Earlier this month, former vice premier Chiou I-jen (邱義仁) said the current election was “boring” in the sense that neither side was willing to “innovate.” Joey Neihu won’t hear a word of it.
Boring? Hell, no. This was the month, after all, that the woman formerly known as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate wrote a book about how she made it as far as three months into the campaign before being ousted (she has promised her next work will be a blow-by-blow account of how she once decided to holiday in the Maldives, but later decided the better of it) and we … wait for it … finally got a round of vice-presidential and presidential debates.
KMT vice presidential hopeful Jennifer Wang (王如玄) was finally persuaded to stop playing Monopoly with her hapless husband, who stood down from his position as director of the Judicial Yuan Department of Government Ethics because it was, frankly, getting embarrassing, and People First Party presidential candidate James Soong (宋楚瑜) — did you see him kiss his knees when he took a podium bow? NEVER seen that in a 70-year-old — slipped some truth serum into the other candidates’ glasses as he sauntered past their debate podiums on the way to his own. Now that’s innovation for you.
Photo: Jian Rong-feng, Taipei Times
It took some inspiration from other quarters, however, with all parties at the beginning of the month still trying to reach a consensus on when to hold a coordination meeting in order to reach a consensus on when to hold the debate. No wonder they haven’t been able to reach a consensus on just about anything since, I don’t know, the very beginnings of a two-party system in Taiwan, when the KMT finally acquiesced to the idea of letting somebody other than itself get involved in forming a consensus of any sort. That’s close to 30 years, for those not in the know.
In the end, it fell to 40 student associations nationwide to organize a debate, on Sunday Dec. 6, between Soong, KMT presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) vice presidential candidate Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁). In case you were wondering, DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) had asked for permission to be excused as she was going door-to-door asking if anyone had any spare piggy banks going (the party’s a bit broke). If the last two years have taught us anything, it’s that if you want anything done in politics in Taiwan, leave it to the students.
Finally, the presidential debate a few days ago, with Soong, Chu and Tsai lined up before the media. Someone asks Soong about legislative reform. He answers admirably, pointing out that his hands are tied, not having enough influence over the two major parties.
Photo: Tu Ju-min, Taipei Times
The question then goes to the obsequiously smiley Chu. “The KMT is committed to legislative efficiency and transparency in cross-party negotiations and a neutral legislative speaker,” he says, before taking a sip of water.
“Actually,” he adds, “we did promise legislative reforms, but only two months before the election, after we’ve had control of the legislature for the best part of 65 years, ‘cos we know we don’t have a chance in hell of winning this time round. And haven’t we just reformed the law so that one of our own can extend his term as legislative speaker?”
The next questioner, astounded at Chu’s honesty, aims their question at him, too. “Can you tell us how you are to address stagnant salaries?”
Photo: Wang Min, Taipei Times
“Certainly. I promise, if elected president, to raise the basic salary to NT$30,000 in my first term.”
“Didn’t the last one promise the same thing eight years ago, and fail miserably?”
Chu takes another sip from his glass. “Certainly. And I promise, if elected president, to fail, too. But it hardly matters, because all I’m required to do here is test the public’s credulity to a point just shy of breaking point.”
“Interesting. Tsai. Can I have your views on the salary issue?”
“Yes, of course.” Takes a sip of water. “Hold on… wait a mo… it’s on the tip of my tongue…. No, it’s gone.”
Soong then chimes in with an oratorically punctual, beautifully prepared and stringent clamor of policy ingenuity that all but the most informed or discerning are persuaded to believe, at least arguably, is absolute brilliance, despite the fact of it being crap.
Finally, a question for Chu. “Is the KMT going to return its ill-gotten party assets?
Chu drains his glass. “Not on your nellie, sister.”
Soong wins the debate.
Only some of the above is true.
Eric Finkelstein is a world record junkie. The American’s Guinness World Records include the largest flag mosaic made from table tennis balls, the longest table tennis serve and eating at the most Michelin-starred restaurants in 24 hours in New York. Many would probably share the opinion of Finkelstein’s sister when talking about his records: “You’re a lunatic.” But that’s not stopping him from his next big feat, and this time he is teaming up with his wife, Taiwanese native Jackie Cheng (鄭佳祺): visit and purchase a
April 7 to April 13 After spending over two years with the Republic of China (ROC) Army, A-Mei (阿美) boarded a ship in April 1947 bound for Taiwan. But instead of walking on board with his comrades, his roughly 5-tonne body was lifted using a cargo net. He wasn’t the only elephant; A-Lan (阿蘭) and A-Pei (阿沛) were also on board. The trio had been through hell since they’d been captured by the Japanese Army in Myanmar to transport supplies during World War II. The pachyderms were seized by the ROC New 1st Army’s 30th Division in January 1945, serving
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) last week offered us a glimpse of the violence it plans against Taiwan, with two days of blockade drills conducted around the nation and live-fire exercises not far away in the East China Sea. The PRC said it had practiced hitting “simulated targets of key ports and energy facilities.” Taiwan confirmed on Thursday that PRC Coast Guard ships were directed by the its Eastern Theater Command, meaning that they are assumed to be military assets in a confrontation. Because of this, the number of assets available to the PRC navy is far, far bigger
The 1990s were a turbulent time for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) patronage factions. For a look at how they formed, check out the March 2 “Deep Dives.” In the boom years of the 1980s and 1990s the factions amassed fortunes from corruption, access to the levers of local government and prime access to property. They also moved into industries like construction and the gravel business, devastating river ecosystems while the governments they controlled looked the other way. By this period, the factions had largely carved out geographical feifdoms in the local jurisdictions the national KMT restrained them to. For example,
RSS