JAN. 8 to Jan. 14
When former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) died on Jan. 13, 1988, the reactions were quite different from when his father, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) passed away 13 years earlier.
With the elder Chiang, “the press and ranking officials had employed the contrived language of the imperial court to describe the ‘greatness’ of the departed ruler,” writes Jay Taylor in The Generalissimo’s Son. “But following Ching-kuo’s death ... the traditionally extravagant and quasi-religious titles and praise were absent. Instead, media commentary and individual eulogies focused on Chiang Ching-kuo’s empathy for the common person.”
Photo: Chen Tse-ming, Taipei Times
Also different was who would take over — with Chiang Kai-shek, it was a given that his son would eventually succeed his presidency. But in an 1985 interview with Time magazine, Chiang made it clear that no member of his family would be a candidate for the next president, and that everything would be done under constitutional procedures. Later that year, he reportedly veered off script to make the same statement during a National Assembly meeting.
Vice-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) took over after Chiang’s death, though it took a bit of political maneuvering for Lee to solidify his power. And with that, 39 years of Chiang rule in Taiwan was over.
NOT-SO-IRON GRIP
Photo: Hsu Hui-ling, Taipei Times
Chiang Kai-shek and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ruled Taiwan under martial law with an iron fist for three decades, but by the time Chiang Ching-kuo took over in 1978, he faced a vastly different political landscape.
“The political opposition became more articulate in its demands, while the regime faced a loss of credibility among the politically active population as a result of the growing discrepancy between its self-characterization as a democracy and maintenance of a martial law regime,” writes Hermann Halbeisen in In Search of a Political Order? Political Reform in Taiwan.
A number of significant events took place in the 1970s and 1980s that led to the situation. Internationally, Taiwan was out of the UN while the US cut ties with Taiwan in favor of China. The Jhongli Incident of 1977, where rioters burnt down a police station in response to alleged ballot tampering by the KMT, is said to be the first large-scale civil disturbance in nearly 30 years. There was the Kaohsiung Incident in 1979 that led to a mass arrest of opposition leaders, and in 1984 the government allegedly hired gangsters to assassinate US-based journalist Henry Liu (劉宜良), who published an unflattering biography on Chiang Ching-kuo. With each incident, the KMT’s credibility and image dropped further.
Photo: Chen Hsin-jen, Taipei Times
Calls for reform even came from within. In the study The Transition to the Transition Toward Democracy in Taiwan, Phillip Newell writes, “The KMT would not have chosen reform, however, except that under pressure from intellectuals, the democratic opposition and critics in the US, ‘softliners’ in the KMT gradually convinced the pragmatic leader that the hardliner policy or resisting change indefinitely would undermine the KMT’s ability to win domestic and international supporters. The KMT thus chose to accept political pluralism and competition.”
“If we don’t rejuvenate the KMT, people will give up on the party, even its members will drift away,” Chiang is quoted to have said.
TAIWANESE SUCCESSOR
Chiang Ching-kuo’s “localization” policies began during his tenure as premier. For example, he appointed Taiwan-born Hsu Ching-chung (徐慶鐘) as his deputy and his cabinet included three Taiwan-born ministers without portfolio — including Lee Teng-hui.
Chen Shih-horng (陳世宏) writes in Lee Teng-hui and the Democratization of Taiwan that this was merely a “strategy of pacification.” Most Taiwanese were still barred from real positions of power and the population was still under the restrictions of martial law. But it paved the way for people like Lee, who became Taipei’s mayor in 1978.
Former CIA station chief in Taiwan Ray S. Cline writes in Chiang Ching-kuo Remembered that Chiang held Lee in high regard. Chiang told Cline that Lee not only had great expertise in economics, but he hoped that Lee could cooperate with the China-born leaders and “take great responsibility within the system of multicultural, technologically advanced government developing in the Republic of China.”
Cline first met Lee during his tenure as mayor, leaving with a favorable impression.
“It was apparent to me, although Chiang Ching-kuo never said it specifically in those words, that … he was grooming Lee Teng-hui as a potential successor. I believe that it was his assumption in the later years of his life that another quasi-dynastic succession would be damaging.”
Lee has said that he graduated from the “Chiang Ching-kuo Academy,” which Chen writes did not mean Chiang’s rule as strongman but rather his pragmatism in assessing the situation and willingness to look at alternative solutions. In 1984, Chiang named him vice-president.
“I still respect Chiang Ching-kuo very much,” Lee writes in his memoir, The Remaining Years: My Life Journey and the Road of Taiwan’s Democracy (餘生: 我的生命之旅與台灣民主之路). “He was willing to consider what use he would have for someone born in Taiwan with the personality of a Japanese. That gave me a chance to be the first Taiwan-born president in history. I believe that he had thought it through and realized that the KMT was not going to last long with dictatorship.”
Despite the effort of certain KMT members to block the move, Lee was named acting KMT chairman on Jan. 27, 1988.
“For all practical purposes, by January 1988, democracy, imperfect and rowdy as it was, had made a soft touchdown in Taiwan,” Taylor writes.
Lee, for his part, gives the credit to Chiang, noting that nobody besides Chiang would have dared to terminate martial law.
“Let’s not talk about what Chiang did in the past,” he writes. “He is the one who initiated Taiwan’s democratization process. If it weren’t for his decisions, I would never have been able to launch my plans for democratization. Think about it. Why would the National Assembly and Legislature listen to me?”
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
For many people, Bilingual Nation 2030 begins and ends in the classroom. Since the policy was launched in 2018, the debate has centered on students, teachers and the pressure placed on schools. Yet the policy was never solely about English education. The government’s official plan also calls for bilingualization in Taiwan’s government services, laws and regulations, and living environment. The goal is to make Taiwan more inclusive and accessible to international enterprises and talent and better prepared for global economic and trade conditions. After eight years, that grand vision is due for a pulse check. RULES THAT CAN BE READ For Harper Chen (陳虹宇), an adviser
Traditionally, indigenous people in Taiwan’s mountains practice swidden cultivation, or “slash and burn” agriculture, a practice common in human history. According to a 2016 research article in the International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, among the Atayal people, this began with a search for suitable forested slopeland. The trees are burnt for fertilizer and the land cleared of stones. The stones and wood are then piled up to make fences, while both dead and standing trees are retained on the plot. The fences are used to grow climbing crops like squash and beans. The plot itself supports farming for three years.
The breakwater stretches out to sea from the sprawling Kaohsiung port in southern Taiwan. Normally, it’s crowded with massive tankers ferrying liquefied natural gas from Qatar to be stored in the bulbous white tanks that dot the shoreline. These are not normal times, though, and not a single shipment from Qatar has docked at the Yongan terminal since early March after the Strait of Hormuz was shuttered. The suspension has provided a realistic preview of a potential Chinese blockade, a move that would throttle an economy anchored by the world’s most advanced and power-hungry semiconductor industry. It is a stark reminder of
May 4 to May 10 It was once said that if you hadn’t performed at the Sapphire Grand Cabaret (藍寶石大歌廳), you couldn’t truly be considered a star. Taking the stage at the legendary Kaohsiung club was more than just a concert. Performers were expected to entertain in every sense, wearing outlandish or revealing costumes and staying quick on their feet as sharp-tongued, over-the-top hosts asked questions and delivered jokes that would be seen as vulgar, even offensive, by today’s standards. Opening in May 1967 during a period of strict political and social control, Sapphire offered a rare outlet for audiences in
RSS