Hong Kong satirists, cartoonists and journalists say self-censorship has already begun blunting critical voices as fears crescendo over China’s plan to impose a sweeping anti-subversion law on the restless city.
For a man whose career has revolved around making people laugh, Ng Chi-sum (吳志森) had little to smile about on Friday night.
Huddled around a television in a darkened studio, the comedian and a handful of colleagues watched the final episode of their satirical news show Headliner go live.
Photo: AFP
The program came to a close after a rebuke from regulators over a recent episode lampooning the police that prompted public broadcaster RTHK to end its 31-year run, pending a review of all future satirical line-up.
Ng said he and the team had ultimately become victims of China’s stated determination to restore order and instill patriotism in the semi-autonomous city.
“In this huge storm, Headliner is just a small stone that has been washed away,” he said after the final show aired, still dressed as a Qing dynasty empress, a character he frequently used to ridicule Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥).
Photo: AFP
“But there are larger waves coming and the rest of the news industry must get prepared.”
NO JOKE
A day after Headliner’s last show went out, China’s state-run Xinhua news agency published the first detailed report on what Hong Kong’s new national security legislation will look like. The law, which will bypass the city’s legislature, will criminalize subversion, secession, terrorism and colluding with foreign forces.
China will set up a “national security agency” within Hong Kong to “supervise” the prosecution of offenders, ending the tradition of local police and prosecutors having full jurisdiction over the city.
Beijing says the law will leave political freedoms intact and restore order after last year’s huge and often violent pro-democracy protests.
But critics fear an end to Hong Kong’s liberties given how similar national security laws are routinely used to crush dissent on the Chinese mainland.
“Now it feels like we are facing a major cleansing,” said Wong Kei-kwan (黃紀鈞), one of the city’s most prominent cartoonists.
Ridicule of the powerful is ingrained in Hong Kong’s culture, aided by Cantonese, a language often riotously colorful in its insults.
But that is something Wong, who uses the nom de plume “Zunzi” (尊子), believes Beijing is determined to stamp out.
“Jokes can be very dangerous,” he said. “The powerful try to justify and deify themselves, to make the masses believe there is no one else but them to follow. Jokes can quickly pierce through all this and nail the lies. They can drag the powerful down from their thrones.”
The sudden downfall of Headliner, he feels, was a canary in the coal mine moment for Hong Kong.
“It felt as if they stepped on a landmine and got blown up,” he said of the production team.
‘ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE’
Insiders at RTHK say journalists are already feeling pressure to change how they cover politics.
Last month the government formed a taskforce to review the broadcaster’s management and editorial output after pro-Beijing figures accused it of being too sympathetic to pro-democracy protests.
Gladys Chiu (趙善恩), head of the RTHK Program Staff Union, said senior management recently issued detailed new advice on how to cover the protests, including not zooming in too closely on flags from other countries or banners promoting independence for Hong Kong.
Reporters were also advised “not to repeat the slogans chanted by protesters,” she said.
In a statement, RTHK confirmed a meeting on the issue took place and said the broadcaster “should not be used as a platform to advocate Hong Kong independence.”
Expressing anti-government views has become increasingly risky in some workplaces. Teenagers at a secondary school recently protested after their teacher was fired for letting a student play a protest song in a music exam.
And a clothing store said it was ordered by a mall operator to remove a statue of a protester.
City leader Lam has described those critical of the security law as “enemies of the people” and warned civil servants they must not speak out against it.
Ng said it was increasingly difficult to find comedy in his satire and almost welcomed losing his job.
“What has happened in Hong Kong pains me, and it pains me even more when I have to turn it into jokes,” he sighed. “The end of the show is almost a relief for me. Because Hong Kong will only get worse.”
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS