Ukrainian drones have strayed into Baltic countries’ airspace, sowing confusion and raising tensions with Russia at a time when the US’ commitment to NATO’s collective security is in question.
The airspace incursions have occurred as Ukraine, seeking to land heavier blows on Russia four years after Moscow’s full-scale invasion, uses exploding drones to hit Russian Baltic ports that handle nearly 40 percent of national oil and gas exports.
In most cases, Kyiv and the Baltic states have confirmed the stray drones are Ukrainian, but have blamed Russia for causing them to deviate from their flight path with the use of electronic defenses that jam or spoof signals.
Such devices are widely used by Russia and Ukraine to disrupt the navigation of enemy drones and missiles.
Russia has suggested the Baltic states are colluding to let Ukraine use their airspace to stage attacks on Russian targets. The Baltic states and Ukraine deny this.
The Baltic states in the NATO military alliance — Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia -— are staunch supporters of Kyiv and accuse Russia of using escalatory language to intimidate them in the hope they would persuade Ukraine to stop its attacks.
“They’re desperately now using any kind of opportunity to divide the Western part of the world and ... to put more pressure on Ukraine not to launch these attacks,” Estonian Minister of Foreign Affairs Margus Tsahkna said in a phone interview.
Most of the drones have caused no damage, crashing into open fields or flying back out of Baltic airspace, but there is a sense of growing unease.
A NATO military jet shot down a suspected Ukrainian drone in Estonia on Tuesday last week, in what NATO told Reuters was the first time its military jet mission in the Baltics had “fired a missile in defense of the Alliance” since the three states joined in 2004.
On Wednesday last week, Lithuanian lawmakers were forced to take shelter underground as a drone approached Vilnius. The following day, an air alert was issued in northern Lithuania.
“The threat level is growing. Drones are flying in. They are Ukrainian, but some are loaded with explosives and can hit civilian objects. We must protect people,” Lithuanian Minister of National Defense Robertas Kaunas told Reuters.
Asta Skaisgiryte, chief adviser on foreign policy to the president of Lithuania, said the Baltics were facing a particularly intense phase now because of progress by Ukraine in drone warfare that is making its long-range attacks more potent.
She said it was possible Russia was deliberately redirecting drones to fly into neighboring states.
Several drones have entered Baltic airspace undetected, highlighting gaps in air defenses on NATO’s border with Russia and Belarus.
Latvian Prime Minister Evika Silina was forced to resign after firing her defense minister, blaming him for a lack of air defenses.
Despite unequivocal support for Ukraine, Estonian officials have told Kyiv that airspace incursions are not helpful and said they expect Ukraine to control its drones better.
A Ukrainian military source said a “serious” investigation was underway to determine how Russia was causing Ukrainian drones to veer from their flight path into Baltic airspace.
A senior Swedish military source said Ukraine was flying its drones deliberately close to the Baltic border with Russia, using it as a kind of shield, knowing Russia would not want to fire into NATO territory and risk direct confrontation.
Ukraine’s foreign ministry denied that. It accused Russia of jamming the drones to deliberately direct them toward the Baltics and said Kyiv picks flight paths that minimize any threat to its Baltic allies.
“We have intelligence about Russia deliberately doing this, these are not just abstract claims on our side,” said Heorhii Tykhyi, spokesperson for Ukraine’s foreign ministry.
Russia’s embassies in Vilnius and Stockholm did not reply to requests for comment for this story.
Last week, Russia’s ambassador to the UN told a Security Council meeting Moscow had information that Ukraine planned to launch military drones from inside Latvia and other Baltic states, and warned that Russia would fire back.
Although Latvia’s envoy dismissed his comments as “pure fiction,” Russia’s foreign intelligence service, the SVR, said Riga had agreed to the arrangement despite fearing it would become “a victim of Moscow’s retaliatory strike.”
Tsahkna and Kaunas said they interpreted such statements as a sign of weakness by Russia as it struggles to counter Ukrainian drones or advance significantly on the battlefield.
Linas Kojala, head of the Vilnius-based Geopolitics and Security Studies Center, said there was a risk of accidental miscalculation from “provocative” Russian actions.
“The tensions are high, there is a risk of an unintended escalation,” he told Reuters.
Although European politicians see Russia as a major threat, the US, which is NATO’s biggest military power and has tens of thousands of troops in Europe, has sent mixed signals over its commitment to the continent’s defense.
US President Donald Trump has suggested the US could even leave NATO, and Washington said this month it was delaying a troop deployment to Poland, but days later announced it was sending an additional 5,000 personnel.
A Baltic security official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said his agency viewed Russia’s rhetoric as predominantly designed for domestic consumption to focus attention on the “war-mongering Europeans.”
“They want to hide the fact that they are actually struggling in coping with the Ukrainian drone attacks,” the official said. “From our perspective, the security situation in the region has not changed.”
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
“Of course you can choose not to be Taiwanese, just do not stay here,” chairwoman of Taipei 101 operator Taipei Financial Center Corp Janet Chia (賈永婕) said in an online interview with local entertainer Tai Chih-yuan (邰智源), triggering intense discussion on social media, with politicians across party lines weighing in. In the interview, which was aired on May 14, Chia and Tai’s discussion over a meal in Taipei 101 covered Chia’s career change from entertainer to chairwoman and US climber Alex Honnold’s free solo climb up the Taipei 101 building. During the interview, Chia said, “Being on this land, we