The White House’s struggles to negotiate an off-ramp in Iran are a reminder of how crucial skilled diplomacy can be. Yet the US Department of State appears intent on purging and politicizing the ranks of the nation’s top envoys. US Congress has a duty to push back.
Out of 195 ambassadorial postings around the world, more than 110 sat empty as of early last month — including in countries as vital to US interests as Germany and South Korea. About three dozen of those openings were created after US President Donald Trump’s administration abruptly recalled a slew of career diplomats at the end of last year. Traditionally, career foreign-service officers have occupied about two-thirds of available positions, with the rest handed out to political appointees. That proportion has now reversed. Worse: Only six out of the 75 ambassadors nominated by Trump in his second term have been trained diplomats.
The risks of ignoring diplomatic expertise should be self-evident. Nuclear analysts have questioned whether war with Iran might have been averted if the administration had properly understood its initial offer and negotiating strategy. Meanwhile, recent political appointees have offended host governments from Poland to Chile with attacks on local politicians. In an interview with Tucker Carlson, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee outraged the US’ Arab allies by implying Israel should annex a huge swath of the Middle East. French authorities have summoned US Ambassador to France Charles Kushner not once but twice to complain about interference in their domestic affairs.
Even if allies and adversaries understand that Trump is liable to upend policy at any moment, experienced ambassadors still serve an essential function. They can relay local knowledge and insight to inform policymaking in Washington. They can interpret administration actions and calm nerves in foreign capitals, cultivating support for US policies and forestalling resistance. Above all, they can protect Americans abroad: Only four of the 12 US embassies bordering or near Iran had ambassadors in place when war broke out, which helps explain the lack of an evacuation plan for civilians in the region.
If the White House continues down this path, the US’ once-respected diplomatic corps could lose invaluable institutional knowledge and credibility. Boorish behavior would undermine US partnerships and soft power, as happened to China after its “wolf warrior” diplomats provoked a global backlash. Partisanship might start to infect the professional diplomatic corps — which for decades has promoted US policies regardless of party — as officials angle for promotion. The more positions that are left vacant or assigned to donors and flatterers, the more gaps each new administration would have to fill when there is a change in power.
The US president has the right to appoint officials he trusts, but US Congress also has an obligation to ensure the nation’s diplomatic service remains strong and capable. Legislators should press the White House to start nominating career diplomats to fill as many ambassadorships as possible, without asking for their partisan bona fides. Oversight committees should speed along the nominations of experienced diplomats while demanding that political appointees at least demonstrate a modicum of knowledge about their destination and due respect for local cultures and priorities. The career-versus-political balance should be shifted back toward the historical norm.
As long as the US has global interests, it would need skilled diplomats to promote and protect them. US Congress should ensure that network is not crippled from abuse or neglect.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS