The US and Israeli strikes on Iran have drawn global attention, with most commentary focused on escalation risks and energy markets — but this misses the more consequential development.
For China, this is not simply a regional conflict. It is a real-time strategic experiment — a rare opportunity to observe how the US performs under simultaneous military, economic and political strain.
First, the war reveals how Washington manages trade-offs under pressure. As energy prices fluctuate and inflation concerns resurface, US policymakers face a familiar dilemma: how to sustain external military commitments while containing domestic economic costs. For Beijing, the key question is not whether the US can act, but whether it could remain strategically consistent when those costs begin to accumulate. Consistency under pressure is the real test of power.
Second, the conflict exposes the limits of the US’ military capacity. High-intensity operations require sustained use of precision munitions, intelligence coordination and long-range strike capabilities — all of which are finite. China is observing not only battlefield effectiveness, but the rate of resource consumption and, crucially, what remains available for other theaters.
Third, the war tests political endurance. As conflicts drag on, their effects are transmitted through domestic channels: rising energy prices, higher living costs and shifting public opinion. Whether political support holds under such pressure is central to assessing the sustainability of the US’ global engagement. From Beijing’s perspective, this is not about public sentiment alone, but about the durability of political will.
Iran’s ability to absorb sustained pressure and maintain regime stability sends a different signal — one that authoritarian systems are inclined to internalize. Resilience under external shock reinforces the perceived value of centralized authority, internal discipline and preemptive security control.
Taken together, the conflict becomes more than a regional crisis. It is a signal-generating environment — one in which China can evaluate US decisionmaking, military limits and political stamina in real time.
These observations would not remain theoretical.
For Taiwan, the critical issue is not only whether US attention is divided, but how China interprets what it sees. If Beijing concludes that Washington’s resources are stretched, domestic constraints are tightening and political will is conditional, it might begin to reassess the risks of acting elsewhere.
The danger lies not only in shifts in capability, but in changes in perception.
History suggests that conflicts are rarely triggered by clear superiority. They are triggered by miscalculation — when one side believes the strategic environment is more favorable than it actually is. Wars elsewhere could produce simplified or misleading signals, increasing the risk of overconfidence.
For Taiwan, the priority is not to simply monitor developments, but to prevent the emergence of any perceived “window of opportunity.” That requires bolstering resilience across multiple domains: military preparedness, energy security, economic stability and social cohesion.
Deterrence, in this context, is not just about capability. It is about denying confidence.
At a time when geopolitical pressure and economic strain are converging, internal division is not merely a political issue — it is a strategic liability. Fragmentation weakens not only governance, but also credibility. It reinforces precisely the kind of narrative Beijing is already constructing.
Bonnie Yushih Liao is an assistant professor in Tamkang University’s Department of Diplomacy and International Relations.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS