In Taiwan, as in other countries that have experienced rapid industrialization, one downside of development has been the degradation of its rivers.
To some extent, this has been a result of people turning their backs on the streams that watered their ancestors’ fields and the creeks where their grandmothers washed clothes. Once tap water was available, and road bridges crossed major waterways, urban residents no longer had any reason to think about rivers — unless they needed a place to dump waste that couldn’t be burned.
Industrial, agricultural and municipal pollution has done enormous damage to riparian ecosystems, or river banks. Heavy use of ammonium-based fertilizers was a factor in the decline of the freshwater Taiwan Clam (Corbicula fluminea formosa). This species was formerly so abundant that, when country folks talked of achieving two goals with one action or killing two birds with one stone, they’d say in Hoklo (the language also known as Taiwanese) “gathering clams while washing your pants in the stream.”
Photo: Steven Crook
Just how polluted are Taiwan’s waterways? According to the Environmental Protection Administration’s (EPA) Department of Water Quality Protection, of the country’s 2,934km of streams and rivers, 68.1 percent were non-polluted in 2020. In the same year, 9.3 percent were lightly polluted, 19.3 percent were moderately polluted, and 3.3 percent were heavily polluted. EPA data shows very slight improvement between 2007 and 2019.
An Oct. 2018 paper in the academic journal Water examined monitoring-station data for 14 major rivers, and concluded that pollution was almost ubiquitous throughout the 2002-2016 period. Concentrations of lead exceeding the EPA standard limit were found in the Dongshan (冬山), Jhuoshuei (濁水) and Sinhuwei (新虎尾) rivers. The permissible copper level was exceeded in the Dahan (大漢), Laojie (老街) and Erren (二仁) rivers. All 14 rivers were tainted with manganese.
March 14 will be the 25th International Day of Action for Rivers. Once again, this cross-border expression of solidarity and concern will go unmarked in Taiwan.
Photo courtesy of Liao Kuei-hsien
Even so, plenty of Taiwanese express concern about the state of local waterways. Among them is Liao Kuei-hsien (廖桂賢), an associate professor in National Taipei University’s Graduate Institute of Urban Planning and convener of the Taiwan Rivers Network (台灣河溪網), an NGO that works to promote the protection and restoration of river health.
TREATING ‘GREY WATER’
According to Liao, pollution is one of two major challenges facing Taiwan’s rivers.
Photo: Steven Crook
“Black water” (waste water from toilets) is almost always treated before discharge, often by septic tanks. However, she points out, what’s called “grey water” is often released untreated into streams and rivers. Because it comes from bathrooms and washing machines, grey water typically contains traces of human waste.
Liao applauds the efforts made by many local governments to increase the percentage of grey water that’s treated. However, she says, they still need to work harder to increase the rate of domestic waste water treatment.
Data from the Ministry of the Interior’s Construction and Planning Agency show that sewage treatment rates earlier this year in the six special municipalities ranged from 94 percent (in New Taipei) to 59 percent (in Tainan). Several local governments reported rates below 50 percent, the lowest being in Chiayi County (21.5 percent) and Taitung County (17 percent).
Photo courtesy of Liao Kuei-hsien
Sewage systems aren’t as visible as bridges or cultural venues, and “elected politicians tend to ignore this issue because it isn’t sexy,” Liao says. “The central government needs to provide greater incentives to local governments to do this, and voters need to be better educated to understand the importance of waste water treatment,” she adds.
More toxic pollution escapes from industrial sites and feedlots (buildings in which animals or poultry are raised). Waste water from those places should be treated before being released, but, as Liao points out, illegal discharges which turn streams bizarre colors still occur from time to time.
“The current fines are not a deterrent,” she explains. “In most of Taiwan’s waterways, we see the dominance of non-native, pollution-tolerant species such as tilapia, striped snakehead and Amazon sailfin catfish,” says Liao, describing the last of these as “extremely invasive.”
‘THREE SMOOTH SIDES’ ENGINEERING
Native species struggle to survive not merely due to pollution, but also because “morphological modification” — human-induced changes to the shape and direction of river channels — undermines the health of local waterways.
“In the name of flood control, or for soil and water conservation, it’s very common to see streams or smaller rivers cased fully in concrete,” she says. According to Liao, this form of river engineering — known locally as sanmianguang (三面光, “three smooth sides”) — “basically destroys the entire stream ecosystem.”
The waters, bed and banks of an unpolluted and unmodified river are likely to host amphibians such as frogs, crustaceans and mollusks, fish, and insects, as well as various plants and microorganisms. These in turn support bird and reptile populations.
Due to growing ecological awareness on the part of engineers and the public, the authorities are less likely than before to convert sections of river into fully concreted channels.
The Public Construction Commission recognizes the disadvantages of “three smooth sides” and “two smooth sides” engineering. Its Web site points out that concreted channels don’t necessarily protect nearby communities from flooding, because “all the features of natural rivers are eliminated, so floodwater velocity increases.”
What’s more, it says, they hinder ground water recharge, exacerbating Taiwan’s water shortages.
