Interest in history is on the rise in books, films and television. Is that necessarily a good thing?
The Balkans, Winston Churchill wrote, had more history than they could consume. Too much history can even become “the gravedigger of the present,” sapping our vital energies with memories of past wounds and losses, as Friedrich Nietzsche said in On the Use and Abuse of History for Life.
Margaret MacMillan borrows Nietzsche’s title, but not his message in her new book, The Uses and Abuses of History. For her, understanding the past is vital, even if history is an explosive substance that needs to be handled with care.
A prize-winning historian and the warden of St Antony’s College at the University of Oxford, MacMillan is good on the perpetuation of historical myth. A case in point is the oft-repeated contention, boosted by economist John Maynard Keynes, that the victors’ vindictive treatment of Germany after World War I inevitably led to World War II.
Yet the Germans did, after all, lose the war, and their punishment in practice was never as harsh as critics persist in suggesting, MacMillan reminds us: Germany paid only a fraction of the reparations bill; Adolf Hitler canceled what was left; and in any case it was the Great Depression that really put the screws on the country, sharpening its aggressive mood.
Facing up to uncomfortable historical truths can be painful, as MacMillan notes. Britain’s mismanagement of the Irish question and Rhodesia are good examples, as is Germany’s embrace of the Nazis.
Yet it’s immature to see our past as little more than an accumulation of guilt, she argues. Everything comes down to a balanced view of history, something Russia’s leaders are now upsetting as they seek, little by little, to refurbish Josef Stalin’s reputation, she says.
A similar perversion of history can be seen in Japan, where many a textbook continues to shy away from presenting a true account of the atrocities Japanese troops committed in China in the 1930s and during World War II.
Nationalism is one of history’s greatest enemies, MacMillan argues. The Chinese, she says, would be surprised to learn that Hindu extremists claim to have rediscovered an advanced Indian civilization that preceded China’s. By this account, the Chinese are little more than descendants of Hindu warriors. Equally surprised by this theory would be the followers of Marcus Garvey, who claimed in the 1920s that a black civilization once ruled the world.
The danger of knowing too much history is of course outweighed by the risk of knowing too little. Americans, according to MacMillan, failed to understand the historically formed mentality of their Cold War opponents, Russia and China (not that it stopped them winning, except in Vietnam). Ignorance of Iraq’s culture was a major factor in some of the catastrophic consequences of the US-led invasion of that country, and MacMillan devotes many pages to a familiar critique of former US president George W. Bush and all his works.
Given this emphasis on the past’s lessons for the present, it’s surprising that MacMillan doesn’t discuss the history behind the rise of terrorism. She rightly accuses some countries of developing grievance cultures, and she chides the Chinese, the Latin Americans and the French Canadians (MacMillan is Canadian) for blaming colonialism for all their woes.
“It is all too easy to rummage through the past and find nothing but a list of grievances,” she writes.
Strangely, MacMillan spares Muslim cultures from this criticism and even comes close to justifying their long- festering resentments.
“The Crusades, the defeat of the Moors in Spain, Western imperialism in the 19th century and the evils of the 20th all add up to a dark tale of Muslim humiliation and suffering,” she writes. “Such history keeps followers angry and motivates and attracts new recruits.”
No suggestion here that these cultures carry any responsibility for their own destinies. But what of their oppression of women and attacks on modernity?
Almost every major country and civilization gets whacked in these pages for its misdemeanors. Yet Iran, an ancient, grievance-ridden culture par excellence now led by a semi-crazed president, escapes censure. As for Pakistan — a clear and present danger to the world if ever there was one — it isn’t even mentioned. Surely its tragic history was worth a word.
No one will dissent from MacMillan’s view that history must be prudently handled, but prudence must not mean inconsistency or evasion.
The book is published in the US under the title ‘Dangerous Games.’
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
Toward the outside edge of Taichung City, in Wufeng District (霧峰去), sits a sprawling collection of single-story buildings with tiled roofs belonging to the Wufeng Lin (霧峰林家) family, who rose to prominence through success in military, commercial, and artistic endeavors in the 19th century. Most of these buildings have brick walls and tiled roofs in the traditional reddish-brown color, but in the middle is one incongruous property with bright white walls and a black tiled roof: Yipu Garden (頤圃). Purists may scoff at the Japanese-style exterior and its radical departure from the Fujianese architectural style of the surrounding buildings. However, the property
RSS