Fernando Zulueta has an opinion on the use of cellphones at work: He loves it. Zulueta, 46, who owns a chain of charter schools in South Florida, scratches out the land-line number on his business cards so people won't use it to call him. If he is in a business meeting and his cellphone rings, he often picks it up, even though he considers such behavior annoying.
"I regret to say it," he said, speaking over one of his several cellphones, "but you see your caller ID flashing, and it happens to be a mayor or a state representative, and you say, `I'm sorry, I really have to take this call,' and you take it."
But it doesn't have to be a mayor. Recently, Zulueta interrupted a meeting to take a call from a bed deliveryman: "I like to be accessible. And I see things moving faster and faster in that direction." He said he is frustrated by people who have his cell number but call his land line anyway. "They feel they can only call the cell in an emergency," he said sadly.
Robin Reinhardt also has an opinion on cellphones at work: She hates them. Reinhardt, a vice president in charge of booking guests on MTV, prefers that people think they can call her cellphone only in an emergency. People who call her cell thinking it's more direct than going through her assistant annoy her no end.
"I'm here at my desk with three lines ringing, and people call me on my cell," she said, speaking over a land line from Los Angeles. "I get crazy."
In the great American debate about cellphone etiquette, some of the early turf battles seem to be settled, with winners and losers falling into camps familiar from Western Civ classes. Movie theaters, funerals and libraries appear to have been carried by the cell Rousseauists, who believe the social contract forbids such things as shouting intimate details into a piece of plastic in a room full of strangers.
PHOTO: NEW YORK TIMES
Public transportation systems, on the other hand, appear to belong to the cell Hobbesians, who believe that since life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short, there's no need to give the rider engrossed in her newspaper in the seat next to you a quiet commute. Restaurants constitute a middle ground, in a state of detente. Everyone knows it's rude to use a cellphone at dinner, but civilized people do it anyway.
The workplace, though, remains unsettled territory. "This is the next area," said Peggy Post, director of the Emily Post Institute and an author of The Etiquette Advantage in Business. Post, who often lectures business groups about cell use, spoke over a land line from her home office on the Florida Gulf Coast.
"We're hearing more and more stories about cellphones in the workplace," Post said, with no suggestion that any of those stories might be celebratory.
The points of friction, as Post and others describe them, are numerous: the executive who takes a cell call in the middle of a meeting; the phones that blast impossible-to-ignore ring tones in a busy office; the seminar leader who interrupts his speech to take a call on his cell; the co-worker who, like clockwork, answers hers to discuss lunch choices with a child.
Reinhardt's list of cellphone abusers includes her fiance and even her broker. "I've told him a thousand times," she said. "`Call me on my work phone.' He calls on the cell. I see his number flash, and I don't answer it. Ten minutes later he calls me on my work number."
Rebecca Hastings, the director of the information center at the Society for Human Resource Management, said: "Right now, cellphones are the cigarettes of this decade. It's an addiction. And just like cigarettes are banned from some places, so are cells banned. I think we'll see more organizations take a firmer line."
Unlike many new technologies that are beloved by users but resented by everybody else, cellphones are considered a nuisance even by the people who embrace them. A recent University of Michigan poll of 752 adults found that 6 of 10 users found public cell use "a major irritation."
Last year the Society for Human Resource Management surveyed 379 human resource professionals and found that 40 percent of their companies had formal policies governing cellphone use at work. The policies range from regulations about driving and dialing to limits on the use of personal cellphones in the office.
One reason office cell etiquette is so scattered is that different people use the phone differently. Some people flaunt their cellphones at work to show how important they are, said Hastings, whose office takes 400 calls a day for help with workplace issues. "In some office cultures, the more calls you get, the more powerful you seem," she said.
Others use the cell as an alternative communications network for the people they really want to talk to -- children, paramours, baby sitters, plumbers, gurus -- while the land line carries all the calls they want to screen out. "People tend to give their cellphone number out less frequently, and it's not printed in a phone book," Hastings said. "So they feel it's a little more direct to them. Whereas the desk phone, anybody could be calling you."
