Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) is disillusioned with Taiwan's political scene. Fed up with the constant partisan bickering and lunch-box battles in the legislature, the founder and president of the Lung Ying-tai Cultural Foundation (龍應台文化基金會) — a non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Taipei — hopes to provide an antidote to Taiwan's political chaos through hosting a series of lectures called Taipei Salon (台北沙龍). The lectures are conducted in English.
Begun last year, Lung's idea combines the French institution of literary salons with modern ideas on how to create a civil society — where an informed citizenry is empowered to make intelligent voting decisions, participate in politics and hold government and industry to account.
"[We] want to have an impact on society through intellectual discussion ... away from [the] narrow path of political fighting or reform," Lung said in an interview.
Creating a civil society is something that Lung knows a lot about. Appointed Taipei City's first cultural csar in 1999, during her four-year term she designed and implemented a cultural policy that increased the visibility of the arts in the city. With 15 book titles to her name, the current chair of arts and humanities at Tsing Hua University frequently publishes critical essays in European magazines and newspapers on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
This month's lectures begin tomorrow with Jean-Claude Poimboeuf, Director of French Institute in Taipei, who will discuss how the French maintain their unique cultural identity in the age of globalization.
On March 17, Pankaj Mishra, a novelist and contributor to the New York Times, will talk about India's path to democracy. This month's series will end on March 24 with Julian Nida-Ruemelin — professor of political theory and philosophy at the University of Munich and a former minister of culture — who will discuss the relationship between globalization and democracy.
PHOTOS COURTESY OF LUNG yINGTAI CULTURAL FOUNDATION
Past speakers include David Plott, the former editor-in-chief of The Far Eastern Economic Review and current professor of journalism at the University of Hong Kong, and Jurgen Gerbig, Director of the German Cultural Center in Taipei.
By conducting the lectures in English, Lung hopes that foreigners will attend the lectures and participate in the discussions.
"I suspect [expats] have been closed up — because of the language barrier — in their own circles, which is not fair because they are citizens of the city," she said. "But so far we have not been able to reach the expat community because we don't know where they are."
Though foreigners are invited to participate, the youth of Taiwan are the real focus of Lung's salon.
"We want to get in touch with the younger generation," she said. "We are disappointed with anyone over 40 — so we decided to carry on a dialogue with people under 40," she added jokingly.
"We want to … cultivate the minds of the younger generation so that they are open-minded ... are concerned about global issues [and] ... have compassion for the weaker, whether in terms of income, resources, or in environmental areas — global citizenship in other words.
Though a tall order, Lung has found remarkable success with Taipei Salon. The last two lectures saw the auditorium at Yuehan Hall (月涵堂) packed to capacity with everyone from high school students to young professionals.
In addition to Taipei Salon, Lung's foundation has also set up a Thinkers Salon (思沙龍), a club with seminars conducted in Chinese that exposes participants to different cultures throughout the world. Under the title "What you do not know" (你所不知道的), it has covered topics such as Latin America, North and South Korea and the conflicts between the Israelis and Palestinians.
By doing so, Lung believes the youth of Taiwan will come to see they have the power to create an efficient civil society, thus furthering the island's democratization.
"We have to … focus on the younger generation and that kind of idea leads us to do what we are doing now," she said.
Nov. 11 to Nov. 17 People may call Taipei a “living hell for pedestrians,” but back in the 1960s and 1970s, citizens were even discouraged from crossing major roads on foot. And there weren’t crosswalks or pedestrian signals at busy intersections. A 1978 editorial in the China Times (中國時報) reflected the government’s car-centric attitude: “Pedestrians too often risk their lives to compete with vehicles over road use instead of using an overpass. If they get hit by a car, who can they blame?” Taipei’s car traffic was growing exponentially during the 1960s, and along with it the frequency of accidents. The policy
While Americans face the upcoming second Donald Trump presidency with bright optimism/existential dread in Taiwan there are also varying opinions on what the impact will be here. Regardless of what one thinks of Trump personally and his first administration, US-Taiwan relations blossomed. Relative to the previous Obama administration, arms sales rocketed from US$14 billion during Obama’s eight years to US$18 billion in four years under Trump. High-profile visits by administration officials, bipartisan Congressional delegations, more and higher-level government-to-government direct contacts were all increased under Trump, setting the stage and example for the Biden administration to follow. However, Trump administration secretary
The room glows vibrant pink, the floor flooded with hundreds of tiny pink marbles. As I approach the two chairs and a plush baroque sofa of matching fuchsia, what at first appears to be a scene of domestic bliss reveals itself to be anything but as gnarled metal nails and sharp spikes protrude from the cushions. An eerie cutout of a woman recoils into the armrest. This mixed-media installation captures generations of female anguish in Yun Suknam’s native South Korea, reflecting her observations and lived experience of the subjugated and serviceable housewife. The marbles are the mother’s sweat and tears,
In mid-1949 George Kennan, the famed geopolitical thinker and analyst, wrote a memorandum on US policy towards Taiwan and Penghu, then known as, respectively, Formosa and the Pescadores. In it he argued that Formosa and Pescadores would be lost to the Chine communists in a few years, or even months, because of the deteriorating situation on the islands, defeating the US goal of keeping them out of Communist Chinese hands. Kennan contended that “the only reasonably sure chance of denying Formosa and the Pescadores to the Communists” would be to remove the current Chinese administration, establish a neutral administration and