Taiwan’s lucrative fishing industry has come under fire for subjecting its migrant workforce to forced labor and other abuses, contrasting with the government’s promotion of the democratic island as a regional human rights beacon.
Taiwan operates the second largest longline fishing fleet in the world with boats spending months — and sometimes years — crossing remote oceans to supply the seafood that ends up on our supermarket shelves. But those who work on its vessels — mostly poor migrants from the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam — paint a grim picture of punishing work hours, docked pay, months without family contact, regular beatings and even death at sea.
Last year the US added fish caught by Taiwan’s deep water fleets to its list of goods produced by forced labor for the first time.
Photo: AFP
It was an embarrassing moment for Taiwan, which shook off autocracy and markets itself as one of the region’s most progressive democracies.
Recent steps include becoming the first place in Asia to legalize gay marriage, a historic apology by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to Aboriginal communities and an ongoing campaign to address abuses of the Martial Law era. But there has been little headway in tackling labor abuses, especially within the US$3 billion fishing sector.
Migrant fishermen said they routinely had to work up to 21 hours a day, enduring verbal and physical abuse as well as zero communication with the outside world. When pay finally arrived, it was often lower than agencies promised.
Supri, who like many Indonesians uses just one name, said he was still traumatize by a stint on a Taiwanese fishing boat. The captain, he said, took an instant dislike to him, scolding him frequently, locking him in a freezer and ordering a crew member to shock him with a stun gun used to kill fish.
“All the while I kept thinking I wanted to go home,” he said. “I didn’t want to die. I wanted to see my family again.”
‘MODERN DAY SLAVERY’
In a survey of Indonesian fishermen published last year, the Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) found a quarter reported physical abuse on Taiwanese longline vessels, 82 percent worked excessive overtime hours and 92 percent had wages withheld.
Mohamad Romdoni, an EJF campaigner in Indonesia, said working conditions are “still terrifying” on Taiwanese boats — albeit marginally better than those on China’s fleet, the world’s largest.
“If the crew can still chew and swallow their food then they still have to work, even if they are sick,” he said.
Edwin Dela Cruz, president of the non-profit International Seafarers Action Centre in Manila, put it more starkly: “The labor conditions for fishermen on Taiwanese vessels is like modern day slavery.”
Filipino Marcial Gabutero came home from a long stint at sea to find his wife gone and his recruitment agency refusing to hand over four-fifths of his US$250 monthly wage.
The 27-year-old said he was often beaten with a broomstick but never dared to speak up.
“We were helpless, so we endured until we finished the contract,” he said.
The Seafood Working Group, a coalition of NGOs that monitors abuses within global fishing fleets, estimates some 23,000 people work on Taiwan’s deep water vessels.
Earlier this year it recommended Taiwan be downgraded in Washington’s annual human trafficking report, citing wage deductions, forced labor, murder and the disappearance at sea of migrant fishers.
“Investigations have consistently revealed egregious human rights abuses in Taiwan’s fishing industry,” researchers wrote.
FLAGS OF CONVENIENCE
The worst practices are found on Taiwan’s deep water fleets which operate outside of the island’s waters and many use “flags of convenience.”
Those ships are owned by Taiwanese but flagged to countries with fewer regulations. While deep water ships are expected to comply with Taiwanese hiring regulations there is no official inspection regime and no enforcement for those flying flags of convenience. Taiwan’s Fisheries Agency said it “doesn’t allow forced labor or human trafficking” and was working to “amend relevant regulations in a timely manner”.
The agency said it was planning to submit an “action plan” to the government, but could not give a date. Last week the Control Yuan said the fisheries department and other ministries had taken no concrete measures to address fishing abuses despite being aware of them.
Allison Lee, from the Yilan Migrant Fishermen Union, says officials have been reluctant to really solve abuses.
“The government is only sugarcoating and window-dressing the issue,” she said.
DEATHS AT SEA
Migrant workers have died on boats, often in suspicious circumstances. One death that sparked an international outcry was Indonesian fisherman Supriyanto in 2015. He was initially reported to have succumbed to an illness until harrowing personal testimony and video was smuggled out by his crewmates.
Lee, who has assisted Supriyanto’s family since his death, said the 47-year-old suffered frequent beatings at the hands of the Taiwanese captain who “hit his head with a fishing hook, cut his feet with a knife and encouraged others to smack him.”
No prosecutions have yet been made in that case.
A similar death occurred in 2019 when a 19-year-old Indonesian fishermen passed away a day after crewmates said he was struck by a Taiwanese officer.
“The captain wrapped up my dead friend’s body with a blanket and then stored him in the freezer,” an anonymous crew member said in testimony gathered by Greenpeace.
That vessel — the Da Wang — operates under a Vanuatu flag of convenience and the US has since placed it on a blacklist.
Last year it docked in Taiwan’s Kaohsiung city. Local prosecutors visited to inquire about the case but no departure ban was placed on the boat and it slipped back into international waters a month later.
Lee says cases like the Da Wang encapsulate the way Taiwan authorities are turning a blind eye to abuses.
“There are many problems with their treatment on board but there is no place for them to turn to for help,” she said.
Exceptions to the rule are sometimes revealing. For a brief few years, there was an emerging ideological split between the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) that appeared to be pushing the DPP in a direction that would be considered more liberal, and the KMT more conservative. In the previous column, “The KMT-DPP’s bureaucrat-led developmental state” (Dec. 11, page 12), we examined how Taiwan’s democratic system developed, and how both the two main parties largely accepted a similar consensus on how Taiwan should be run domestically and did not split along the left-right lines more familiar in
As I finally slid into the warm embrace of the hot, clifftop pool, it was a serene moment of reflection. The sound of the river reflected off the cave walls, the white of our camping lights reflected off the dark, shimmering surface of the water, and I reflected on how fortunate I was to be here. After all, the beautiful walk through narrow canyons that had brought us here had been inaccessible for five years — and will be again soon. The day had started at the Huisun Forest Area (惠蓀林場), at the end of Nantou County Route 80, north and east
Specialty sandwiches loaded with the contents of an entire charcuterie board, overflowing with sauces, creams and all manner of creative add-ons, is perhaps one of the biggest global food trends of this year. From London to New York, lines form down the block for mortadella, burrata, pistachio and more stuffed between slices of fresh sourdough, rye or focaccia. To try the trend in Taipei, Munchies Mafia is for sure the spot — could this be the best sandwich in town? Carlos from Spain and Sergio from Mexico opened this spot just seven months ago. The two met working in the
This month the government ordered a one-year block of Xiaohongshu (小紅書) or Rednote, a Chinese social media platform with more than 3 million users in Taiwan. The government pointed to widespread fraud activity on the platform, along with cybersecurity failures. Officials said that they had reached out to the company and asked it to change. However, they received no response. The pro-China parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), immediately swung into action, denouncing the ban as an attack on free speech. This “free speech” claim was then echoed by the People’s Republic of China (PRC),