Hong Kong satirists, cartoonists and journalists say self-censorship has already begun blunting critical voices as fears crescendo over China’s plan to impose a sweeping anti-subversion law on the restless city.
For a man whose career has revolved around making people laugh, Ng Chi-sum (吳志森) had little to smile about on Friday night.
Huddled around a television in a darkened studio, the comedian and a handful of colleagues watched the final episode of their satirical news show Headliner go live.
Photo: AFP
The program came to a close after a rebuke from regulators over a recent episode lampooning the police that prompted public broadcaster RTHK to end its 31-year run, pending a review of all future satirical line-up.
Ng said he and the team had ultimately become victims of China’s stated determination to restore order and instill patriotism in the semi-autonomous city.
“In this huge storm, Headliner is just a small stone that has been washed away,” he said after the final show aired, still dressed as a Qing dynasty empress, a character he frequently used to ridicule Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥).
Photo: AFP
“But there are larger waves coming and the rest of the news industry must get prepared.”
NO JOKE
A day after Headliner’s last show went out, China’s state-run Xinhua news agency published the first detailed report on what Hong Kong’s new national security legislation will look like. The law, which will bypass the city’s legislature, will criminalize subversion, secession, terrorism and colluding with foreign forces.
China will set up a “national security agency” within Hong Kong to “supervise” the prosecution of offenders, ending the tradition of local police and prosecutors having full jurisdiction over the city.
Beijing says the law will leave political freedoms intact and restore order after last year’s huge and often violent pro-democracy protests.
But critics fear an end to Hong Kong’s liberties given how similar national security laws are routinely used to crush dissent on the Chinese mainland.
“Now it feels like we are facing a major cleansing,” said Wong Kei-kwan (黃紀鈞), one of the city’s most prominent cartoonists.
Ridicule of the powerful is ingrained in Hong Kong’s culture, aided by Cantonese, a language often riotously colorful in its insults.
But that is something Wong, who uses the nom de plume “Zunzi” (尊子), believes Beijing is determined to stamp out.
“Jokes can be very dangerous,” he said. “The powerful try to justify and deify themselves, to make the masses believe there is no one else but them to follow. Jokes can quickly pierce through all this and nail the lies. They can drag the powerful down from their thrones.”
The sudden downfall of Headliner, he feels, was a canary in the coal mine moment for Hong Kong.
“It felt as if they stepped on a landmine and got blown up,” he said of the production team.
‘ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE’
Insiders at RTHK say journalists are already feeling pressure to change how they cover politics.
Last month the government formed a taskforce to review the broadcaster’s management and editorial output after pro-Beijing figures accused it of being too sympathetic to pro-democracy protests.
Gladys Chiu (趙善恩), head of the RTHK Program Staff Union, said senior management recently issued detailed new advice on how to cover the protests, including not zooming in too closely on flags from other countries or banners promoting independence for Hong Kong.
Reporters were also advised “not to repeat the slogans chanted by protesters,” she said.
In a statement, RTHK confirmed a meeting on the issue took place and said the broadcaster “should not be used as a platform to advocate Hong Kong independence.”
Expressing anti-government views has become increasingly risky in some workplaces. Teenagers at a secondary school recently protested after their teacher was fired for letting a student play a protest song in a music exam.
And a clothing store said it was ordered by a mall operator to remove a statue of a protester.
City leader Lam has described those critical of the security law as “enemies of the people” and warned civil servants they must not speak out against it.
Ng said it was increasingly difficult to find comedy in his satire and almost welcomed losing his job.
“What has happened in Hong Kong pains me, and it pains me even more when I have to turn it into jokes,” he sighed. “The end of the show is almost a relief for me. Because Hong Kong will only get worse.”
Ajay Verma, a consultant gastroenterologist at Kettering general hospital in Northamptonshire, says our gut is a “complex machine.” “It is constantly providing us with the nutrition we need, initially to grow and develop, and then for us to survive, thrive and repair from injury and illness.” How can we keep it functioning well? Put simply: “Make sure what you put into it is balanced, and that you clear out its waste products adequately,” Verma says. “In a general gastroenterology clinic, the most common conditions we see are irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), gastroesophageal reflux disease, inflammatory bowel disease and constipation,” says Nisha
And so, in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s trip to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), all the experts on the Strait of Hormuz suddenly became experts on US-China-Taiwan relations. The Internet has certainly expanded human knowledge. Lots of these sudden experts made noise this week about Trump’s words after the meeting with PRC dictator Xi Jin-ping (習近平). Trump is going to sell out Taiwan! Longtime Taiwan commentator J. Michael Cole summed the situation up neatly in the Guardian: “We need to keep in mind that he has a tendency to say many things — sometimes contradicting himself within
Last week US President Donald Trump was asked by a reporter whether he would speak on the phone to the President of Taiwan. “l’ll speak to him. I speak to everybody. We have that situation very well in hand,” Trump said. This marked the second time in a couple of weeks he had said he would talk to the President of Taiwan. In 2016 he famously took a call from then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), when he was president-elect. Despite warnings that the apocalypse was nigh because of a phone call, the world quickly forgot about the conversation between two democratically-elected presidents.
May 25 to May 31 Few believed that apples could be cultivated on a commercial scale in Taiwan’s high mountains. When horticulturalist Cheng Chao-hsiung (程兆熊) first proposed the idea in 1955, both American and Taiwanese colleagues dismissed it as implausible, arguing that temperate fruit could not be reliably grown on a subtropical island, especially on rugged terrain. However, it was this terrain in the Central Mountain Range where many Chinese Civil War veterans were resettled in the late 1950s. With limited job prospects and no family in Taiwan, they were placed on cooperative farms aimed toward self-sufficiency. Some say the conditions
RSS