March 5 to March 11
From “Taiwan’s self-rule movement” in 1947 to last year’s “part of the Chinese people’s liberation struggle,” the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long propagated its own interpretation of the 228 Incident.
Even though the CCP was not involved in the anti-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) uprising and subsequent government crackdown that took place across Taiwan on Feb. 28, 1947, it still commemorated the incident during its 70th anniversary last year.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
In fact, ever since the incident broke out, the CCP has used it in their propaganda since it painted their mortal enemy, KMT leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), as a brutal dictator and mass murderer.
“The brutality of Chiang Kai-shek’s rule of Taiwan has exceeded that of Japanese imperialism … It’s clear that Chiang’s intention is to drown Taiwan’s self-rule movement in blood,” the communist-controlled The Liberation Daily (解放日報) printed on March 20, 1947
A COMMON ENEMY
Photo: CNA
As soon as the CCP caught wind of the events in Taiwan, the newspaper printed the news on March 7 with the headline, “The anti-Chiang movement in Taiwan has spread across the entire island, whose people want to establish an autonomous government.”
The next day, the CCP leaders issued a statement voicing their support for “Taiwan’s self-rule movement,” elaborating their position two weeks later in the Liberation Daily.
“Take just a brief look at Taiwan’s history after the war and it will be apparent that this self-rule movement was rational, legal and peaceful. It became an armed revolt because Chiang Kai-shek left them with no choice … Those Chinese feudal fascists have mercilessly plundered from the Taiwanese, leaving them not even a chance of survival … What Taiwanese want is simple, they just want to abolish government monopolies and for Taiwanese to be able to serve in the government of Taiwan.”
Photo: Screenshot
The article listed the civilian death toll on Feb. 28 as “at least 3,000 or 4,000,” comparing Taiwan to the Communist-controlled areas who also had to fight the KMT for “self-rule.”
“Your fight is our fight, your victory is our victory,” it stated. “Both military and civilians of the liberated areas will support you with our own battles.”
The statement concluded with a suggested battle plan to defeat Chiang.
“First of all, do not compromise. The armed revolt has already started, and if you compromise or surrender, Taiwanese compatriots will suffer the most savage bloodbath at the hands of Chiang,” it began.
The first step would be to establish governing and military bodies. Then the new government should satisfy people’s economic needs so as to minimize internal dissent. A strong leader should be elected, and agents sent across Taiwan to work with peasants and formally organize them into military units to fight against the government. The areas out of government reach should be converted into bases to support the war long term.
The CCP leaders were confident that Taiwanese would win the fight, stating that the KMT was already suffering from troop shortages in the Chinese Civil War and would not have many resources to devote to Taiwan.
“If we win a few more battles in China, that will deplete Chiang’s forces even further, and eventually he’ll loosen the pressure on Taiwan. Therefore, the movement in Taiwan will surely end in victory. The Chinese Communist Party praises the bravery of our Taiwanese compatriots, and congratulates you in advance to a glorious victory.”
SHIFTING NARRATIVES
After the rebellion was quelled, the 228 Incident became a taboo subject in Taiwan and was rarely talked about for several decades. The initial KMT narrative of the uprising being incited by Japanese or Communist agents or sympathizers (which was being espoused by the government even into the 1980s) has been shattered even though many details are still under dispute.
In China, the story remains mostly the same. Huang Chin-sheng (黃錦昇) writes in the study, The Interpretation Contexts of the 228 Incident between the Taiwan Strait, that the China-based Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League began commemorating the event in 1949.
“They claim that the patriotic and democratic movement against the KMT dictatorship as part of the Chinese liberation struggle,” Huang writes. “Their most prominent historical narrative is that the CCP supported the Taiwanese in their fight against the KMT.”
This has changed little over the years with An Fengshan (安峰山), spokesman for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, pretty much repeating those exact words last year before the 70th anniversary of the incident.
“The 228 Incident has not been as important to [the CCP’s] continued success; therefore, there has been little if any divergence from their initial interpretation of the event,” writes Craig Smith in the paper, Taiwan’s 228 Incident and the Politics of Placing Blame.
Embellishments were sometimes added. On the 28th anniversary of the incident in 1975, Beijing released a statement linking it to other pro-communist uprisings in China during the 1940s, adding that the Taiwanese were inspired by then-CCP leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東).
The story’s emphasis also shifted with the times. Huang writes that as relations between the KMT and CCP thawed in the mid-2000s, China placed less focus on bashing the KMT, instead praising the Taiwanese for their bravery and stressing that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait shared the same history.
Since the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) retook power in 2015, China has criticized those who frame the incident as a struggle against an outside regime, which would indicate that Taiwan and China were two entities.
“[The DPP has] distorted historical fact, instigated contradictions based on provincial origin, tearing at Taiwan’s ethnic groups and creating antagonism in society,” An said last year. “I think the motives behind this are really despicable.”
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
Mongolian influencer Anudari Daarya looks effortlessly glamorous and carefree in her social media posts — but the classically trained pianist’s road to acceptance as a transgender artist has been anything but easy. She is one of a growing number of Mongolian LGBTQ youth challenging stereotypes and fighting for acceptance through media representation in the socially conservative country. LGBTQ Mongolians often hide their identities from their employers and colleagues for fear of discrimination, with a survey by the non-profit LGBT Centre Mongolia showing that only 20 percent of people felt comfortable coming out at work. Daarya, 25, said she has faced discrimination since she
RSS