Firing shots into the air, a group of Chechen rebels storm a theater in Moscow and take roughly 700 theatergoers hostage. Terrorists blow up commuter trains in Madrid. Two planes plow into the World Trade Center's twin towers in New York, killing nearly 3,000 people.
Terrorism, whether directly experienced by the few or seen on television by the many, is a fact of contemporary life. It is also the central theme of La Fura dels Baus docu-drama Boris Godunov, which begins next Friday at Taipei's National Theater.
"The show is a reflection on global terrorism, [with] archetypal characters," said director Alex Olle in a recent interview with the Spanish-language newspaper Barceloca.
PHOTO COURTESY OF TAIPEI ARTS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Boris Godunov fuses a true-life event, the attack on the Moscow's Dubrovka Theater in October of 2002, with Alexander Pushkin's play, which takes its title from the Czar of the same name, who gradually sinks into madness after murdering the Czarevich Dimitri to usurp the throne.
By blending the historical with the contemporary, the real with the fictive, La Fura creates a tragic parable about the quandary between means and ends and how corruption often breeds violence.
"Many times violence is used to gain power, not only through terrorism but also through states," Olle said.
PHOTO COURTESY OF TAIPEI ARTS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
But the play doesn't so much analyze the causes of terrorism as it shows how terrorism radically alters the people who perpetrate it, and the consequent effect on how we perceive the world.
The troupe's objective with Boris Godunov is to immerse the audience in an extreme experience and, in the process, return theater to its cathartic roots.
The play opens with Godunov brooding over the prince's murder. Preoccupied with bad omens, the Czar fails to notice the balaclava-clad figures sneaking through the room and filling it with explosives. Gradually, the terrorists begin to move out into the audience, shifting the action from the Czar's lodgings to the Dubrovka Theater.
From this point on the audience experiences a simulation of the horrors suffered by the hostages in the Moscow theater: the appearance of the militants, the planting of bombs, the tension of the kidnapping and the arguments among the terrorists.
"[W]e give the terrorists some motives … from the most mercenary terrorist - who could be on either side, to the widowed terrorist - acting more out of vengeance, or hate, or the person who [is doing it] for some ideals," Olle said.
Though the spotlight shines squarely on the individual motives and internal disputes of the terrorists, La Fura's Boris Godunov suggests that the rationale for acts of terrorism have their roots in the foreign and domestic agendas of nation-states. As such, terrorism and its opponents are simply two different sides of the same tarnished coin.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS