Dutch national theater company Toneelgroep Amsterdam (TGA) is returning to Taipei this weekend after a two-year hiatus to close the Taipei International Arts Festival.
The troupe, led by its avant-garde artistic director Ivo van Hove, is to perform its thought-provoking, four-hour-long production adapted by Koen Tachelet from the novel The Fountainhead by controversial American author and philosopher Ayn Rand.
A play containing grand ideas about society and the relationship between the individual and the collective, the story follows Howard Roark, played by poet, actor and former Dutch “poet of the fatherland” Ramsey Nasr, who for this production learned to sketch architectural designs in the style of US architect Frank Lloyd Wright.
Photo courtesy of Jan Versweyveld and TGA
An ambitious and virtuous architect, Roark is willing to bear the ultimate sacrifice for his ideas: To forgo friendship and love, to be rejected by society and, ultimately, to destroy his own creation for the integrity of his architectural ideal.
This lonely process acquires another dimension when the protagonist meets Dominique Francon, powerfully played by lead actress Halina Reijn, who manifests herself as a kindred spirit as well as a formidable opponent in a relationship that is alternately creative and destructive — and which receives much attention in this stage rendering.
Since her breakthrough with The Fountainhead in 1943, Rand and her following have been a force to reckon with, where the author — who preached a philosophy of extreme rational self-interest dubbed Objectivism and reportedly features prominently on the reading shelves of US President Donald Trump and Speaker of the House of Representatives Paul Ryan — is in equal measures admired and reviled.
However, no such politically laden history of controversy exists in the Netherlands, where TGA staged the novel, which is not as widely read in Europe, but has inspired generations of architects and artists.
This has allowed the director to approach the material with fresh eyes, resulting in a play that conveys the full emotional depth of the story, but does not eschew giving Rand’s ideas full stage, whether through archetypal characters that personify the ideas at war in the story or a powerfully rendered double monologue that receives full stage, a flourish that, contrary to the novelist’s original, gives equal voice to both sides of the ethical dilemma facing the architect.
Dutch daily NRC Handelsblad said Van Hove has managed to keep a precariously balanced perspective, “cautiously guiding Rand past the abyss of her own ideology.”
The production is designed by Jan Versweyveld, who has cooperated with Van Hove on a series of high profile plays in recent years. While grand-scale designs do not always benefit a play’s intimacy, Versweyveld’s visually rich multimedia approach and spectacular stage are ideally suited to a story that combines ideas, intrigue and architectural design.
Live music is performed onstage and scenes are projected on a large screen, allowing the audience to follow the process of architectural creation.
The play is performed in Dutch, with English and Chinese surtitles, runs for four hours with an intermission and includes “adult content” — nudity, smoking and blood scenes.
Pre-talks are held 30 minutes before every performance in the theater’s lobby, with a post-show talk after the matinee on Sunday.
Behind a car repair business on a nondescript Thai street are the cherished pets of a rising TikTok animal influencer: two lions and a 200-kilogram lion-tiger hybrid called “Big George.” Lion ownership is legal in Thailand, and Tharnuwarht Plengkemratch is an enthusiastic advocate, posting updates on his feline companions to nearly three million followers. “They’re playful and affectionate, just like dogs or cats,” he said from inside their cage complex at his home in the northern city of Chiang Mai. Thailand’s captive lion population has exploded in recent years, with nearly 500 registered in zoos, breeding farms, petting cafes and homes. Experts warn the
No one saw it coming. Everyone — including the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — expected at least some of the recall campaigns against 24 of its lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) to succeed. Underground gamblers reportedly expected between five and eight lawmakers to lose their jobs. All of this analysis made sense, but contained a fatal flaw. The record of the recall campaigns, the collapse of the KMT-led recalls, and polling data all pointed to enthusiastic high turnout in support of the recall campaigns, and that those against the recalls were unenthusiastic and far less likely to vote. That
A couple of weeks ago the parties aligned with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), voted in the legislature to eliminate the subsidy that enables Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) to keep up with its burgeoning debt, and instead pay for universal cash handouts worth NT$10,000. The subsidy would have been NT$100 billion, while the cash handout had a budget of NT$235 billion. The bill mandates that the cash payments must be completed by Oct. 31 of this year. The changes were part of the overall NT$545 billion budget approved
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
RSS