It would seem that Mr Popper’s Penguins, a summer family stopgap between the Kung Fu Panda and Cars sequels, missed the movie-penguin craze by about five years, though perhaps it will prompt a penguin revival. In any case, the film, directed with bounce and snap by Mark Waters, stands as a comeback of sorts for Jim Carrey, who mugs and prances and does funny voices and manages not to be upstaged by a half-dozen flightless birds. The birds — real gentoo penguins with computer-enhanced abilities — honk, defecate and waddle around Manhattan while Carrey’s Popper, at first vexed and then beguiled by the creatures, tries to deal with them, his job, his children and the state of his soul.
Old-timers — those with vivid memories of Carrey’s Ace Ventura movies — will notice, with a sigh, that his rubbery limbs have lost a bit of stretch and his highly mobile face has acquired some lines. Mr Popper’s Penguins, based on the venerable and charming children’s book by Richard and Florence Atwater, signifies an important stage in Carrey’s maturation, or at least his transition from nitwit man-child to goofy dad. Just about every male screen comedian must negotiate this passage at some point: Eddie Murphy managed pretty well for a while with the Dr Dolittle movies. Adam Sandler struggled with Grown Ups, though that film’s box office returns suggested that the moviegoing masses did not mind.
And there is not a lot to object to in Mr Popper’s Penguins, a mildly amusing specimen of a genre that has produced some of the most unspeakable atrocities of recent cinema. (Do you think I’m exaggerating? Did you see Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel?) The hectic plot is fairly standard, with a soft therapeutic coating wrapped around situations that might be unbearably painful or embarrassing in real life.
Photo courtesy of Fox Movies
Neglected by his globe-trotting father, Popper grows into a sharkish real-estate wheeler-dealer, flipping New York landmarks and falling out of touch with his young son (Maxwell Perry Cotton) and adolescent daughter (Madeline Carroll). He must, in addition to wrangling the birds — a bequest from Dad, multiplied by a customer service error — try to win back his ex-wife (Carla Gugino) and woo a reluctant seller (Angela Lansbury) to part with the Tavern on the Green.
The arrival of the penguins precipitates Popper’s transformation from uptight money man into, well, Jim Carrey. Carrey is the kind of performer whose shtick reliably trumps psychological sense, and the film’s blithe incoherence with respect to its main character is one of its virtues. It turns sentimental now and then, but it knows — Carrey knows — that what the audience wants from him is silliness. Among Popper’s possessions is a boxed set of Charlie Chaplin DVDs, and while it may be presumptuous of Carrey to clown in such company, he is also paying tribute to a great precursor. The penguins, in any case, love the Little Tramp, recognizing a kindred spirit or at least a similar way of walking.
The valuable lessons go by without too much heartstring tugging, and you can enjoy watching the title characters, human and avian, cavorting in Popper’s snow-filled Manhattan duplex. A neighbor (David Krumholtz) objects, and a further complication arise in the form of an officious zoo guy (Clark Gregg), who denies that penguins could love Mr Popper. But why shouldn’t they? And why shouldn’t we chuckle at the alliterative shenanigans of his assistant, Pippi (Ophelia Lovibond), who packs a peck of plosives into every utterance.
As I said, there is nothing new here, but Waters, as he showed with the smarter and more daring Mean Girls and Freaky Friday, knows how to keep things buzzing along. Whether or not this movie sets off a new penguin craze, it will probably sell some penguin merchandise and provide about 90 minutes of tolerable jollity.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ!). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
At Computex 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) urged the government to subsidize AI. “All schools in Taiwan must integrate AI into their curricula,” he declared. A few months earlier, he said, “If I were a student today, I’d immediately start using tools like ChatGPT, Gemini Pro and Grok to learn, write and accelerate my thinking.” Huang sees the AI-bullet train leaving the station. And as one of its drivers, he’s worried about youth not getting on board — bad for their careers, and bad for his workforce. As a semiconductor supply-chain powerhouse and AI hub wannabe, Taiwan is seeing