Fifteen years after its conception, Performance Workshop Theater's The Peach Blossom Land is back on the stage and seemingly more relevant than ever.
The work, which debuted in 1986 -- at a time when China and Taiwan were making their first tentative steps towards dialog -- created a sensation for the boldness of its conception as well as its technical excellence.
Performance Workshop Theater and its members have since gone on to further artistic achievements in theater, film and television, but The Peach Blossom Land has continued to grow in stature and has become a classic of Taiwan theater.
PHOTO COURTESY OF PERFORMANCE WORKSHOP THEATER
In 1991, when the show was taken on tour in the US, Newsweek trumpeted The Peach Blossom Land as "the most recent piece of evidence that Taiwan is creating the boldest Chinese art in Asia today."
The core of the play is a short story by the poet Tao Yuan-ming (AD 365-427) called The Peach Blossom Land -- the Chinese Utopia. This essay is familiar to almost every Chinese child, and many people, regardless of literary pretensions, can quote from it.
The story tells of a fisherman who one day travels farther along the river than usual and suddenly finds himself in a land filled with peach blossoms.
PHOTO: IAN BATHOLOMEW
Here, people live untroubled by the outside world, ignorant of violence and war, in a idealized pastoral environment.
The fisherman stays with them for some time, then returns back to the outside world.
He is told not to reveal the whereabouts of the peach blossom land, but he ignores this warning, so when he tries to bring people there with him, he is unable to find it again.
The Peach Blossom Land contains at least two separate plays -- and possibly three, or more, depending on how much you read into it. In one of the plays, a group of actors seek to present a comic version of Tao's story.
Their rehearsal is disrupted by the presence of another group rehearsing a tragedy.
This second play tells the story of two young lovers who meet in Shanghai in the 1940s but are then separated by war, only to meet again many years later in Taipei.
Echoing the fisherman's longing for the Peach Blossom Land in Tao's classic, the modern play, called Blind Love, tells of the yearning of many Taiwanese for a China that has long disappeared.
The theatrical conventions of Blind Love are those of television melodrama and are in sharp counterpoint to the comedy presented by the other group of actors, which draws heavily on traditional operatic conventions.
In addition to these two plays, there is the interaction between the members of the two groups, who need to divide up stage time so they can both rehearse. Both want the use of the whole stage, and on the one occasion when they are on stage together, the two plays meld in a humorous set piece of mismatched dialog that becomes an apt analogy for current cross-strait dialog.
Behind all the histrionics, the actors get on with their own lives, squabbling with the director and connecting to the very mundane world via mobile phones between acts. One of the outstanding achievements of the play is that the comedy and farce, both crucial to the play's popular appeal, never demean the very real tragedy of displacement and lost love represented in the melodrama Blind Love.
While none of the themes are new, the acceptance of The Peach Blossom Land as a classic of Taiwan's modern theatrical corpus is an indication that perhaps people are now able to see the island's tragic history for what it is -- something not without absurdity and, in any case, belonging to the past, where it should remain.
The language of the play is full of puns and allusions both to modern Taiwanese history and to Tao's classic essay; nevertheless, the quality of the acting makes the play accessible to an international audience.
With the aid of an English synopsis thoughtfully provided in the program, English-speaking audiences will have little difficulty in feeling their way through the complex network of interactions that make up the play.
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
Toward the outside edge of Taichung City, in Wufeng District (霧峰去), sits a sprawling collection of single-story buildings with tiled roofs belonging to the Wufeng Lin (霧峰林家) family, who rose to prominence through success in military, commercial, and artistic endeavors in the 19th century. Most of these buildings have brick walls and tiled roofs in the traditional reddish-brown color, but in the middle is one incongruous property with bright white walls and a black tiled roof: Yipu Garden (頤圃). Purists may scoff at the Japanese-style exterior and its radical departure from the Fujianese architectural style of the surrounding buildings. However, the property