Sat, Apr 04, 2026 page8

• Taiwan’s failures on migrant labor issues

  • By Steve Ho 何不孝
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Despite calling itself a nation based on human rights, Taiwan continues to let migrant workers remain subject to the pressures of debt, precarity and fear in the workplace. This is not the institutional progress we expect; it is a distortion of our values.

  These so-called “ghost workers,” sidelined to the fringes of society, are evidence of what Taiwan still finds to be an uncomfortable reality: Despite being critical to our factories, care systems and daily life, migrant workers pay a much higher price than local workers in accessing basic labor rights, including lodging appeals, resignations and accessing financial relief.

  Recent reports have once again illustrated how many migrants, after paying brokerage fees and being saddled with debt, are forced to remain in exploitative situations, working overtime, and dealing with occupational injuries or poor conditions. The question is not whether Taiwan has laws to address this; it is whether the laws are being upheld to protect workers’ rights.

  For many of the workers, quitting would mean losing their income while remaining in debt, putting even more pressure on their household finances. For most, this is not a realistic option.

  Taiwan needs to reassess how narrowly it thinks about forced labor. It does not only occur in the most extreme fringe cases, but more often comes as institutionally packaged controls: debt burdens, document confiscations, resignation restrictions, abuses of power and costly repercussions for those who file for appeals. The same story is playing out across industry and administrative lines for migrants from a range of countries. This can no longer be dismissed as a handful of isolated cases; root institutional design flaws must finally be acknowledged.

  The situation for migrant domestic workers and in-home caregivers must also not be ignored. Taiwan’s long-term care system is under serious strain and families are feeling the pressure, but that cannot be grounds for the flattening of worker protections. It is difficult to exercise oversight for workforces that operate inside private homes in the first place; add to this ill-defined working hours, insufficient breaks and fear about asking for help and the risks only multiply.

  Deficiencies in the long-term care sector must be addressed from within, rather than outsourcing their costs to marginalized labor.

  The direction for reform is clear:

  First, recruitment fees and associated costs can no longer be passed on to workers, and a mechanism to trace, audit and offer compensation for these charges should be established.

  Second, the rights of migrant workers to change employers should receive full implementation and protections to ensure that they can leave exploitative situations safely.

  Third, mistreated workers who file appeals must be supported in post with resettlement, legal support and transfer options.

  Fourth, reforms to migrant domestic worker protections must have a clear timeline; they cannot be put off indefinitely because of in-home care’s unique circumstances. Taiwan’s issue is not that the law is not clear, but that institutions are not working to properly protect the rights and dignity of underprivileged people.

  If we use migrant workers to plug labor shortages and then deny them the ability to escape exploitation, it is not just migrant rights under threat, but the very quality of rule of law which Taiwan prides itself on.

  Democracy is no slogan, and its bench test is whether society’s most vulnerable people can exercise their basic rights.

  Steve Ho is a retired engineer.

  Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Military on alert after 2 Chinese warships spotted

  • 2

    China denounces Japan, EU over South China Sea

  • 3

    Magnitude 6.1 quake strikes off northeast coast

  • 4

    MOFA blasts Beijing after Zambia scraps RightsCon

  • 5

    Taiwan keep Thomas Cup hopes alive