A flaw in lineage citizenship
Taiwan continues to review and debate immigration reform, including as noted in “Lawmakers question eased migrant domestic worker rules” (April 2, page 4) which identified the concern of “shift[ing] the care burden from the state onto families.” However, overlooked is the significant burden already placed on Taiwanese families through a legislative gap that has no reasonable basis: The status in Taiwan of children born before 1980.
Taiwan only recognized a mother’s right to pass citizenship to her children in 1980. I was born in Taipei in the 1970s to a Taiwanese mother and an American father, but I remain a legal foreigner in my place of birth, despite my fluency in Mandarin and deep family ties. Taiwan offers me no path to obtain citizenship, unless I undergo the extreme step of renouncing my US nationality, nor a predictable way to reside here beyond relying on my husband’s employment.
This is not an abstract legal issue; it is a barrier to my responsibilities as the primary caregiver for my aging parents and, soon, my aunts. My “foreign” status creates a precarious foundation for essential support. I spend hours a day managing my parents’ daily needs, including correcting life-threatening errors on pharmacy instructions, and advocating for them during medical visits when their symptoms are overlooked. Existing law treats the people willing to shoulder these burdens as temporary guests.
This current system is also hypocritical. My foreign-born cousins obtained Republic of China (ROC) passports through patriarchal lineage with ease; friends born outside of Taiwan now have greater rights than I do through updated maternal lineage laws inapplicable to me. Germans were recently granted greater access to become Taiwanese over those born to Taiwanese mothers on Taiwanese soil. A nation that rightfully prides itself on gender equality cannot leave the pre-1980 generation behind.
The mother-child bond does not expire at age 18 (the cutoff for the “minor children” naturalization path), nor should it be invalidated by a 1970’s birth certificate. We are not “foreigners.” We are a family seeking to return home and undertake our filial obligations.
Taiwan devalued our mother’s lineage in the past. This ongoing sting can end by recognizing their children as Taiwanese, and allowing us unrestricted access to establish a full life in Taiwan.
As our mothers enter the latter stages of their lives, who would support them if not their children?
Shi Qi
Taipei
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS