Having a romance, joining a school club and getting a part-time job are said to be three required courses for all Taiwanese university students. Since the academic year has just begun, it is time again for students to choose a club to join. For lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) students, however, universities continue to use technicalities to block the establishment of LGBT student clubs.
As the Gender Equity Education Act (性別平等教育法) states: “Schools shall provide a gender-fair learning environment, respect and give due consideration to students, faculty, and staff with different gender, gender temperaments, gender identity, and sexual orientation.”
The fact that the government and schools fail to ensure a fair learning environment for all has clearly highlighted the necessity of such clubs.
Photo: Su Ching-feng, Taipei Times
BUILDING FRIENDLY CAMPUSES
The nation’s first gay student club, NTU GayChat (台大男同性戀社), was established by National Taiwan University (NTU) students in 1993. Although the school approved their application, it forced them to name it “gay issues study club” (男同性戀問題研究社) at first, so as to spin it as an academic group to reduce controversy.
Two years later, students established NTU Lambda (台大浪達社), the nation’s first lesbian student club. To avoid drawing too much attention at school, the club was named after the Greek letter “λ” (lambda) — an international symbol for LGBT rights. By doing so, faculty and students would not know instantly that it is a lesbian group.
Photo: Lai Hsiao-tung, Taipei Times
“The club is meant to build a friendly environment for gay students, whether members or not,” said GayChat secretary Little Jie (小杰), a pseudonym, during a television interview, adding that straight students are welcome too.
The club provides lectures on various LGBT issues every Friday and some leisure activities at the beginning and end of each semester. It also holds birthday parties for members regularly to create a friendly atmosphere.
In June 1995, GayChat and Lambda jointly launched the first Gay and Lesbian Awakening Day (GLAD, 校園同志甦醒日) campaign to raise awareness on campuses across Taiwan. In recent years, many LGBT student clubs at different universities have taken turns organizing the annual GLAD party in May or June, along with LGBT forums, film festivals and other activities, while forming a student non-governmental organization.
Meanwhile, the Internet has allowed more LGBT students to create online gay and lesbian boards on the Bulletin Board Systems (BBS) of their universities, which could then be transformed into LGBT student clubs.
Over the past 20 years, club members have worked hard to protect equal rights, eliminate discrimination, oppression and bullying, push for gay-friendly legislation, promote safe sex and develop educational materials through their groups. Also, they have actively participated in and contributed to the LGBT rights movement in Taiwan outside the campus.
Today, many universities and some senior high schools have their own LGBT student clubs, both official and unofficial. However, operating these clubs is not easy, even at more liberal schools like NTU.
Chen Ling (陳凌), a former Lambda president, says that many gay and lesbian students fear coming out due to family, school and social pressure.
“A member once asked me to keep my voice down during our conversation at school, worrying that teachers and schoolmates would find out that she is lesbian,” Chen says.
And some school officials are against LGBT students and clubs. When National Chengchi Universty (NCCU) students established the NCCU Lu Ren Jia LGBTQQIA Club (政大陸仁賈) in 1997, they would occasionally hold on-campus activities using the name of another club to avoid school interference. Although the situation has gradually improved, members complain that some school employees refuse to help them promote club affairs.
The unfavorable situation facing LGBT students can be worse at universities funded by religious groups. In 2013, almost 100 LGBT students staged a protest at Fu Jen Catholic University (FJU) after Taiwan’s 17 Catholic and Christian universities issued an open letter opposing same-sex marriage. They also accused the school of denying their application for establishing gay and lesbian student clubs, which have operated underground for years.
Last year, FJU’s “unofficial” lesbian student club planned to hold a speech. But school officials quickly tore down the posters before the event because they were worried that the speaker would “teach the audience how to become homosexual.”
At a time when student clubs recruit new blood, university officials are violating the Gender Equity Education Act if they continue to harass or ban LGBT student clubs. The Ministry of Education could improve the situation by including this in their school evaluations.
A more effective way would be for members of LGBT student clubs to actively join gender equality committees and students’ associations so as to make their voices heard, while pushing for reform within the school system. Hopefully that would speed up the creation of a fair learning environment for all.
The outbreak of COVID-19 among the tech firms in Miaoli County — a complete failure by the brokers, firms and the local and central government, any one of whom could have taken action to prevent it — has triggered a serious outbreak of another endemic disease: racism towards migrant workers. The firms themselves led the way, sending around circulars that warned the workers that they would have to pay for their own COVID-19 care should they become infected. One circular I saw even said that workers who contract the virus will be liable for any harm they cause the firm.
Vaccines are the latest flashpoint inflaming cross-strait tensions between China and Taiwan, as the latter tries to fend off its worst coronavirus outbreak since the pandemic began with a mostly unvaccinated population and the former rails against outside assistance from Taipei’s allies. Global vaccination drives are widely seen as the only way out of the COVID-19 pandemic, but in Taiwan, just 3 percent of the population has received at least one dose. Now it is battling hundreds of cases a day and does not have enough vaccines for its 23.5 million people. Affected by global shortages, low initial orders and accusations of
June 14 to June 20 During the early 1990s, tens of thousands of Taipei residents subscribed to an illegal cable service named “Shinganxian” (新幹線). With over 140 employees, it was the largest among more than 40 similar operations in the capital. For a relatively cheap price, people could sign up for up to 37 channels ranging from Buddhist seminars to WWE wrestling to X-rated movies. Otherwise they were limited to the government-approved “old three channels” (老三台): Taiwan Television, (TTV), China Television (CTV) and Chinese Television System (CTS), which were established between 1962 and 1971. According to a 1991 Commonwealth Magazine (天下雜誌) article, an
With no way to make money during the outbreak and a developmentally delayed third-grader to raise alone, the only thing Mr Lin (林) can do is pray for vaccines. “I just hope that people can get vaccinated and life can go back to usual soon,” Lin says during a Line interview. “It’s unfortunate that Taiwan’s awkward international status prevents us from getting vaccines.” A foot masseuse catering to tourists in Taipei, Lin’s income already took a hit when the COVID-19 pandemic hit last year. With the latest outbreak shuttering massage parlors across the nation, he is now out of a