Earlier this month, former vice premier Chiou I-jen (邱義仁) said the current election was “boring” in the sense that neither side was willing to “innovate.” Joey Neihu won’t hear a word of it.
Boring? Hell, no. This was the month, after all, that the woman formerly known as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate wrote a book about how she made it as far as three months into the campaign before being ousted (she has promised her next work will be a blow-by-blow account of how she once decided to holiday in the Maldives, but later decided the better of it) and we … wait for it … finally got a round of vice-presidential and presidential debates.
KMT vice presidential hopeful Jennifer Wang (王如玄) was finally persuaded to stop playing Monopoly with her hapless husband, who stood down from his position as director of the Judicial Yuan Department of Government Ethics because it was, frankly, getting embarrassing, and People First Party presidential candidate James Soong (宋楚瑜) — did you see him kiss his knees when he took a podium bow? NEVER seen that in a 70-year-old — slipped some truth serum into the other candidates’ glasses as he sauntered past their debate podiums on the way to his own. Now that’s innovation for you.
Photo: Jian Rong-feng, Taipei Times
It took some inspiration from other quarters, however, with all parties at the beginning of the month still trying to reach a consensus on when to hold a coordination meeting in order to reach a consensus on when to hold the debate. No wonder they haven’t been able to reach a consensus on just about anything since, I don’t know, the very beginnings of a two-party system in Taiwan, when the KMT finally acquiesced to the idea of letting somebody other than itself get involved in forming a consensus of any sort. That’s close to 30 years, for those not in the know.
In the end, it fell to 40 student associations nationwide to organize a debate, on Sunday Dec. 6, between Soong, KMT presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) vice presidential candidate Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁). In case you were wondering, DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) had asked for permission to be excused as she was going door-to-door asking if anyone had any spare piggy banks going (the party’s a bit broke). If the last two years have taught us anything, it’s that if you want anything done in politics in Taiwan, leave it to the students.
Finally, the presidential debate a few days ago, with Soong, Chu and Tsai lined up before the media. Someone asks Soong about legislative reform. He answers admirably, pointing out that his hands are tied, not having enough influence over the two major parties.
Photo: Tu Ju-min, Taipei Times
The question then goes to the obsequiously smiley Chu. “The KMT is committed to legislative efficiency and transparency in cross-party negotiations and a neutral legislative speaker,” he says, before taking a sip of water.
“Actually,” he adds, “we did promise legislative reforms, but only two months before the election, after we’ve had control of the legislature for the best part of 65 years, ‘cos we know we don’t have a chance in hell of winning this time round. And haven’t we just reformed the law so that one of our own can extend his term as legislative speaker?”
The next questioner, astounded at Chu’s honesty, aims their question at him, too. “Can you tell us how you are to address stagnant salaries?”
Photo: Wang Min, Taipei Times
“Certainly. I promise, if elected president, to raise the basic salary to NT$30,000 in my first term.”
“Didn’t the last one promise the same thing eight years ago, and fail miserably?”
Chu takes another sip from his glass. “Certainly. And I promise, if elected president, to fail, too. But it hardly matters, because all I’m required to do here is test the public’s credulity to a point just shy of breaking point.”
“Interesting. Tsai. Can I have your views on the salary issue?”
“Yes, of course.” Takes a sip of water. “Hold on… wait a mo… it’s on the tip of my tongue…. No, it’s gone.”
Soong then chimes in with an oratorically punctual, beautifully prepared and stringent clamor of policy ingenuity that all but the most informed or discerning are persuaded to believe, at least arguably, is absolute brilliance, despite the fact of it being crap.
Finally, a question for Chu. “Is the KMT going to return its ill-gotten party assets?
Chu drains his glass. “Not on your nellie, sister.”
Soong wins the debate.
Only some of the above is true.
Sept.16 to Sept. 22 The “anti-communist train” with then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) face plastered on the engine puffed along the “sugar railway” (糖業鐵路) in May 1955, drawing enthusiastic crowds at 103 stops covering nearly 1,200km. An estimated 1.58 million spectators were treated to propaganda films, plays and received free sugar products. By this time, the state-run Taiwan Sugar Corporation (台糖, Taisugar) had managed to connect the previously separate east-west lines established by Japanese-era sugar factories, allowing the anti-communist train to travel easily from Taichung to Pingtung’s Donggang Township (東港). Last Sunday’s feature (Taiwan in Time: The sugar express) covered the inauguration of the
This Qing Dynasty trail takes hikers from renowned hot springs in the East Rift Valley, up to the top of the Coastal Mountain Range, and down to the Pacific Short vacations to eastern Taiwan often require choosing between the Rift Valley with its pineapple fields, rice paddies and broader range of amenities, or the less populated coastal route for its ocean scenery. For those who can’t decide, why not try both? The Antong Traversing Trail (安通越嶺道) provides just such an opportunity. Built 149 years ago, the trail linked up these two formerly isolated parts of the island by crossing over the Coastal Mountain Range. After decades of serving as a convenient path for local Amis, Han settlers, missionaries and smugglers, the trail fell into disuse once modern roadways were built
“Once you get there, you think, that’s a little embarrassing or revealing or scary... but ultimately, I learned that is where the good stuff is,” says Taiwanese-American director Sean Wang about writing indie breakout Didi (弟弟), which debuted at Sundance Film Festival Asia 2024 in Taipei last month. Didi is a heartwarming coming-of-age story centered on the Asian American experience. Not just a 2000s teenage nostalgia piece, but a raw, unflinching look at immigrant families and adolescent identity struggles. It quickly became the centerpiece of the event, striking a chord with not only those sharing similar backgrounds but anyone who’s ever
“Magical,” “special,” a “total badass:” step forward Kamala Harris, the 59-year-old dynamo who has rebranded her country at lightning speed, offering it up as a nation synonymous with optimism, hope and patriotism. For the rest of us, Kamala’s gift is her joy and vibrancy — and the way she is smashing it just months away from her seventh decade, holding up 60 in all its power and glory. Welcome to the new golden age. Hers is the vibrancy of a woman who owns her power, a woman who is manifesting her experience and expertise, a woman who knows her time has
RSS