It has been China’s long-held dream to dethrone King Dollar. Beijing got its first break after Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine and Russian lenders were deleted overnight from the system that moves the world’s money. However, back in 2022, the yuan was nowhere close to confronting the hegemon. It would take four more years of preparation — and another war — to make it a contender.
I said in early February that those looking for evidence of the challenge to the US currency in payment flows were searching in the wrong place and that for years to come, de-dollarization would remain hidden in alterations to financial infrastructure.
That was before the US-Israeli war on Iran. A lot has changed in the past six weeks. China is the largest buyer of Iran’s seaborne oil. The price its refineries pay stays in “controlled accounts” at small Chinese banks cut off from dollar trade. These funds are used to pay Chinese contractors or cover imports, an “oil-for-goods” swap, the Atlantic Council said. And now Tehran says that it could accept toll payments from ships crossing the Strait of Hormuz in cryptocurrencies or the yuan.
Illustration: Mountain People
THREE-PRONG THREAT
It is a rebellion against US financial hegemony on three fronts simultaneously: the payment currency, the messaging system and the settlement mechanism. Were a peace plan to remove US sanctions against Iran, the greenback might regain some of the trust it has lost. However, China’s currency is not going away. It would simply lie in wait for the next geopolitical crisis.
At about 50 percent of all international payments, the US dollar’s dominance is stark. The yuan’s share, according to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), is just 2.7 percent, lower than in 2024. Yet China is serious about pitching its currency as an alternative. The digital version, e-yuan, moves over the blockchain. The technology integrates messaging, reconciliation and asset transfer into a single, seamless operation, bypassing SWIFT, the panopticon through which the US surveils global financial flows. Project mBridge, a digital platform shared by the central banks of China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia, has already processed more than US$55 billion in trade, with the e-yuan accounting for 95 percent of the volume.
However, the blockchain is still a small part of how claims get disposed of. Most international transfers gravitate to a New York private institution, the Clearing House Interbank Payments System (CHIPS). Its participants liquidate obligations using pre-funded accounts at the US Federal Reserve. They all maintain US offices and are subject to US law.
Beijing’s discomfort is about that particular. The US Department of Justice built its bank-fraud and wire-fraud case against Huawei Technologies Co chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟) by finding US dollar transactions routed through CHIPS in New York. In US law, the moment a digit representing a dollar touches a server on US soil for even a millisecond, it grants the US government jurisdiction.
To bypass CHIPS, China has developed its own Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, or CIPS, which clears payments in yuan. Last month, when the Iran war flared up, CIPS handled a record 921 billion yuan (US$135.1 billion) in average daily volumes, nearly a 50 percent jump from the previous month.
INCREMENTAL CHANGE
Although that is a fraction of the US$2.2 trillion that passes through New York, the growth of the alternative network is worth noting. The data showed a remarkable transformation, galvanized by structural and geopolitical shifts. In 2021, CIPS was a quiet utility, averaging roughly 350 billion yuan in daily turnover. By early 2024, it had breached the 600 billion yuan ceiling.
The trigger was Washington’s December 2023 executive order authorizing secondary sanctions on foreign banks facilitating trade for Russia. Fearing a total disconnect from the US dollar, banks in the UAE, Turkey and Central Asia scrambled to migrate their settlement to the yuan. China’s weak domestic economy helped. Disinflation led to lower onshore interest rates just when the cost of borrowing US dollars was rising. That boosted the attractiveness of the Chinese currency in trade financing.
Hong Kong banks have doubled their permissioned access to onshore Chinese liquidity amid strong client demand for yuan-denominated loans. Last year, DBS Group Holdings Ltd’s Singapore unit became an overseas direct participant of CIPS. Banks connecting directly to CIPS using its internal messaging protocol — bypassing SWIFT entirely — have grown by about 40 percent since 2024, reaching 193 institutions. With just 42 members, CHIPS, the New York club, is a lot more elitist.
As analysts Benn Steil and Yuma Schuster said in a Council on Foreign Relations report last month, the decline in the yuan’s share in SWIFT payments data is misleading: It does not mean less usage; it means that trade messages have gone private and become less visible.
Back in 2020, Syracuse University professor Daniel McDowell said that the more the US wields its unmatched financial power, the less it might have left. Subsequent events have proved him right. After all, if payments accompanying 20 percent of the world’s oil and gas can move through a digital pipe that the US Department of the Treasury cannot see, then US dominance of global finance has been handed an expiration date.
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services in Asia. Previously, he worked for Reuters, the Straits Times and Bloomberg News. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS