Unshackled from decades of censorship by military rulers that choked creativity along with dissent, a new generation of Myanmar filmmakers are turning their cameras on to subjects once deemed taboo.
Once home to one of the most prolific movie industries in Southeast Asia, Myanmar’s film studios atrophied under nearly half a century of junta control.
But in the four years since outright army rule ended, a crop of emerging documentary-makers are telling long-neglected tales of daily life — from homosexual relationships to the marginalization of refugees.
Photo: AFP / Ye Aung Thu
Freedom of expression, although still imperfect inside a country where authorities retain a repressive reflex, is one of the clearest gains of the reforms so far. Young filmmakers are hopeful the Nov. 8 elections will be a watershed moment, with Aung San Suu Kyi’s pro-democracy opposition tipped to make major gains, raising hopes for greater opportunities to debate the nation’s issues through the arts.
“We have to reveal the true situation of our country. There are many hidden problems and sorrows which people keep to themselves,” said 36-year-old film student Nwaye Zar Che Soe at the nation’s only film school in Yangon.
Her documentary tackles land grabbing, an incendiary issue in Myanmar where the state and its powerful business allies are accused of displacing tens of thousands of people without due process.
Yet boundaries remain and two topics in particular remain too sensitive for the silver screen: the military and religion.
In a country where the army still holds sway over the quasi-civilian government and radical Buddhism is on the rise, free speech has once again been cramped in recent months.
In October an activist was arrested over a satirical Facebook post about the military, while a bar manager from New Zealand languishes in jail over a cheap drinks promotion that used an image of the Buddha wearing headphones.
‘CREATIVE INTELLIGENTSIA’
Repressive military rule and censorship ended Myanmar’s post-independence ‘golden age’ of cinema, which ran from the 1950s through to the mid-1970s.
Now filmmakers are again questioning subjects that would have been unthinkable before 2012, when the government abolished a pre-publication censorship regime that straddled newspapers, song lyrics and even fairy tales.
Breakout magazines and journals are now filling newsstands, art galleries are flourishing and new voices are also entering Myanmar’s film landscape.
Technology is guiding the pace of change.
In a Yangon apartment, preparations were in full swing recently for Myanmar’s first-ever mobile phone film festival due to be held later this year in a nation where cellphones were a luxury until recently.
“Many people now have a mobile phone and it is a powerful weapon to tell stories,” said organizer Zaw Zaw Myo Lwin who also runs a film production company, as he sifted through entries on his computer.
Film is also stirring critical thinking in a nation schooled on rote-learning and army PR.
“We grew up on military government propaganda films... through documentary films we can let people think and discuss,” said Thu Thu Shein, who launched Myanmar’s original film festival four years ago.
A breakthrough moment for documentary came in 2012 when a film about the former regime’s refusal to accept humanitarian aid during the devastating 2008 Cyclone Nargis was finally screened without reprisal.
The film had a troubled history with two of the Yangon Film School students behind it arrested and another pair forced into exile, before censorship was eased.
With foreign journalists rushing in to tell Myanmar’s transition story, the school’s Anglo-Burmese founder is concerned homegrown filmmakers may struggle to gain a foothold.
“I also think it’s important to foster a creative intelligentsia that can play a crucial role in the country’s development,” said Lindsey Merrison.
Yet the question of who these films actually reach is playing high on the minds of some of Myanmar’s most talented new documentary makers.
In the small apartment where he lives and runs a production company with three friends, Lamin Oo is editing a movie for an upcoming LGBT film festival.
The award-winning filmmaker, who was name-checked by Barack Obama during the US President’s 2014 visit to Myanmar, brims with ideas of “untold stories” from his country.
But he seeks a wider audience for documentaries which are largely restricted to the more affluent festival circuit.
“It’s a good time to show the world what we are, who we are and (what) we have been through,” he said, but “we need better platforms.”
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The election of Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as chair of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) marked a triumphant return of pride in the “Chinese” in the party name. Cheng wants Taiwanese to be proud to call themselves Chinese again. The unambiguous winner was a return to the KMT ideology that formed in the early 2000s under then chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) put into practice as far as he could, until ultimately thwarted by hundreds of thousands of protestors thronging the streets in what became known as the Sunflower movement in 2014. Cheng is an unambiguous Chinese ethnonationalist,
RSS