“Streams which escape being fully cased in concrete often have their natural banks turned into revetments, usually in concrete or riprap. This means the elimination of the entire riparian zone — the interface of land and water — which is very important for the stream ecosystem,” Liao says.
What’s more, she explains, modifying river banks in this way disrupts the connection between waterways and their floodplains. Very often, there’s a decrease in habitat heterogeneity and, as a result, a reduction in overall biodiversity.
Horizontal structures, like check dams built to slow water velocity and reduce erosion, “seriously impede upstream-downstream connections, affecting migration of fish and other creatures up and down the river,” says Liao.
Dams were probably a factor in the decline of the Formosan landlocked salmon. Such barriers stop fish that get washed downstream during typhoons from returning to cooler waters where they could survive, and divide populations into isolated groups, increasing the risk of inbreeding. As part of efforts to save the salmon from extinction, a handful of check dams in Shei-Pa National Park (雪霸國家公園) have been demolished.
FLOOD SAFETY
Liao says Taiwan’s larger rivers are relatively less modified in the sense that, while they are contained by levees, they have wider corridors to ensure floodwaters are carried to the sea. Floodplain zones outside the levees, however, are often heavily modified, with natural vegetation removed. Around Taipei, many floodplain areas have been converted into parking lots and sports grounds.
“To address the problem of morphological modification, the root cause — the entrenched belief that rivers must be engineered or controlled for flood safety — needs to be addressed. However, this is very difficult,” says Liao.
Liao says that flood engineering is an unsustainable approach to flood safety. Nurturing flood resilience is much more important in the face of extreme precipitation events. In the long term, she adds, we’ll have to change the flood mitigation paradigm from flood control to flood resilience.
RIVER RESTORATION MOVEMENT
In the mid-term, Liao calls for a countrywide river-restoration movement that would “restore the health of river ecosystems so they can provide multiple ecosystem services. Where necessary, we should release streams and rivers from hard structures such as revetments and flow-impeding structures. To control flooding and erosion, we can deploy ecological engineering methods and nature-based solutions instead of hard engineering.”
She says that, while the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Water Resources Agency (WRA) and local-government units claim to pay attention to ecological issues, “often their understanding of ecology is superficial.”
The Facebook group “Urban Rivers and Streams” (城鄉河溪論壇) highlighted a recent case in which a government agency botched a so-called “river improvement project.”
During the modification of part of Dahu Creek (大湖) in Yilan County’s Yuanshan Township (員山) by the WRA’s First River Management Office, a riverside vegetation belt that should have been preserved was eradicated.
It appears that preservation measures weren’t made clear in the contract and related diagrams; changes to the plan weren’t checked and confirmed with stakeholders; ecological inspection data after August last year was left blank; and records relating to the public participation phase may have been falsified.
The Dahu Creek project (budget: NT$40.7 million) is just a small part of what’s become a big industry. NT$183 million has been set aside for reconstruction of the middle and lower reaches of Sanye Creek (三爺) in Tainan. On Jan. 20 this year, United Daily News reported that work was about to begin on a section of Hutou Creek (虎頭), also in Tainan, with the first phase expected to cost NT$400 million.
A new approach to Taiwan’s waterways is possible, but only if the country’s leaders are willing to upset a few apple carts.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
Recently the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its Mini-Me partner in the legislature, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), have been arguing that construction of chip fabs in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is little more than stripping Taiwan of its assets. For example, KMT Legislative Caucus First Deputy Secretary-General Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) in January said that “This is not ‘reciprocal cooperation’ ... but a substantial hollowing out of our country.” Similarly, former TPP Chair Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) contended it constitutes “selling Taiwan out to the United States.” The two pro-China parties are proposing a bill that
March 9 to March 15 “This land produced no horses,” Qing Dynasty envoy Yu Yung-ho (郁永河) observed when he visited Taiwan in 1697. He didn’t mean that there were no horses at all; it was just difficult to transport them across the sea and raise them in the hot and humid climate. “Although 10,000 soldiers were stationed here, the camps had fewer than 1,000 horses,” Yu added. Starting from the Dutch in the 1600s, each foreign regime brought horses to Taiwan. But they remained rare animals, typically only owned by the government or
It starts out as a heartwarming clip. A young girl, clearly delighted to be in Tokyo, beams as she makes a peace sign to the camera. Seconds later, she is shoved to the ground from behind by a woman wearing a surgical mask. The assailant doesn’t skip a beat, striding out of shot of the clip filmed by the girl’s mother. This was no accidental clash of shoulders in a crowded place, but one of the most visible examples of a spate of butsukari otoko — “bumping man” — shoving incidents in Japan that experts attribute to a combination of gender
Last month, media outlets including the BBC World Service and Bloomberg reported that China’s greenhouse gas emissions are currently flat or falling, and that the economic giant appears to be on course to comfortably meet Beijing’s stated goal that total emissions will peak no later than 2030. China is by far and away the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, generating more carbon dioxide than the US and the EU combined. As the BBC pointed out in their Feb. 12 report, “what happens in China literally could change the world’s weather.” Any drop in total emissions is good news, of course. By
RSS