Last week, Israel passed a law that institutionalizes the execution of Palestinians. The country’s courts can now impose death sentences on Palestinians “convicted of fatal attacks,” expanding a legal system designed to target them, strip them of rights, subject them to systematic abuse and ultimately, shield Israeli perpetrators of crimes against Palestinians from accountability. While this legislation does not create a wholly new reality, it marks the beginning of a troubling new phase of Israel’s oppression of Palestinians by enshrining into law a longstanding policy of using lethal force against them. Disturbingly, this reality is already normalized in Israel.
Long before this law, Palestinians were being systematically killed. In Gaza, mass killing has continued even after the declaration of a “ceasefire.” In the West Bank, Palestinians are killed on a daily basis by the Israeli military in raids, shootings and increasingly, by violent settler militias aimed at driving them from their land and out of their communities. For some time, Israeli soldiers and settlers have been able to act with near-total impunity.
The same reality has been starkly visible in Israel’s prison network. In the months since October 2023, Israel has increased the number of Palestinians in its detention system to more than 10,000, many of them without trial, with no meaningful opportunity to defend themselves. They are held in conditions that, in effect, turn Israel’s prison system into a network of torture camps, where Palestinians are subjected to systematic violence, abuse and deliberate starvation.
More than 80 Palestinians have died in Israeli custody during this period amid documented abuse, inhumane conditions and denial of medical treatment. The new law does not break from this system; it extends it, embedding its logic more deeply in the legal framework. Now, many more Palestinians would legally die in detention. This law emerges under a political leadership that openly embraces violence and dehumanization, led by senior government ministers who have built their power on incitement and the normalization of harm against Palestinians. Its promotion in the media has featured rhetoric that glorifies killing, including discussions that veered into graphic and disturbingly callous descriptions of executions, reflecting a broader societal shift in which Palestinian lives are increasingly seen as expendable.
As B’Tselem showed last year in its report Our Genocide, the dehumanization of Palestinians is a long-term process. That process helps explain how a law such as this becomes both imaginable and acceptable to large parts of Israeli society. The legislation faces virtually no political opposition and hardly provokes public debate in Israel.
Globally, democratic states have been moving away from the death penalty, recognizing it as a violation of fundamental human rights both domestically and internationally. At a time when international law itself is under growing attack, Israel is not an exception but a central driver of this erosion, maintaining systems of lethal violence and oppression against Palestinians and embedding them more deeply within its legal framework. Israel still presents itself as a democracy, but a state that institutionalizes the execution of one population under its control while subjecting it to systemic violence and discrimination is not democratic; it is a system of lethal control.
All of this is already plainly visible. The debate is not about facts. It is about recognizing Israel for what it is: a state that systematically kills Palestinians with impunity and erodes international law and basic moral norms. What is happening to Palestinians is already reshaping political and moral boundaries beyond Palestine, including in the US. As this is tolerated, it spreads. Once the dismantling of international law and basic protections for human life is accepted in one place, it becomes far easier to justify everywhere.
Yuli Novak is the executive director of B’Tselem.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng