The debate over restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County has been amplified by certain groups amid rising tensions in the Middle East, creating the impression that Taiwan is on the verge of an energy crisis and acting as if all energy-related issues could be solved by bringing the plant back online.
For the government to rush a restart on this basis would be a rash decision. However, if a restart is pursued, the following conditions must met to satisfy the most basic requirements.
The Ma-anshan plant was built when Taiwan did not yet have environmental impact assessment regulations. Therefore, the environmental conditions of the plant were not subject to thorough study or review. If a decision is made to grant the plant a typical 20-year license extension, a new environmental impact assessment should be conducted to ensure that the site is safe.
The Tsuruga nuclear power plant in Japan’s Fukui Prefecture is a representative example. When Japan moved to promote the restart of nuclear power, assessments revealed the presence of an active tectonic fault beneath the plant site. As a result, the decision was made to decommission the plant rather than to extend its operation. While the Japanese government has strong demand for nuclear energy, it still adhered to the safety first principle.
Although restarting the Ma-anshan plant would be easier than doing the same for the Kuosheng nuclear power plant in New Taipei City — where spent fuel pools are already full — necessary refurbishment and inspection remain fundamental requirements for any license extension. Cutting corners would be detrimental to public safety and the stability of the nation’s power supply.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs has said that if equipment conditions are good and limited replacements are required, the restart timeline could be shortened. Some have misinterpreted this to mean that operations could resume in as little as two years. This is a grave misunderstanding. The restart of the plant must be approached with rigor — a predetermined timeline should not be imposed simply to justify an extension. After all, the entire overhaul and inspection process for an operation extension would likely require substantial upgrades to equipment and piping to ensure safe and stable power generation in the long-term.
Lastly, there is the issue of gas supply disruptions and power outages. In operating a power grid, the possibility of any given energy source being interrupted should already be taken into account. In the short term, coal-fired power can still be used to support energy demand — it is not necessarily the case that restarting the Ma-anshan plant is the only option. In fact, coal-fired generation is a much more flexible method in wartime conditions. It differs from natural gas, which has limited storage capacity, and nuclear power plants, which carry the risk of being seized or targeted during an armed conflict.
Any restart of the Ma-anshan nuclear power plant should prioritize overall safety, rather than being driven by temporary fuel shortages or emotional blackmail and intimidation from those with particular interests. Only by truly upholding nuclear safety considerations could a restart effectively dispel public doubts — a point that even proponents of nuclear energy would likely agree on.
Chen Kuan-lin is a research manager from Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS