This book is one of a series from Columbia University Press offering an overview of selected major aspects of American history. There has been one on the 1960s, one on the Cold War, and one on American women in the 19th century. This new addition to the series looks at the history of Asian peoples settling in the US. It is appropriately written by a senior expert in the field, Gary Okihiro, the author of an earlier prizewinning book on Asian Americans, Margins and Mainstreams (1994), and a past president of the Association for Asian American Studies.
When Columbus set sail westwards he thought he was going to Asia, and when he eventually made landfall he called the inhabitants "Indians." Once the new European settlement was established, it began to trade with and influence its nearest neighbors -- Hawaii was annexed, Japan forced to "open," and the Philippines colonized. (Kipling invented the phrase "the white man's burden" as the title of a poem intended to bolster American spirit in the struggle to subdue Filipino resistance.)
Asian people as a result started to appear in the US. Today more than half the immigrants to the US are from Asia, the Asian American growth rate far exceeds those of other groups, including whites, African Americans and Latinos.
But the very concept of "Asian" was from the start a European one, lumping together populations from a huge diversity of political entities and cultural traditions covering a third of the globe. From 1850 to World War II the immigration policy of the US put Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Indians and Filipinos together in one undifferentiated group. This classification has interestingly persisted into academic studies such as the present one, though Professor Okihiro suggests it may not last for much longer.
This aims to be an even-handed, impartial book, summarizing debates rather than taking a partisan part in them. As such, it feels in some ways old-fashioned. But what it does most successfully is supply a way into a complex area for the semi-specialist reader, even though its approach remains essentially academic.
Its many pages of references, for instance, include many works -- such as anti-Asian tracts and works of racist fiction -- that more rigorous academic studies might well disdain. There are additional massed titles in different sections of the text. If you want to start a study in this area, in other words, Okihiro will point you to the most important places to begin.
There is nevertheless some detail, and the section on anti-Asianism contains particularly horrifying incidents. Indeed, the entire "yellow peril" syndrome, reinforced by fictional creations such as Sax Rohmer's The Insidious Dr Fu-Manchu of 1913, is sickening in the extreme. This fabrication combined with the idea of Asian women as especially seductive, so that as a result Asian women became objects of desire, and Asian men objects of fear. Both perceptions can even be seen as shadowy presences lying beneath actual historical events like the Vietnam War.
One of the benefits of the book is that, because it covers a huge area in a concise way, it gives a sense of perspective to current events. How much of this kind of prejudice, for example, still lies behind some of the Asian policies of the dominant Western powers? Translated into economic terms, fear of the oriental can be seen as recently as 1992 in Michael Crichton's anti-Japanese novel Rising Sun (which even contained a bibliography, giving it the spurious status of an objective work). Yet again the threat from the East is seen as connected with sexual allure. In this book, writes Okihiro, "America is symbolized as a `small-town girl,'" a blond "American beauty long-stemmed rose," who prostitutes herself to men with cash from Japan. "Her aberrant tastes and inexplicable naivete ... results in her demise, on the forty-sixth floor of the Japanese-built Nakamoto Tower in Japantown, Los Angeles." The cause of genuine understanding, in other words, still has its influential and best-selling enemies.
Such attitudes are hideously dangerous. They are the pretexts that allow men to later bomb cities without considering their victims as fully human at all. The two European wars with Germany were accompanied by extraordinarily extensive racist anti-German propaganda in Britain, the Vietnamese were dehumanized by the widespread use of insulting and racist terms during the Vietnam War, and even the ancient Greeks stigmatized those living to their east as essentially feminine, and naturally subject to both domination by despots and conquest by more masculine cultures.
But the academy is working hard to redress the balance. The 1960s and 1970s, says Okihiro, saw an almost equal number of books published in the US on Asian Americans to those produced from the 19th century to 1959. Almost all of these, presumably, were aimed at putting the historical record straight, and confronting racist and white-supremacist assumptions.
This book is exactly what its title says it is, a guide -- something with which to orient yourself. The author maps the field, and the work is full of statements such as "this author claims this" and "a useful analysis of this phenomenon is this study." What it is emphatically not is dogmatic, one-sided or campaigning. As such it's likely to prove useful as a general introduction, and particularly as a work of reference.
May 26 to June 1 When the Qing Dynasty first took control over many parts of Taiwan in 1684, it roughly continued the Kingdom of Tungning’s administrative borders (see below), setting up one prefecture and three counties. The actual area of control covered today’s Chiayi, Tainan and Kaohsiung. The administrative center was in Taiwan Prefecture, in today’s Tainan. But as Han settlement expanded and due to rebellions and other international incidents, the administrative units became more complex. By the time Taiwan became a province of the Qing in 1887, there were three prefectures, eleven counties, three subprefectures and one directly-administered prefecture, with
Taiwan Power Co (Taipower, 台電) and the New Taipei City Government in May last year agreed to allow the activation of a spent fuel storage facility for the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in Shihmen District (石門). The deal ended eleven years of legal wrangling. According to the Taipower announcement, the city government engaged in repeated delays, failing to approve water and soil conservation plans. Taipower said at the time that plans for another dry storage facility for the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Wanli District (萬里) remained stuck in legal limbo. Later that year an agreement was reached
What does the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in the Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) era stand for? What sets it apart from their allies, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)? With some shifts in tone and emphasis, the KMT’s stances have not changed significantly since the late 2000s and the era of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) current platform formed in the mid-2010s under the guidance of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and current President William Lai (賴清德) campaigned on continuity. Though their ideological stances may be a bit stale, they have the advantage of being broadly understood by the voters.
In a high-rise office building in Taipei’s government district, the primary agency for maintaining links to Thailand’s 108 Yunnan villages — which are home to a population of around 200,000 descendants of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) armies stranded in Thailand following the Chinese Civil War — is the Overseas Community Affairs Council (OCAC). Established in China in 1926, the OCAC was born of a mandate to support Chinese education, culture and economic development in far flung Chinese diaspora communities, which, especially in southeast Asia, had underwritten the military insurgencies against the Qing Dynasty that led to the founding of