There is now a distinct possibility that Hungary’s main opposition party, Tisza, would defeat Viktor Orban’s ruling Fidesz party in the country’s parliamentary elections on April 12. This has prompted Tisza’s leader, Peter Magyar, to promise that, if his party wins, one of its first acts in government would be to suspend the license of the Media Services and Support Trust Fund (MTVA), the state body that finances and oversees public media assets. Pulling the plug on the pro-Orban MTVA is long overdue.
For more than 15 years, Orban’s government has steadily erected barriers to objective reporting and tightened its grip on the media ecosystem.
Through a combination of hostile takeovers, pressure campaigns, and interference with regulators like the National Media and Infocommunications Authority, it has fundamentally altered public discourse.
As a result, 80 percent of the country’s news outlets, including formerly independent publications such as Origo and Index, have become pro-government mouthpieces.
Media capture on this scale, extensively documented in a major new study, is unprecedented in the EU and demonstrates how quickly pluralism can be destroyed through legal engineering.
My own experience underscores the calculated nature of Orban’s efforts to control the media that Hungarians consume. In 2016, I was the deputy editor-in-chief of Nepszabadsag, once the highest-circulation daily broadsheet in Hungary, when it was closed overnight. Within days, our website and massive digital archive spanning decades were inaccessible.
The takeover was orchestrated and executed by Mediaworks, a conglomerate owned by the oligarch Lorinc Meszaros, Orban’s childhood friend.
Meszaros, whose fortune was built on state contracts, now effectively controls the entire print media landscape and numerous online platforms.
By now, it is clear that the MTVA’s official commitment to impartiality is a fiction. The Budapest-based Republikon Institute recently monitored state media’s evening news broadcasts and found that Fidesz and its coalition partner received fifteen hours of positive coverage per week. By contrast, Tisza and Magyar were subjected to more than five hours of overtly critical or defamatory reporting.
With this propaganda machine at its disposal, Fidesz can steer the national conversation as it sees fit. During this campaign, character assassination and geopolitical fearmongering have featured prominently. In a desperate bid to shore up support for Orban, Hungarian public media are currently portraying him as the sole guarantor of peace in “times of war.” Another of the state’s main narratives is that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has supposedly hatched a “master plan” with the European Commission to “dethrone” Orban and install Magyar as a puppet.
Moreover, domestic “scandals” are manufactured to support the regime’s central claim: that the opposition is out of touch with Hungarians and funded by foreign interests. Last August, Index published a document that it claimed was a Tisza plan proposing a 33 percent tax rate. Even though Tisza promptly denied the veracity of the report, the story dominated the political agenda for months. Index later published the party’s alleged proposals for a “dog and cat tax,” leading the government to warn pensioners that Magyar would force them to euthanize their pets. While the Metropolitan Court eventually ruled that Tisza had nothing to do with the text, the damage was done.
These domestic smears are intended to sow doubt among the electorate and are subsequently linked to broader geopolitical grievances. For example, the regime recently stopped two cash-in-transit vehicles during a routine transfer from Austria’s Raiffeisen Bank to the State Savings Bank of Ukraine. Within minutes, pro-government outlets framed the incident as evidence of “dirty money” flowing through the country to support a foreign-controlled political opposition.
By invoking national security in its partisan propaganda, the government reinforces the idea that dissent is synonymous with treason.
The Hungarian media’s financial foundation is also fundamentally lopsided. Since 2015, the government and state-owned companies have reportedly spent in excess of 1.1 billion euros (US$1.3 billion) on advertising, funneling taxpayer money almost exclusively into Fidesz-aligned outlets.
There are, however, signs that the regime’s information monopoly is beginning to fracture.
A small number of independent newsrooms have managed to pierce the government’s propaganda shield, despite being under constant political pressure and largely starved of advertising revenue. Investigative outlets like Direkt36, Telex, and 444.hu, which have survived for years on the doggedness of their staff and the support of their readers, have chipped away at the wall of misinformation with their persistent reporting on corruption and the regime’s ties to the Kremlin. This has provided the public with a shared set of facts that the state’s coordinated megaphone has failed to suppress, creating the conditions for Tisza to emerge as a viable challenger. After 16 years, reality is proving more resilient than manufactured narratives.
This spells trouble for Orban in April’s elections. Ultimately, the independent journalism that Orban has sought to tame, but never fully muzzled, could be his government’s undoing.
Akos Toth, author of After the Conquest: How Autocrats Control the Media, was a deputy editor-in-chief of Nepszabadsag, Hungary’s largest newspaper, when it was shut down in 2016.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level