If the thrill of gambling were really about winning, there would be too few gamblers to support the multibillion-US dollar Vegas gambling industry. Everybody knows that the odds are predetermined to favor the house, and that people play the games for the rush, not the payoff. Bettors are many; winners are few. That’s what makes it a reliably profitable business. Like insurance. The premiums for participating in the game outweigh the payouts the company makes as incentives to keep the players playing.
So, how exciting would it be if, say, somebody devised a system that used simple math to give a blackjack player the edge over the dealer? 21 is “inspired by” the real-life story of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) students who took Las Vegas casinos for millions, but has been reshaped to fit a simple movie template — and it’s nearly as much fun as watching an insurance professional compute actuarial tables.
In 21, the worst thing a gamester can be accused of is gambling. “Don’t give in to your emotions,” MIT professor Micky Rosa tells his blackjack students. “Play the system.” Good advice for a card-counting scheme. Bad advice for a movie. If you want to see how a formatted screenplay looks when it’s actually on the screen (you can just about count the page numbers as they flip by, and maybe measure the margins, too), 21 may provide a practical lesson: How to follow all the “rules” and end up with zero. It’s not unwatchable, but you could watch it with your eyeballs tied behind your back and enjoy it just as much.
PHOTOS COURTESY OF SONY
Here’s another example of a good story turned into a purely generic one — no doubt with the aid of a Bob McKee screenwriting seminar and textbook.
Act I: MIT undergrad Ben Campbell (Jim Sturgess) is a smart-nerd Bostonian white guy working with his best friends (a fat guy and a Persian-American guy) on a project for a robotics competition. He really needs a US$300,000 scholarship to get into Harvard Medical School, but he’s only one of 72 talented prospects. He’s recruited by professor Rosa (Kevin Spacey) to join a secret cabal of card-counters with a scheme to hit Vegas on weekends and make a fortune. He resists. A Beautiful Girl (Kate Bosworth) attempts to woo him. He resists. OK, he really needs the money, so he joins up — but just until he can get the money he needs for school. He learns the blackjack system in a montage sequence or two and passes the test. The Beautiful Girl rebuffs his advances in an attempt to maintain a strictly professional relationship.
Act II: The team goes to Vegas and they win. Another montage sequence? Maybe. It’s getting a little fuzzy. But wait: A casino security guy named Cole Williams (Laurence Fishburne) starts to notice something — and not a moment too soon because he’s losing all his business to high-tech biometric face-recognition software. Technology! Drat! Card-counting isn’t illegal, but the casinos want you to know that if you’re caught doing it, they might take you down in the basement and beat the living craps out of you.
PHOTOS COURTESY OF SONY
The Hard Rock Casino comps Beautiful Girl a suite in which she and Ben enjoy a brief, soft-focus sex-scene montage. “It seemed too good to be true,” Ben says in voice-over. “And it felt like it was never going to end.” It does. Ben is not the same guy he was back in Boston. He loses — money, his friends, the Beautiful Girl, his mentor, everything. Bummer.
Act III: Ben has one last chance. He makes up with Micky and Girl, and the team reunites for one last Big Score in Vegas. Everything works out exactly as the screenwriters have planned. The End.
Meanwhile, British actor Sturgess (Across the Universe, The Other Boleyn Girl) gets to play an American with traces of a peculiar accent (based on Jeff Ma, a Chinese-American who was called Kevin Lewis in the book); Spacey gets to alternate his slick good-cop schtick (LA Confidential) with his steely bad-cop schtick (Swimming With Sharks); director Robert Luketic (Legally Blonde, Monster-in-Law) gets to direct another picture; and Bosworth gets to wear some wigs.
PHOTOS COURTESY OF SONY
Watch for the moment when somebody obviously pulls a punch. If you hadn’t figured out the rest of the movie by then, it gives away the whole thing.
PHOTOS COURTESY OF SONY
PHOTOS COURTESY OF SONY
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
At Computex 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) urged the government to subsidize AI. “All schools in Taiwan must integrate AI into their curricula,” he declared. A few months earlier, he said, “If I were a student today, I’d immediately start using tools like ChatGPT, Gemini Pro and Grok to learn, write and accelerate my thinking.” Huang sees the AI-bullet train leaving the station. And as one of its drivers, he’s worried about youth not getting on board — bad for their careers, and bad for his workforce. As a semiconductor supply-chain powerhouse and AI hub wannabe, Taiwan is seeing
RSS