As the international order shifts from one of principles to power, the most fatal error for political leaders is not holding differing positions, but misjudging reality.
This year, the world is undergoing a rapid restructuring. US President Donald Trump intervening militarily in the Middle East and attacking Iran is not merely a regional war — it marks the beginning of a reshaping of the global power structure. The international order is no longer governed by treaties and abstract norms. Rather, it has returned to a reality in which military power and strategic alliances determine the landscape. Against this backdrop, Taiwan’s strategic position has become clearer than ever before — there is no longer room for ambiguity or illusion.
However, some political forces in Taiwan remain stuck in outdated assumptions. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) line of thinking — advocating for maintaining ambiguity, avoiding provoking China and preventing overreliance on the US — appears rational, but it is built upon an international order that no longer exists. The problem lies in the mistaken belief that ambiguity can mitigate risk, that concessions can be exchanged for security and that distance can take the place of alliances — this is a classic strategic error.
In a system dominated by power, neutrality does not exist. A country that lacks a clear position is not respected, but exploited. For China, ambiguity creates room for sustained pressure. For the US, it implies unreliability. Thus, the result is not enhanced security, but passivity and fragility. “Avoiding provoking China” is itself based on a false premise — Beijing’s strategic objective is not to respond to Taiwan, but to alter the “status quo” and expand its influence.
With regard to reducing reliance on the US, the problem is not exercising caution against dependence, but the absence of any viable alternative. Refusing to cooperate with the democratic camp equates to choosing a side within the global power structure. The key is not relying — or not relying — on the US, but ensuring that Taiwan becomes a strategically valuable partner. Only by becoming indispensable could security be incorporated into broader strategic calculations.
The KMT’s problem is that it still bases its strategy on the international environment of the past three decades, seeking security through ambiguity and balance. As the world has entered a quasi-wartime system, such a strategy would only cause Taiwan to lose its initiative.
What Taiwan needs is a strategic positioning that aligns with present realities. Militarily, it should bolster asymmetric capabilities and develop a porcupine defense strategy to raise the cost of aggression. Politically, it should clearly embed itself within the Indo-Pacific region’s democratic system. Economically, it should consolidate its semiconductor advantage, centered on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Finally, it must reinforce its institutional and rhetorical legitimacy to stand firmly in reality and in principle.
History has repeatedly proven that the cost of miscalculation exceeds that of conflict itself. Ukraine failed to establish deterrence in time and ultimately paid the price of a full-scale war. Hong Kong lost its freedoms under promises that lacked real guarantees. As the international landscape and order have already changed, the KMT continues to navigate it using an outdated map — and as such, might ultimately arrive at the wrong destination.
Hsiao Hsi-huei is a freelance writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
RSS