Taiwanese media are not only ignoring the suffering of civilians in conflicts in Iran, Lebanon and the West Bank, they are treating it as irrelevant.
On a typical political talk show, the pattern is unmistakable. Familiar commentators — former Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Julian Kuo (郭正亮), former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator and host Alex Tsai (蔡正元) — circle the same themes: Is the US distracted? Does China benefit from conflict in the Middle East? Does war in the Middle East raise risks for Taiwan?
What is largely missing is the most basic fact of war: civilians dying.
When mentioned at all, it is often reduced to a passing phrase — “collateral damage” — before the discussion quickly returns to strategy. Civilian suffering is not denied; it is simply downgraded to background noise.
That reflects a deeper habit in Taiwanese meia of filtering global events through a single question: Does this help or harm Taiwan?
Taiwan is not a distant observer of geopolitics. It lives under the shadow of an immediate and growing existential threat from China. In such a context, it is neither surprising nor unreasonable that public discourse prioritizes survival over distant humanitarian concerns.
The problem is when strategy becomes the only lens.
Taiwan’s commentariat often treats the US as a stable, rational, strategic actor that can allocate military resources across regions at will. Some pro-US President Donald Trump or pro-strongman narratives go further, implying that US foreign policy is driven primarily by the will of a single leader.
That is a serious misreading.
In the US, civilian suffering is not a side issue; it is a political force. Media coverage, congressional debates and public protests revolve around whether wars are justified, whether force is proportional and whether the US is complicit in civilian harm.
Supporters of military action must defend these questions; critics weaponize them. Either way, civilian deaths shape the debate.
In the US, strategy does not override morality — it is constrained by it.
The US is a democracy with built-in volatility. Midterm elections can swiftly shift congressional control and undercut ongoing military commitments. Courts can impose meaningful limits on executive power. Media scrutiny and public opinion can intensify rapidly when civilian casualties rise.
When humanitarian concerns escalate, the political space for strategic action can shrink just as quickly.
What Taipei sees as “US distraction” is often not a matter of capability, but of legitimacy.
Ignoring this dynamic leads to flawed conclusions. Analysts who focus solely on carrier deployments and force posture, while overlooking domestic political pressure, are working with an incomplete model of US power.
Taiwan has long grounded its international identity in democracy and human rights. Yet when civilian suffering elsewhere is consistently treated as irrelevant, that moral narrative risks becoming hollow.
A society that understands its own vulnerability should also understand the suffering of others — not as a distraction, but as part of the same moral universe it seeks support from.
None of that means Taiwan should abandon strategic thinking. On the contrary, it means taking strategy more seriously.
Power defines what is possible, but in a democracy like the US, politics defines what is sustainable. Civilian deaths are not background noise. They are variables that can reshape policy.
If Taiwan’s media continue to filter global conflicts solely through the question of “what does this mean for us?” they will not only misread distant wars, but also misread the very ally the nation depends on.
That misreading could carry consequences far beyond the Middle East.
Simon Tang is an adjunct professor at California State University, Fullerton, who lectures on international relations.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
RSS