To an extent this is changing, users said. As cells embed themselves deeper into people's lives, it is only natural that cellphone numbers have become less exclusive. Most people
contacted for this article said they had long ago crossed the line where they used the cell like a Batphone for emergency calls only.
But this blurring of lines between business and personal use only makes cell use harder to regulate, said Paul Levinson, chairman of the department of communication and media studies at Fordham University and author of Cellphone: The Story of the World's Most Mobile Medium and How It Has Transformed Everything!
"It's a principle of media evolution that media are extensions of our bodies and personalities," he said. "Prior to the cellphone, the way we dressed communicated who we were in the workplace. Now, what ring tone someone has, how often the cellphone rings, how we respond to it when it rings. These are defining personality types in the office, which makes them harder to regulate than matters that aren't part of our bodies and psyches." Levinson, who spoke over a land line, said he sometimes takes calls during his media classes, but only if the conversation will edify his students.
Neil Gailmard, an optometrist in Munster, Indianna, said that two or three patients a day receive calls on their cellphones while he is treating them, despite a sign in his office asking patients to turn their phones off.
Gailmard said he was even more disturbed by doctors who take calls while seeing patients, but said he was not surprised. "I think it's rude. But what actually happens in doctors' offices is very different from what should happen."
Even while cell etiquette in the workplace is divided into the Rousseau and Hobbes schools, devices like camera phones and BlackBerries -- which let people read and send e-mail while they're supposed to be paying attention to a conference call -- are raising new questions about what is and isn't appropriate behavior at work. Two current television ads for camera phones show people using the phones to humiliate or blackmail colleagues. Needless to say, Post found this a breach of good manners. "They make most people uneasy," she said.
Hastings is of like mind. "Just as you dress for success," she said, "you need to manage your gadgets for success."
It is barely 10am and the queue outside Onigiri Bongo already stretches around the block. Some of the 30 or so early-bird diners sit on stools, sipping green tea and poring over laminated menus. Further back it is standing-room only. “It’s always like this,” says Yumiko Ukon, who has run this modest rice ball shop and restaurant in the Otsuka neighbourhood of Tokyo for almost half a century. “But we never run out of rice,” she adds, seated in her office near a wall clock in the shape of a rice ball with a bite taken out. Bongo, opened in 1960 by
Common sense is not that common: a recent study from the University of Pennsylvania concludes the concept is “somewhat illusory.” Researchers collected statements from various sources that had been described as “common sense” and put them to test subjects. The mixed bag of results suggested there was “little evidence that more than a small fraction of beliefs is common to more than a small fraction of people.” It’s no surprise that there are few universally shared notions of what stands to reason. People took a horse worming drug to cure COVID! They think low-traffic neighborhoods are a communist plot and call
The sprawling port city of Kaohsiung seldom wins plaudits for its beauty or architectural history. That said, like any other metropolis of its size, it does have a number of strange or striking buildings. This article describes a few such curiosities, all but one of which I stumbled across by accident. BOMBPROOF HANGARS Just north of Kaohsiung International Airport, hidden among houses and small apartment buildings that look as though they were built between 15 and 30 years ago, are two mysterious bunker-like structures that date from the airport’s establishment as a Japanese base during World War II. Each is just about
Over the years, whole libraries of pro-People’s Republic of China (PRC) texts have been issued by commentators on “the Taiwan problem,” or the PRC’s desire to annex Taiwan. These documents have a number of features in common. They isolate Taiwan from other areas and issues of PRC expansion. They blame Taiwan’s rhetoric or behavior for PRC actions, particularly pro-Taiwan leadership and behavior. They present the brutal authoritarian state across the Taiwan Strait as conciliatory and rational. Even their historical frames are PRC propaganda. All of this, and more, colors the latest “analysis” and recommendations from the International Crisis Group, “The Widening
RSS