After Taiwan’s 13-0 defeat to Japan in the World Baseball Classic (WBC) on March 6, some people on social media brought up the Legislative Yuan’s slashing of sports budgets. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Liao Wei-hsiang (廖偉翔) responded: “What size budget would it take to beat Shohei Ohtani?”
The focus of the debate was on budget cuts, but Liao’s response instead focused on the amount of money it would take to defeat Japanese superstar Ohtani. It was not a policy discussion, but a knee-jerk reaction — interpreting public investment as a sum that must yield immediate victory.
Following that line of logic, should parents first calculate how much they need to spend on cram schools for their child to rank first in the class? Education has never worked that way.
Investing in education is not about guaranteeing first place — it is about building an environment in which children can grow. Schools need teachers, administrators, facilities and systems. Without a basic foundation, even the most hardworking students would struggle to persevere.
Sports are the same. Athletes do not compete alone; behind them lies grassroots development, training systems, sports science and administrative logistics. These institutional supports are an essential part of cultivating successful athletes.
A historical example is the Qing Empire’s Beiyang Fleet. In the late 19th century, the Qing government spent a fortune establishing its navy. At one point, its total tonnage ranked among the top in the world, making it one of the strongest navies in Asia.
However, as funds were diverted, training reduced and maintenance was neglected, the fleet gradually became hollowed out. By the time the First Sino-Japanese War broke out in 1894, the seemingly powerful fleet quickly collapsed.
Liao’s line of thinking reflects the same logic; he is focused only on winning or losing, overlooking the system as a whole. When the discussion is reduced to how much money it would take to beat Ohtani, the long-term training, institutional development and administrative support necessary for sports development are neglected.
However, the administrative and logistical programs that keep these systems running have been cut during budget reviews, and the proposals for these cuts came from Liao’s party. This year’s general budget is still sitting in the Legislative Yuan waiting to be reviewed.
Liao actually has two problems: his mistaken understanding of public governance and his attitude in the face of scrutiny. When winning or losing is treated as the sole answer, the very systems that sustain sports governance all but disappear.
Shen Yan is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS