William Shakespeare wrote in Romeo and Juliet: “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” Following that logic, surrender — by any other name — would remain just as tragic.
When two dogs face off, tucking in one’s tail means submission. There is an even more obsequious gesture: By rolling onto its back and exposing its belly, a dog is not only refusing to fight back, but is also assuring it would not even try to flee. So, in the canine world, “lying flat” (tang ping, 躺平) for peace — which is what the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is suggesting our youth do in the face of threats from China — is nothing less than to surrender in exchange for peace.
At the very least, when someone raises their hands in surrender, they are still standing like a person. Does a “lying flat” kind of surrender even remotely resemble a person with a backbone?
Take a look at how the KMT set the stage for the so-called “vision” and “prospects” of this week’s meeting between KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The party posted a video on its YouTube account in which people were lying on the ground, promoting the slogan: “Only with peace can we lie flat. Peace above all.”
This, coupled with what figures such as Cheng have long extolled — unification — the party’s logic becomes clear: Only through unification — which is effectively just another word for surrender — could there be peace, and only with peace could people “lie flat.”
The problem is that history tells a different story. Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang and Tibet — which signed peace agreements with China’s governing authorities in 1947, 1949 and 1951 respectively — did not escape the outcome of violent repression.
The KMT’s narrative that unification would lead to peace and allow Taiwanese to “lie flat” is an oversimplification that conceals the core premise. The reality is that unification, or surrender, would lead to signing some form of a peace agreement, which in turn would allow people to “lie flat” in a grave, prison, re-education camp or an operating table as their organs are harvested while still alive.
Peace has never been a result of surrender. Rather, tragedy is the only consequence of surrender.
Whether in power or serving as the opposition, the KMT’s philosophy for survival has always been the same. Domestically, it maximizes personal gain while otherwise doing the bare minimum. Internationally, it “lies flat” — opposing military procurement and armament, and refusing to fight. Fully aware that there is no such thing as a “free lunch,” the KMT still indulges in the fantasy of free peace. Is a KMT that touts “lying flat,” an extension of its lazy opportunism, anything other than a malignant tumor that Taiwan urgently needs to remove?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
The ongoing Iran conflict is putting Taiwan’s energy fragility on full display — the island of 23 million people, home to the world’s most advanced semiconductor manufacturing, is highly dependent on imported oil and gas, especially that from the Middle East. In 2025, 69.6 percent of Taiwan’s crude oil and 38.7 percent of liquified natural gas were sourced from the Middle East. In the same year, 62 percent of crude oil and 34 percent of LNG to Taiwan went through the Strait of Hormuz. Taiwan’s state-run oil company CPC Corp’s benchmark crude oil price (70 percent Dubai, 30 percent Brent)