The Manchus of the Ching dynasty court had much to account for in China's spectacular decline and eventual defeat by imperial forces in the 19th century, but they cannot be faulted for keeping bad records.
The Ching bureaucracy was obsessive about keeping tabs on everything taking place throughout the land and this has made it easier for historians to chart the slow-motion collapse that began only a few decades after the dynasty crushed the last of the Ming holdouts.
The National Palace Museum has dug up from its enormous archive of Ching dynasty historical documents a collection of memos, maps, illustrations and court-commissioned accounts that explain quite vividly the heights to which the Ching army rose and the depths to which it eventually sank.
Eternal Vigilance -- Special Exhibition of Ching Military Documents begins with a graphic illustration of the Manchu military prowess that completely overwhelmed the Ming armies by sweeping from the north using mounted archers and cavalry.
With nimble maneuvers, the Ching banner armies chased the Ming all the way to the border with Burma before it achieved complete victory. The acceptance of the Ming defeat is shown in an illustration made by a Ching court historian.
Having deposed the Ming, the Ching felt its rule was perpetually threatened by destabilizing forces both within and without the kingdom and was almost constantly embarking on campaigns to pacify uprisings. This is especially apparent in the exhibition's attention to the Ching pacification of the territories to the west of current-day Lanzhou in Gansu Province, the untamed Muslim areas of China.
Documents on exhibit sent between the Beijing court and regional officials show how the Ching sought to fortify its camps and outposts against attack by Muslim separatists at Jiayuguan, the westernmost reach of the Great Wall and at Aksu, a tiny garrison town on the Tibetan plateau in Qinghai Province. Commanders call for the reinforcement of walls and the repositioning of outposts in beautifully scripted calligraphy scrolls.
One of the most spectacular items on display is a colored illustration of the final defeat of the Taiping rebellion, the breakaway group led by a man who believed he was Jesus' Chinese brother and which occupied most of southern China in the 1860s.
The picture shows dozens of imperial naval destroyers mounting a surprise attack with stunning detail in the banners flown by the ships and the expressions of the hapless rebels being slaughtered.
Victory over the Taiping, however, was nothing to celebrate for the Ching, since the uprising killed millions of people and further exposed the weakness of the regime. Already the Ching had been trounced by British and French forces in two wars, one ill-fated battle of which is shown in a ship movement illustration.
Many of the documents on display are letters or lists of materials written by regional officials and sent to Beijing, but there are sufficient illustrations to clarify what is provided in writing.
Taken as a whole, they show how the agile Manchu army became sedentary, inward looking and eventually lost the innovative strategies that led it to victory.
For anyone interested in Chinese military history or imperial commissioned artworks, this special exhibition is a rare occasion that the National Palace Museum is probably alone in being able to provide.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS