Joseph Liu chose Norway for his legal studies because he wanted to learn more about human rights. But instead, he’s been fighting the Norwegian government for the past four years for the right to use his national identity.
Following a diplomatic row with China in 2010, Norway changed the nationality of its Taiwanese residents to “Chinese.” Liu and others launched the My Name, My Right movement to raise funds and pressure the authorities to change the country designation back to Taiwan. They eventually took the case to the Norwegian supreme court, where they lost in November last year.
While the outcome wasn’t surprising, “we didn’t even have a chance to represent ourselves in court,” Liu says. “The judge just rejected us on grounds that our allegations were unfounded. I’m quite disappointed in Norway’s legal system.”
Photo courtesy of My Name, My Right
Liu and his team filed a lawsuit last month with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in France, where they now have to wait up to a year to see if the case is accepted due to the court’s enormous caseload. As of the end of April, there were about 65,000 pending cases.
If the ECHR rejects the lawsuit, Liu plans to either help Taiwanese in other countries who have similar issues, or bring the issue to the UN.
“It doesn’t matter if we win or not, but we need to keep speaking out,” he says. “If we remain silent, then it will become difficult in the future for Taiwanese to exercise their right to self-determination. Not saying anything means that we’ve quietly accepted the fact of being designated as Chinese.”
Photo courtesy of My Name, My Right
“If this lawsuit wins, it would be the first time for the European Court of Human Rights to make a decision related to national identity,” states a My Name, My Right press release. Since the ECHR is binding on the 47 member states that have signed the European Convention on Human Rights, it means that these countries could no longer register Taiwanese citizens as “Chinese.”
FALTERING TIES
Tensions between Norway and China rose in early 2010 after late Chinese democracy activist Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Shortly after that, Taiwanese in Norway were forced to identify as “Chinese” to demonstrate the government’s adherence to the one-China principle.
Photo courtesy of My Name, My Right
Taiwan currently has no representative office in Norway — it ceased to operate in 2017 and now all matters go through the office in Sweden.
“It’s really hard for us to make our voices heard,” Liu says. “There used to be a pro-Taiwan group in the parliament, but no longer. We can rally people, but we’re finding it hard to do the same in politics and push them to support some Taiwan-friendly policies.”
For the ECHR battle, Liu has recruited London-based lawyer Schona Jolly, who is chair of the Bar Human Rights Committee and has written about Chinese human rights issues.
Jill Marshall of the Department of Law and Criminology at Royal Holloway College, University of London, said that how a person’s identity is recorded on official documents is a very important matter. It simplifies the complex question of “who we are” into a few words on a document, which may affect people’s rights.
“The applicants are Taiwanese: failing to state this on their official documentation and instead ascribing them with an incorrect nationality misidentifies them and violates their right to personal identity. It is only just and fair that the ECHR acknowledges the violation that has occurred,” said Marshall, who is also the author of Human Rights Law and Personal Identity.”
RAISING TAIWAN’S PROFILE
Liu and his group launched an online fundraising campaign to support their lawsuits, receiving more than NT$3 million.
However, nothing they tried could get through to the courts. They were told that they had no sufficient grounds to their claim due to state policy toward China, and that the designation “would have no consequences and practical significance to their rights and obligations in Norway.”
There are obvious differences, however, as Taiwanese don’t need a visa to get into Norway while Chinese do. There are also different policies toward the two groups due to the vastly different conditions of their home countries.
“Growing up in Taiwan, it was ingrained in us that Taiwan and China are two different entities. China has been threatening Taiwan on all fronts these days, so registering me as “Chinese” is very offensive,” he says.
But Liu feels that popular sentiment has been changing over, as China expands its influence across the globe. When the Liu Xiaobo Incident broke out in 2010, most of Europe was still trying to cozy up to China for economic gain.
“They cast the Taiwan problem aside then because they wanted to be friends with China,” Liu says. “But people are starting to realize the vast differences in ideology and have become wary [of China] ... Technically, there’s little benefit to being nice to Taiwan. But people’s views of Taiwan have changed, especially with the attention it got during the epidemic. Our differences were emphasized in media reports and more people are aware of the problem now.”
Compared to four years ago, Liu has seen an increase in local Norwegians announcing their support for the lawsuit. This is exactly what Liu wants.
“The lawsuit is important. But even more important is that this is an opportunity for more people to know about Taiwan.”
For more information, visit www.facebook.com/TaiwanMyNameMyRight
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
RSS