Klaus Zimmerling was bored with his mechanical engineering job when the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall gave him the impetus to turn his life around.
“At first I didn’t believe it,” he said of the momentous event 30 years ago that led to German reunification a year later. “Then I slowly realized that things would change and it was the occasion to start something new.”
Ditching his job in Dresden, he retrained as a winegrower and invested in a parcel of land perched on the heights of the city. Today, the 60-year-old is the proud owner of a vineyard that produces vintages which have been served in Michelin star restaurants like Noma in Denmark.
Photo: AFP
Not just Zimmerling’s business but the entire winemaking industry in Saxony has seen a rebirth since German reunification.
While the end of the communist East largely spelled the collapse of the region’s industries, small-hold vineyards sprang up as state-owned farming cooperatives that once produced food for the masses were dissolved, split up and sold off to private owners.
Zimmerling counted among those who pounced on one of these parcels.
Recalling the early days of his business, he said: “What was best was the crazy feeling of freedom.”
Strolling among the grapevines planted along terraces in his vineyard on a warm autumn’s day, Zimmerling plucked off a grape, inspected it and smelled it before popping it into his mouth.
“These little grapes have a more intense flavour than the big ones. Look, they’re already almost orange. The taste will be fantastic,” he said, seemingly already tasting the Riesling to emerge.
‘IMPROVED QUALITY’
Wine production in the Elbe valley goes back more than 850 years. It saw its zenith between the 16th and 18th centuries but later crumbled under successive wars and the whims of the changing weather and river flows.
After World War II, wine production restarted during communist rule, with farming cooperatives put in charge of keeping it flowing for local restaurants.
Wine also served as a bartering tool, something that was common during the period, says Zimmerling.
But bottles that could be purchased in then East Germany were often imported from fellow Soviet bloc countries like Hungary.
“After reunification, things really developed,” according to the Saxony federation of the wine-growing sector. Several vineyards were sold and private properties created and, most crucially, “the quality of wine improved greatly”.
In May 1992, the Saxony wine route was inaugurated. Along 55km between Pira, Dresden, Meissen and Diesbar-Seusslitz, trails for hikers and bikers were cleaned up to help bring in tourists.
While Saxony’s wine-growing industry remains small, providing only 0.4 percent of total German production, it is attracting attention for its quality but also evoking a certain nostalgia for former easterners.
Hotels in the Elbe valley have reported bookings jumping from half a million in 1994 to 1.37 million last year, said local hotelier federation Elbland Dresden.
‘ARROGANCE’
Zimmerling, who purchased the vineyard in 1992 after completing an apprenticeship in an Austrian winegrowing region, grew his holding bit by bit.
Today, it covers about 4.5 hectares, on which he tries out a variety of grapes.
“I wanted first to make organic wine, but then also obtain quality that is unexpected for the region,” he said.
His business isn’t particularly profitable, he conceded, without divulging figures though he noted that his wife, a sculptor, brings more income home.
Today, he produces with a handful of employees about 15,000 litres of wine a year, including some that is prized among the best quality in Germany.
While most of his vintage is consumed locally, some makes its way to Poland, Denmark and even Japan.
Some is sold too in western German cities, but three decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall, Zimmerling bemoans that east German wine still suffers from an image problem.
“Until today, they refuse to admit in the west ... that wine produced in eastern Germany can be good,” he said, calling out a certain “arrogance.”
Thankfully, he added, “such prejudices don’t exist abroad.”
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS