Rife with controversy, I Saw a Beast (我看見獸) is expected to generate bitterness and anger. Based on a true story and directed by Christian television director Liu I-hung (劉議鴻), it hits a raw nerve in both the homosexual and Christian communities.
The film purports to be a sermon on homosexuality, which it portrays as a sin that will only find forgiveness in the love of God, which, according to the movie, is the answer for all sinners, regardless of sexual orientation.
In I Saw a Beast, Jane, a Christian lesbian radio show hostess struggles to reconcile her faith and sexuality. She stops going to the church when church members judge her. She comes out believing that this will provide freedom, but ends up feeling trapped in a tormenting relationship with Patty, a married woman with a wealthy husband and a son.
PHOTO: COURTESY OF TAI HUNG CO
As her sense of anguish and guilt mount, Jane is petrified by a vision she has at a T-bar, in which debauched lesbians are possessed by a licentious beast. With help from sisters Lin and Chen, Jane returns to the embrace of God.
Meanwhile, Patty decides to confront her husband and leave her secure home to be with Jane, the love of her life. Little does she know that Jane's newly found faith would push her into despair, leading to a spiral of revenge and destruction.
Cinematically speaking, the film can be described as mediocre at best. What intrigues and repels is its blunt exposition of the Christian view of homosexuality told through a true story. To homosexuals and liberals, it's a tough work to digest. But the film's merits lie in its close look at a struggling believer and the chance she has to face up to opposition to her sexuality. The film promotes rational conversation, which may lead to mutual understanding and respect.
PHOTO: COURTESY OF TAI HUNG CO
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
RSS