Japan has broken with years of precedent in its tough response to the Ukraine invasion, and the conflict could reshape Tokyo’s defense strategy as it confronts China’s regional ambitions, analysts say.
When Russia last pushed into Ukraine in 2014, Japan’s response was seen as lukewarm, but this time around it has marched in lockstep with Western allies on unprecedented sanctions and tough rhetoric, even sending non-lethal military aid.
And the crisis is already impacting debates on security spending and capacity in a country whose constitution limits its military to defense.
Photo: EPA-EFE
“Japan has been accused before of paying its way out, in a way, just giving money but not being directly involved in any crisis,” said Valerie Niquet, an Asia expert at France’s Foundation for Strategic Research think tank.
This time, Tokyo is “putting a lot of emphasis on what they are doing... to show that they are not just sitting by and waiting to see how things will evolve”.
And the speed with which Tokyo has moved on measures such as individual sanctions has been “completely remarkable,” said Tobias Harris, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.
Photo: Reuters
“This is much further than I thought we would see the Japanese government go.”
In part, that reflects the extraordinary nature of the conflict, but several other key factors are at play, including the departure of former prime minister Shinzo Abe, who long sought closer ties with Moscow.
Abe, who resigned in 2020, had hoped warmer relations would lead to a breakthrough over disputed islands held by Russia, which Moscow calls the Kurils and Japan calls the Northern Territories.
But with Abe gone and years of deadlock on the dispute, Japan’s government has felt freer to act against Moscow, though fears about energy needs have so far stopped Tokyo from pulling out of joint energy projects with Russia.
EYE ON CHINA
Looming even larger though is China, with its growing ambitions in the region, including its desire to “reunify” Taiwan and its claims to disputed islands it calls the Diaoyu, known as the Senkaku in Japan.
In the past, Tokyo worried aggressive actions on Russia could push Moscow into Beijing’s arms, said James Brown, an associate professor of political science at Tokyo’s Temple University.
“Now however, that’s completely flipped around,” he said.
Instead, the view is that “Japan has to be tough on Russia, because otherwise it sets a precedent, and perhaps encourages China to think that they could do the same thing.”
In the immediate term, Japan is expected to completely overhaul its view of Russia in its National Security Strategy due later this year.
“Definitely Russia will be very much described as a threat,” said Niquet. “In the last one, in 2013, Russia was seen more as, if not an opportunity, certainly not a threat. That will change completely.”
NUCLEAR-SHARING DISCUSSION
And the Ukraine crisis is likely to strengthen the hand of those calling for more defense spending.
In campaigning last year, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party set a long-term goal of raising the defense budget to more than two percent of GDP, up from its traditional one percent.
That is “now something that they can realistically push towards”, said Brown.
Discussion of obtaining a strike capacity such as attack drones that could carry out first strikes against an enemy has been controversial given the constitutional limits on Japan’s military.
But “the images we’ve seen out of Ukraine are going to be useful for people who want Japan to have a more robust national defense,” Harris said.
“Self-defense is going to look increasingly like a fig leaf, I suspect.”
Even more controversially, Japan’s ruling party is set to debate nuclear deterrence, after suggestions from lawmakers including Abe that the possibility of “nuclear-sharing” be considered.
That is likely to remain a bridge too far, at least for now.
While Japan relies on the US nuclear umbrella, its long-standing policy bars it from producing, possessing or hosting the weapons.
But even a discussion of the issue in a country that suffered the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bomb attacks indicates the far-reaching effects of the Ukraine crisis.
“I think we haven’t seen fully the impact this war will have on Japan’s internal discussions,” Harris said.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Last week the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said that the budget cuts voted for by the China-aligned parties in the legislature, are intended to force the DPP to hike electricity rates. The public would then blame it for the rate hike. It’s fairly clear that the first part of that is correct. Slashing the budget of state-run Taiwan Power Co (Taipower, 台電) is a move intended to cause discontent with the DPP when electricity rates go up. Taipower’s debt, NT$422.9 billion (US$12.78 billion), is one of the numerous permanent crises created by the nation’s construction-industrial state and the developmentalist mentality it
Experts say that the devastating earthquake in Myanmar on Friday was likely the strongest to hit the country in decades, with disaster modeling suggesting thousands could be dead. Automatic assessments from the US Geological Survey (USGS) said the shallow 7.7-magnitude quake northwest of the central Myanmar city of Sagaing triggered a red alert for shaking-related fatalities and economic losses. “High casualties and extensive damage are probable and the disaster is likely widespread,” it said, locating the epicentre near the central Myanmar city of Mandalay, home to more than a million people. Myanmar’s ruling junta said on Saturday morning that the number killed had
RSS