After Taiwan’s 13-0 defeat to Japan in the World Baseball Classic (WBC) on March 6, some people on social media brought up the Legislative Yuan’s slashing of sports budgets. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Liao Wei-hsiang (廖偉翔) responded: “What size budget would it take to beat Shohei Ohtani?”
The focus of the debate was on budget cuts, but Liao’s response instead focused on the amount of money it would take to defeat Japanese superstar Ohtani. It was not a policy discussion, but a knee-jerk reaction — interpreting public investment as a sum that must yield immediate victory.
Following that line of logic, should parents first calculate how much they need to spend on cram schools for their child to rank first in the class? Education has never worked that way.
Investing in education is not about guaranteeing first place — it is about building an environment in which children can grow. Schools need teachers, administrators, facilities and systems. Without a basic foundation, even the most hardworking students would struggle to persevere.
Sports are the same. Athletes do not compete alone; behind them lies grassroots development, training systems, sports science and administrative logistics. These institutional supports are an essential part of cultivating successful athletes.
A historical example is the Qing Empire’s Beiyang Fleet. In the late 19th century, the Qing government spent a fortune establishing its navy. At one point, its total tonnage ranked among the top in the world, making it one of the strongest navies in Asia.
However, as funds were diverted, training reduced and maintenance was neglected, the fleet gradually became hollowed out. By the time the First Sino-Japanese War broke out in 1894, the seemingly powerful fleet quickly collapsed.
Liao’s line of thinking reflects the same logic; he is focused only on winning or losing, overlooking the system as a whole. When the discussion is reduced to how much money it would take to beat Ohtani, the long-term training, institutional development and administrative support necessary for sports development are neglected.
However, the administrative and logistical programs that keep these systems running have been cut during budget reviews, and the proposals for these cuts came from Liao’s party. This year’s general budget is still sitting in the Legislative Yuan waiting to be reviewed.
Liao actually has two problems: his mistaken understanding of public governance and his attitude in the face of scrutiny. When winning or losing is treated as the sole answer, the very systems that sustain sports governance all but disappear.
Shen Yan is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS