Taiwan in Time: Aug. 24 to Aug. 30
While Cheng Cheng-kung’s (鄭成功) claim to fame is driving the Dutch out of Taiwan and is worshiped in several local temples, his legacy is a complicated one to define.
Born on Aug. 27, 1624 in Japan to a Chinese father and Japanese mother, Cheng joined his father in China when he was seven.
Photo: Meng Ching-tzu, Taipei Times
The Ming Dynasty fell in 1644, and Cheng’s father and his pirate fleet were tasked with defending Fuzhou (福州), the fallen empire’s last stronghold. It was during this time that Emperor Longwu (隆武) gave him the name Cheng-kung, meaning success, and granted him use of the royal last name Chu (朱) and the title of Guoxingye (國姓爺), literally Lord of the Imperial Surname, spelled in the West as Koxinga.
Cheng’s father defected to the Qing Dynasty in 1646, but Cheng remained loyal to the Ming and resisted the invaders until 1661, when he was forced out of China and headed to Taiwan, which was then under Dutch control with a predominantly Aboriginal population.
Intending to use Taiwan as a base to retake China, Cheng landed near Tainan, conquered Fort Provintia (in today’s Tainan) and ended 38 years of Dutch rule by capturing Fort Zeelandia (today’s Tainan) after a nine-month siege.
Cheng renamed Taiwan Tungtu (東土) and established a Ming-style government. To feed his 30,000 followers, his administration started large-scale land developments for farming carried out by his troops. Cheng died less than two years later at age 39, but his family continued to rule Taiwan for the next 20 years.
Legacy claimed by many
Cheng’s legacy is a complex one, having been long-used as propaganda by Japan, China and Taiwan. For each viewpoint, there seems to be a contradictory proposal.
The Qing Dynasty initially saw Cheng as an anti-government rebel, listed by Qianlong Emperor as a “rebellious subject” (逆臣). Near the end of the dynasty, Cheng was not only revived as a symbol of resistance against the West, but also revered by revolutionaries as an anti-Manchu hero to fuel their cause. This was the beginning of his status as a “national hero” (民族英雄).
Up until recent decades, he was consistently seen in both Taiwan and China as a hero who “recovered” Taiwan from “foreign” rule. Yet, recovered for whom? Taiwan was not part of China until the Qing government annexed it by defeating Cheng’s grandson in 1683.
If recovering Taiwan isn’t accurate, some also see Cheng as the “father of Taiwan’s development” (開台始祖), which doesn’t do justice to the Aboriginals, some of whom have protested his legacy in recent years.
Due to his heritage, Japan also sees Cheng as a native son and used his Japanese heritage as propaganda during its occupation of Taiwan. At the same time in China, his name was invoked as inspiration to expel the Japanese.
After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) retreated to Taiwan, its leader Chiang-Kai Shek (蔣介石) used the similarity of their goals of using Taiwan as a base to reclaim China to maintain public support for his agenda. Conversely, the People’s Republic of China’s government saw him as a hero who liberated Taiwan for the motherland.
Another view gaining popularity nowadays is that Cheng is seen as the founder of the first Han Chinese government in Taiwan, leading the first large-scale Chinese migration and serving as a catalyst for increasing Chinese influence and presence in the country.
These are only the major talking points, and there are many other nuances regarding Taiwan’s identity that talking about Cheng may bring up. While he isn’t the only historical figure whose legacy will differ depending on whom you speak to, it is clear that he changed the fate of Taiwan when he took on the Dutch.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
Food prices have often played a major role in Taiwan’s history. The first major wave of migration from China occurred in 1628. A moderate drought, the Ming Dynasty maritime ban that prohibited fishing and trading (intended to reduce piracy) and a temporary tax, conspired to exhaust local resources, leading to famine in Fujian Province. The famed pirate and trader Zheng Zhilong (鄭芝龍), scooped up starving people from Fujian and transported them across the Taiwan Strait, where they settled under the Dutch. Two factors enabled Zheng. First, by 1624 he had settlements around today’s Beigang (北港) in Yunlin County with a small