in the bombing of the Ivankiv Museum, in which they were stored.”
The war has also seeped into exhibitions that weren’t explicitly designed to take it into account, creating opaque, albeit effective, moments. Take a piece by the artist Tomo Savi-Gecan, who represents this year’s Croatian Pavilion and who designed a work that became infused with unlikely pathos when Russia began its invasion.
Savi-Gecan chose not to use a physical space; instead, he spent a year and a half developing an algorithm that would pull a news headline from one of 250 sources every day. The program then feeds the headline to five performers with earpieces, telling them where they should perform that day, what their movements should be, and how long they should perform. (Most performances will take place inside other national pavilions, so the performers won’t have to spend seven months sprinting back and forth across Venice and its canals.)
Given that the Russian invasion currently dominates front pages around the world, Wednesday’s prompt, chosen randomly from Italy’s La Repubblica was, unsurprisingly, about “brutal attacks” in Mariupol, Ukraine’s most battered city. Performers entered the Finnish Pavilion unannounced, and almost imperceptibly began a series of subtle, choreographed steps that could only occasionally be distinguished from the movements of other visitors. This was nothing as literal as acting out a bombing, but — taken as a response to an unfolding atrocity — the work was surprisingly moving.
But the headline could have easily been about something more banal.
“I have a lot of problems with the kind of ‘look’ of solidarity that is so prevalent,” says Elena Filipovic, the director and curator of Kunsthalle Basel in Switzerland and the curator of this year’s Croatian Pavilion, referencing the fact that at the same time Russia invaded Ukraine, the US started bombing again in Syria. “But everyone was only talking about one war and not the other.”
Reminding viewers of how and why they’re fed information, she continues, is exactly the point of Savi-Gecan’s artwork.
“I don’t know that art can stop a war, but art can make us talk about all the things that we can control in the world, and the things we should be doing to be better informed,” she says.
MAKING AN IMPACT
Some events surrounding the Biennale are intended for a more direct, tangible impact to help Ukrainian artists, civilians and cultural institutions.
Notably, the art collector Francesca Thyssen-Bornemisza’s TBA21 foundation has banded together with Brant Foundation and Therme Art to organize a last-minute auction in support of Ukraine. Proceeds will go to a range of charities, from 100% Life, which supports Ukrainians living with HIV, to the Ukrainian Emergency Art Fund, which provides financial aid to Ukraine’s cultural workers.
“This fundraiser was basically put together in the last two weeks,” says Thyssen-Bornemisza. “I reached out to all the artists in my collection and asked them to donate works, and Peter Brant did the same.”
Artists with work in the auction include market stars David Salle, Richard Prince and Josh Smith. Organizers decline to give an estimate for what the auction might raise, but sales of the 59 pieces in the auction could easily exceed US$1 million.
The Web site for the fundraiser, which will be held in Venice’s ornate Scuola Grande Di San Rocco on Thursday, just went live on Wednesday morning.
“This is something that will be very, very successful,” Thyssen-Bornemisza continues. “I’m sure it will be, because everyone’s heart is in it.”
In the meantime, the whirl of openings, concerts, dinners, parties, unveilings and performances will continue in Venice for the week.
Zakharov, the artist who protested, is likely to miss them: He plans to stay in the city for only two days. “The west still thinks that after a few months this will be done,” he says with a shrug. “It’s so naive.”
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Few scenes are more representative of rural Taiwan than a mountain slope covered in row upon row of carefully manicured tea plants. Like staring at the raked sand in a Zen garden, seeing these natural features in an unnaturally perfect arrangement of parallel lines has a certain calming effect. Snapping photos of the tea plantations blanketing Taiwan’s mountain is a favorite activity among tourists but, unfortunately, the experience is often rather superficial. As these tea fields are part of working farms, it’s not usually possible to walk amongst them or sample the teas they are producing, much less understand how the
The worsening rivalry between the world’s two most powerful countries that has in recent years spread across the world, has now extended beyond the terrestrial, into the realms of the celestial. As China has become deeply enmeshed in strategic competition with the US — while edging towards outright hostilities with other regional neighbors — Washington’s alarm at the pace of its advancement in space is growing ever-louder. Beijing has made no secret over its ambitions and a spate of recent successful space missions has shown that the government’s rhetoric is backed by technological advances. On Friday, China launched a robotic spacecraft on a