In almost every part of the world, the mean sea level (MSL) is rising for three reasons, all of which are linked to the planet getting hotter. Firstly, water expands as it heats up. Secondly, glaciers around the world are in retreat. Thirdly, the ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica are shrinking, and scientists fear they could collapse with catastrophic consequences for oceanfront cities throughout the world.
In August last year, the Taiwan branch of Greenpeace, the global non-governmental environmental organization, warned that, by 2050, close to 4 percent of the country’s land could be inundated due to rising sea levels.
Greenpeace’s statements were widely reported in local media, including the Taipei Times. The NGO’s claim that Tainan is likely to be the first of several cities and counties to suffer serious losses is backed by online sea-level simulators like: flood.firetree.net.
Photo: Steven Crook
Not only are the seas rising, but the speed with which they’re rising is increasing. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Web site, the annual average increase in global MSL between 1880 and 2013 was 1.5mm. Since 1993, however, the average rise per year has been 3 to 3.6mm.
Moreover, the rate varies from one region to another. The reasons for this include subsidence (a serious problem in parts of southwestern Taiwan), ocean currents and what’s called “Ice Age Rebound” — the speed at which land lifts or sinks as it recovers from compression due to the immense weight of glaciation.
SEA LEVEL RISE: A COMPLICATED PICTURE
Photo: Steven Crook
Last year, Greenpeace asserted that the MSL around Taiwan is rising at double the global average. This claim has been repeated by several media outlets, but the scientific picture is more complicated.
According to the summary of Taiwan Climate Change Science Report 2017: Physical Phenomena and Mechanisms (authored by experts from Academia Sinica, National Taiwan University and other institutions): “From 1993 to 2012, the sea-level rise rate in the western Pacific was about three times higher than the global average, while the rate in the eastern Pacific was below the global average.”
The 554-page report’s section on rising seas cites several sets of data. One, published by the Central Weather Bureau in 2014 and based on tidal gauges at Kaohsiung, Keelung, Suao and Tamsui, showed that between 1994 and 2013, MSLs in those places rose by an average 3.4mm per year. The report notes this is “quite close to the global average sea level rise from 1993 to 2010 announced by the Fifth Assessment Report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of 2.8mm to 3.6mm per year.”
Photo: Steven Crook
Also referenced in the report was a study led by Tseng Yu-heng (曾于恒) of National Taiwan University’s Institute of Oceanography. Drawing on satellite altimetry data, Tseng’s team concluded that, at points in and near Taiwan (such as China’s Xiamen and Naha in Okinawa, Japan), sea levels rose by 5.3mm per year between 1993 and 2003. Their 2009 paper pointed out that this was roughly consistent with tide-gauge records, which had recorded an annual average rise of 5.7mm.
More recently, a team from National Taiwan Ocean University predicted that MSLs at four central Taiwan townships would rise by an average 2.8mm per year, or by a total 5.8cm, between last year and 2039. They categorized Wuci District (梧棲) in Taichung and three townships — Lukang (鹿港) in Changhua County and Mailiao (麥寮) and Taisi (臺西) in Yunlin County — as unusually susceptible to a rising ocean due to topography, subsidence and other factors.
On this issue, however, the devil isn’t in such details, but in the bigger picture.
Photo: Lu Hsien-hsiu, Taipei Times
The oceans are undoubtedly rising. As one of the world’s most densely populated countries, Taiwan can’t afford to lose dry land. Taiwanese therefore have compelling reasons to both drastically scale back their carbon dioxide emissions, and build resilience in low-lying communities.
The Projected Economic Impact of Extreme Sea-Level Rise in Seven Asian Cities in 2030 (published by Greenpeace in June) warns that large parts of Taiwan’s capital could soon be in danger of inundation if a storm surge coincides with torrential rainfall and a high tide: “About 17 percent of Taipei’s land area is below the level to which sea water could rise should a ten-year flood occur in 2030, under an RCP8.5 scenario [the so-called ‘business as usual’ scenario, in which humanity does little to curb climate change]... Datong District (大同) and Taipei Main Station could potentially be flooded.”
TYPHOON NARI: WAKE-UP CALL
In September 2001, Typhoon Nari gave Taipei residents a glimpse of that kind of future. After Nari, it took three months for the Taipei Metro to fully return to normal services.
Last year, a group of scientists alerted the authorities to the possibility that climate change could force the government to move out of Taipei.
One of them, Wang Chung-ho (汪中和), a researcher at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Earth Sciences, said that, as soon as the second half of the 21st century, the Taipei Basin could become “unsuitable for human settlement.” In the short term, Wang explained, embankments and dikes would prevent sea water from inundating the capital, but a rising ocean would make it ever more difficult for rainwater to drain from the basin, resulting in ever more serious waterlogging.
ACTION DOWN SOUTH
Recognizing the crisis that faces Taiwan’s coastal areas, Tainan is taking a proactive approach to the impact of extreme weather, says Hsieh Shih-chieh (謝世傑), director-general of the city government’s Environmental Protection Bureau.
Witnessed by representatives of Greenpeace, Tainan Mayor Huang Wei-che (黃偉哲) signed the Tainan Climate Emergency Declaration on May 11. The document sets out various targets for 2030, including boosting renewables, making the urban bus fleet 100-percent electric and cutting overall greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions by a further 20 percent.
Hsieh says that, between 2010 and 2019, Tainan’s overall GHG emissions fell by 21 percent, and that the city aims to become carbon neutral by 2050. (By comparison, London, Berlin and Madrid have lowered GHG emissions by around 30 percent since emissions peaked in those cities; Copenhagen has achieved a striking 61-percent cut.)
Other preparations for rising sea levels include the restoration of coastal sandbanks, clearing silt from lagoons, installing sensors on roads prone to flooding and adding automated pumping stations.
Asked if Tainan plans to build additional coastal defenses to hold back a rising ocean, Han Rong-hua (韓榮華), director of the city government’s Water Resources Bureau, says that the construction of seawalls is the responsibility of the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Water Resources Agency.
Han doesn’t expect sea water to intrude in the next few decades, saying the height of existing dikes along Tainan’s coastline is sufficient to hold back predicted high tides for the next 50 years. Rather than build new seawalls, he adds, the focus is on maintenance to ensure existing defenses function as intended.
In at least one sense, that’s good news. Constructing additional seawalls would involve pouring a great deal of concrete, and that in turn would add yet more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, exacerbating climate change and sea-level rise.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless