Covert meetings, whispered threats and mysterious phone calls — warnings of reprisals by authorities from shadowy messengers are hounding Hong Kong’s civil society as China flattens a pro-democracy movement.
Unlike the Chinese mainland, Hong Kong long hosted a vibrant landscape of citizens’ groups who cultivated rights advocacy, union mobilization and civil disobedience as a key fabric of the once-outspoken city.
But a national security law imposed by Beijing in 2020 to snuff out dissent has knee-capped the sector, leaving people fearful that the law’s vaguely defined crimes will be used to target their work.
Photo: AFP
More than 50 civil society groups specializing on issues ranging from labor to education have since announced their closure or been shuttered after national security arrests.
Often the pre-emptive shutdowns came after staff were subjected to a shadowy campaign of threats and intimidation, according to five people with firsthand knowledge.
The warnings typically arrived via phone calls and messages from so-called “middlemen,” who assumed a conversational tone while revealing knowledge of each recipient’s personal life. Some came face to face.
Veteran NGO worker Mario — using a pseudonym due to fears for his safety — said his colleagues received disconcerting messages from several middlemen last summer.
“They would tell you different stories but at some point the conversation would reach the same conclusion: you must shut down,” he said.
A month after first contact, Mario’s organization made the decision to close.
‘WE RESPECT CIVIL SOCIETY’
Hong Kong’s civil society groups have in recent years been labeled “anti-China elements” by officials and state media.
Beijing has made clear it believes they were a key part of democracy protests that exploded in 2019 with huge rallies and frequent clashes with police. The national security law’s vague language, combined with the middlemen’s warnings, suddenly made the threat of lengthy jail terms very real for people like Mario.
“Every normal thing civil society did in the past three decades is now subject to political reprisal,” he said.
Shuttered organizations range from the city’s largest trade union to Amnesty International, as well as the Hong Kong Alliance — which used to organize the annual vigil remembering victims of China’s Tiananmen Square crackdown in 1989.
Hong Kong’s leader Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) has repeatedly denied that a deliberate campaign targeting organizations is taking place, insisting “we respect civil society.”
China’s ruling Communist Party and its Liaison Office in Hong Kong have openly accused some groups of violating the law, calling the collapse of these organizations “a choice of their own making.”
Both China’s Public Security Ministry and its Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office did not respond to requests for comment.
The city’s Security Bureau and the Committee for Safeguarding National Security also declined to comment on what they called “allegations by individuals.”
NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN
Under a “One Country, Two Systems” principle that Beijing agreed to before the 1997 handover by Britain, Hong Kong was allowed to retain key freedoms and autonomy for 50 years.
These included the city being left to police itself using its own laws.
The national security law changed all that, toppling the legal firewall that existed between the financial hub and Beijing.
Among the legislation’s many precedent-setting provisions was a clause empowering the mainland’s security apparatus to operate openly in Hong Kong.
Days after the law’s enactment, mainland security officials requisitioned a hotel for their staff — unbound by local laws — as they conducted investigations on perceived threats to China.
The middlemen are regarded as an extension of this new sheriff in town, according to two sources who said they had been contacted directly.
Both described similar face-to-face meetings but asked for key details to be omitted to maintain anonymity. The meetings were held in a pre-booked private room at public businesses and featured a Cantonese-speaking man claiming to be a mainland security agent. The conversations stayed largely polite but could flip — with one source saying the agent he met sounded at times “as if he was interrogating me.”
Another said the middleman asked what he thought about disbanding his group, citing various possible security law breaches.
“At first I thought it would be silly to disband when we didn’t know what offenses we have committed,” he said. “But when he could name a very specific charge, we started to worry.”
The messengers possessed personal information, both recalled, dropping details of their relatives and daily habits into conversation.
It wasn’t possible to independently verify the sources’ accounts.
‘APPROACH OF INTIMIDATION’
The use of middlemen to channel information and deliver political messages is not new. Beijing’s presence in Hong Kong is maintained through the Liaison Office, which has played an increasingly prominent advisory role in recent years — at times calling in local establishment politicians to be briefed by Chinese officials.
For opposition figures, Beijing preferred using middlemen, according to Ted Hui (許志?), a former opposition lawmaker now in Australia.
Such meetings were commonplace — mainly as intelligence-gathering for authorities’ decisions — until one year before the 2019 protests, he said.
“But after the security law came in, it became an approach of intimidation... So under the table, they can send those middlemen to say things the government cannot openly say.”
More than 160 people have been arrested under the national security law so far — most of them opposition politicians, journalists and rights workers.
Against the backdrop of these detentions, the slow-burn whisper campaign has been an effective tool to shut down organizations critical of the government.
“We are so inexperienced that many of us decided to disband under these threats,” said Connie, a rights worker who said she received a call from a stranger giving her a deadline to quit.
Oliver, another rights worker, said he got a text message from someone posing as a “friend” warning he could be arrested.
With so many other groups shuttering and new arrests each month, Oliver felt compelled to take the threat seriously and decided to fold. “If all those big groups... were not spared, how could you be?”
If one asks Taiwanese why house prices are so high or why the nation is so built up or why certain policies cannot be carried out, one common answer is that “Taiwan is too small.” This is actually true, though not in the way people think. The National Property Administration (NPA), responsible for tracking and managing the government’s real estate assets, maintains statistics on how much land the government owns. As of the end of last year, land for official use constituted 293,655 hectares, for public use 1,732,513 hectares, for non-public use 216,972 hectares and for state enterprises 34 hectares, yielding
The small platform at Duoliang Train Station in Taitung County’s Taimali Township (太麻里) served villagers from 1992 to 2006, but was eventually shut down due to lack of use. Just 10 years later, the abandoned train station had become widely known as the most beautiful station in Taiwan, and visitors were so frequent that the village had to start restricting traffic. Nowadays, Duoliang Village (多良) is known as a bit of a tourist trap, with a mandatory, albeit modest, admission fee of NT$10 giving access to a crowded lane of vendors with a mediocre view of the ocean and the trains
The March/April volume of Foreign Affairs, long a purveyor of pro-China pablum, offered up another irksome Beijing-speak on the issues and solutions for the problems vexing the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the US: “America and China at the Edge of Ruin: A Last Chance to Step Back From the Brink” rang the provocative title, by David M. Lampton and Wang Jisi (王緝思). If one ever wants to describe what went wrong with US-PRC relations, the career of Wang Jisi is a good place to start. Wang has extensive experience in the US and the West. He was a visiting
One of the challenges with the sheer availability of food in today’s world is that lots of us end up spending many of our waking hours eating. Whether it’s full meals, snacks or desserts, scientists have found that it’s not uncommon for us to be mindlessly grazing at some point during all of our 16 or so waking hours. The problem? As soon as this food hits the bloodstream in the form of glucose, it initiates the release of the hormone insulin. This in turn activates a switch present in every one of our cells, which is responsible for driving cell
RSS