We’ve heard enough about Fu Yue’s (傅榆) acceptance speech for best documentary at last November’s Golden Horse Awards, where she drew Chinese ire for stating that she hopes Taiwan can be treated as a truly independent entity. Now let’s look at the winning documentary.
On the surface, Our Youth in Taiwan follows a standard documentary format by following Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷) and Cai Boyi (蔡博藝) through a dramatic period of their lives. Chen becomes one of the leaders of the Sunflower movement and Cai, one of the first Chinese undergraduate students in Taiwan, participated in a number of social movements and wrote a popular book, I Am in Taiwan (我在臺灣，我正青春), about her experiences. The two know each other and appear at many of the same events, but they generally live out two parallel storylines. Chen openly expresses his distaste for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), while Cai is often the only Chinese student at student protests — even those that carry anti-China connotations.
Those who follow the news will know that these two characters’ blazing youth and meteoric rise to fame (or notoriety) was cut short by controversy, more of which below, and they faded into the background, never becoming the influential powers of social change Fu envisioned when she started filming them in 2011. But it seems that Fu is affected the most by their downfalls, as she had been living vicariously through Chen and Cai, who were doing things that she did not have the drive for. As such, Fu becomes just as part of the story, her narration often revealing her insecurities, personal thoughts and hopes for social change. She may not have their moxie, but she shares their persistence and idealism. It’s a gamble for the filmmaker to insert herself too much into the film — especially in this case where she clearly admires, and even envies her subjects — but on the other hand, it’s better to just admit it and make it part of the story.
Photo courtesy of atmovies.com
Fu admits to struggling with this, as she originally believed that a good documentary should just speak through the lens. But if she decided to take the alternative route, perhaps she could have even inserted herself more as her background is also complex. Fu is a second-generation Southeast Asian Chinese who fully identifies as Taiwanese and supports Taiwanese independence despite her family’s allegiance to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Surprisingly, little of this is mentioned in the film, as she plays herself off as a nobody following two rock stars around. Her background and personality could provide the third contrast between Chen and Cai, and could have sparked more insightful conversations between the three. Alas, Fu could not have known in the beginning as she didn’t decide to be part of the film until late in the editing process.
Somehow it still works, forming an interesting dynamic — the three don’t actually interact much on screen, but somehow it becomes a deeply personal account about the three of them, their youthful ambition and their changing attitudes and hopes toward realizing social change when faced with reality. This is why the film stands out from being just a recounting of a social movement — in fact, Fu missed the beginning of the March 2014 occupation of the Legislative Yuan — it’s more of a subtly emotive memoir and ode to those days of being naive and fearless.
Fu paints a well-balanced picture of Chen, not only capturing in his “heroic” moments screaming at the police or leading protests, but also filming him in his introspective private moments that reveal more about him as a complex character — especially when he ruminates on the internal conflicts that arose during the Sunflower movement, where protesters accused the leaders of not being democratic, and on his sexual harassment charges, even talking about how it felt when he committed the acts. But his story is all-too-familiar, a charismatic activist-turned-celebrity who carries a dark secret.
Photo courtesy of atmovies.com
Cai’s tale, on the other hand, is unheard of, as most Chinese students understandably would stay away from garnering too much attention in Taiwan, much less attend movements where she could be attacked just for her nationality. Her story of eventually running for Tamkang University student president and becoming a target of public wrath for just being Chinese could be a documentary on its own. Most people know Cai through her writing, and this is a chance to look at her motivations and struggles, why she would risk running afoul of Beijing to chase her Taiwan dreams, a place where she isn’t always welcome. Fu travels to China to see Cai several times, even capturing her arguing with her father, who urges her to keep a low profile and finally declares that it was a mistake to let her study in Taiwan.
Near the end of the film, Fu laments that things did not turn out as she had expected, but few documentary films go as planned anyway, and rarely do social movements fully achieve the intended results. In fact, like Fu, people tend to put too much hope in a social movement or its leaders to completely overturn things, but the realist knows that change takes decades. While Chen and Cai faded from the limelight, Fu did accompany them through their glorious run, and in fact Fu is lucky to have been able to find them before they became household names, gaining their trust early over those who became interested after the Sunflower movement.
It’s the process that matters, and Chen and Cai have made their mark in Taiwanese history. Taiwan’s civic society is still moving forward on the foundation they helped build, and meanwhile, Fu was able to save her film and win the top award. That’s not too bad for youthful ambition.
May 11 to May 17 Traversing the southern slopes of the Yushan Range in 1931, Japanese naturalist Tadao Kano knew he was approaching the last swath of Taiwan still beyond colonial control. The “vast, unknown territory,” protected by the “fierce” Bunun headman Dahu Ali, was “filled with an utterly endless jungle that choked the mountains and valleys,” Kano wrote. He noted how the group had “refused to submit to the measures of our authorities and entrenched themselves deep in these mountains … living a free existence spent chasing deer in the morning and seeking serow in the evening,” even describing them as
As a different column was being written, the big news dropped that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) announced that negotiations within his caucus, with legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT, party Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chair Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) had produced a compromise special military budget proposal. On Thursday morning, prior to meeting with Cheng over a lunch of beef noodles, Lu reiterated her support for a budget of NT$800 or NT$900 billion — but refused to comment after the meeting. Right after Fu’s
Yesterday, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) nominated legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) as their Taipei mayoral candidate, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) put their stamp of approval on Wei Ping-cheng (魏平政) as their candidate for Changhua County commissioner and former legislator Tsai Pi-ru (蔡壁如) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) has begun the process to also run in Changhua, though she has not yet been formally nominated. All three news items are bizarre. The DPP has struggled with settling on a Taipei nominee. The only candidate who declared interest was Enoch Wu (吳怡農), but the party seemed determined to nominate anyone
What government project has expropriated the most land in Taiwan? According to local media reports, it is the Taoyuan Aerotropolis, eating 2,500 hectares of land in its first phase, with more to come. Forty thousand people are expected to be displaced by the project. Naturally that enormous land grab is generating powerful pushback. Last week Chen Chien-ho (陳健和), a local resident of Jhuwei Borough (竹圍) in Taoyuan City’s Dayuan District (大園) filed a petition for constitutional review of the project after losing his case at the Taipei Administrative Court. The Administrative Court found in favor of nine other local landowners, but
RSS