On a train bound from Warsaw to Belgrade, Colonel Jean-Francois Mercier, the immensely attractive hero of Alan Furst’s sinuous new novel, cannot decide what to read. Should it be Stendhal’s Red and the Black, which a teacher once told him was “a political novel, very nearly a spy novel, one of the first ever written”? Or should it be The Bar on the Seine, an early Georges Simenon detective story featuring Commissaire Jules Maigret?
One is a much-admired classic, the other a more forthright page-turner. Mercier winds up devouring both. And no wonder: Furst’s instant espionage classics are equally indebted to both kinds of fiction. His stories combine keen deductive precision with much deeper, more turbulent and impassioned aspects of character. Since they are also soigne and steamy, there is the inevitable woman in the dining car, with whom Mercier will have this perfectly succinct conversation:
“‘So,’ she said, ‘an adventure on a train.’
“‘No,’ he said. ‘More.’”
And, two pages and one change of venue later, in Mercier’s sleeping car: “They paused, shared a look of exquisite complicity, and she raised her hips.” This is one of those Furst one-sentence erotic marvels that truly could stop a train in its tracks.
If Furst wrote arid, mechanical spy books, such steam heat might be surprising. But he can invest even the most humdrum situation with similarly elegant acuity. In this latest brooding, sophisticated period piece, The Spies of Warsaw, winter does not simply arrive. Instead, “out in the countryside, the first paw prints of wolves were seen near the villages.” It is late 1937 in Poland, and the atmosphere is charged with peril. The wolves are both metaphorical and real.
Mercier is a French aristocrat, a contemporary of Charles de Gaulle who, after lengthy military service, has become the military attache to Poland. France and Poland are allies, and Furst observes with characteristic worldliness, that “allies were, for reasons of the heart more than the brain, supposed to trust each other.”
But as Mercier acknowledges to his Polish counterpart, Colonel Anton Vyborg (“tall and well-built and thin-lipped, with webbed lines at the corners of eyes made to squint into blizzards”), the reality is different. With a second World War looming before military men old enough to have fought in the first one, Mercier says: “You know what I think, Anton. If the worst happens, and it starts again, you must be prepared to stand alone.”
As Furst has acknowledged, the outcomes of his pre-World War II novels are never in doubt. And much of the plot of The Spies of Warsaw hinges on a question answerable in hindsight: Yes, Germany will invade France. But this book is set at a point when a knowledge of Germany’s precise plans is all-important. And so, as the book begins, Mercier meets not only with fellow dignitaries but also with a character whom he holds in slight contempt.
Mercier is cultivating Edvard Uhl, a German who can provide the particulars about how German tanks are constructed. Uhl does this gladly because his monthly trips to Warsaw allow him to conduct an affair with a woman he thinks is royalty. But the woman is deceiving him. “I rather like her, actually,” the female spy says of the countess she impersonates when Uhl comes to town.
When Uhl arouses German suspicions, Mercier starts trying to protect him. And when questions of tank traps and fortifications arise, Mercier abandons any complaints about being bored by his work. As Furst plays his usual cat-and-mouse games, he lures both Mercier and the reader into high-stakes espionage activities in which prescience about a possible tank attack is all-important. To the extent that The Spies of Warsaw has a central thread, this is it.
Furst has created this book on a broad canvas. And he succeeds in doing so without losing sight of his narrative focus. Mercier deals with an arch, international mixture of characters, all of whom share a kind of anxiety that is anything but dated. “A bad dream,” Vyborg says about tank information found in Wehrmacht journals. “They write books and articles about what they intend to do, but nobody seems to notice, or care.”
As always, but with especially great efficacy in The Spies of Warsaw, Furst asks how life can go on in the face of encroaching menace. And in the book’s uncommonly fine-tuned portrait of Mercier, it has some kind of answer.
Three big changes have transformed the landscape of Taiwan’s local patronage factions: Increasing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) involvement, rising new factions and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) significantly weakened control. GREEN FACTIONS It is said that “south of the Zhuoshui River (濁水溪), there is no blue-green divide,” meaning that from Yunlin County south there is no difference between KMT and DPP politicians. This is not always true, but there is more than a grain of truth to it. Traditionally, DPP factions are viewed as national entities, with their primary function to secure plum positions in the party and government. This is not unusual
More than 75 years after the publication of Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Orwellian phrase “Big Brother is watching you” has become so familiar to most of the Taiwanese public that even those who haven’t read the novel recognize it. That phrase has now been given a new look by amateur translator Tsiu Ing-sing (周盈成), who recently completed the first full Taiwanese translation of George Orwell’s dystopian classic. Tsiu — who completed the nearly 160,000-word project in his spare time over four years — said his goal was to “prove it possible” that foreign literature could be rendered in Taiwanese. The translation is part of
Mongolian influencer Anudari Daarya looks effortlessly glamorous and carefree in her social media posts — but the classically trained pianist’s road to acceptance as a transgender artist has been anything but easy. She is one of a growing number of Mongolian LGBTQ youth challenging stereotypes and fighting for acceptance through media representation in the socially conservative country. LGBTQ Mongolians often hide their identities from their employers and colleagues for fear of discrimination, with a survey by the non-profit LGBT Centre Mongolia showing that only 20 percent of people felt comfortable coming out at work. Daarya, 25, said she has faced discrimination since she
The other day, a friend decided to playfully name our individual roles within the group: planner, emotional support, and so on. I was the fault-finder — or, as she put it, “the grumpy teenager” — who points out problems, but doesn’t suggest alternatives. She was only kidding around, but she struck at an insecurity I have: that I’m unacceptably, intolerably negative. My first instinct is to stress-test ideas for potential flaws. This critical tendency serves me well professionally, and feels true to who I am. If I don’t enjoy a film, for example, I don’t swallow my opinion. But I sometimes worry
RSS